{"id":37364,"date":"2015-01-05T17:51:43","date_gmt":"2015-01-05T09:51:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=37364"},"modified":"2015-01-05T17:51:43","modified_gmt":"2015-01-05T09:51:43","slug":"house-says-pcso-should-award-prize-to-lotto-winner","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2015\/01\/05\/house-says-pcso-should-award-prize-to-lotto-winner\/","title":{"rendered":"House says PCSO should award prize to lotto winner"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_35451\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-35451\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/pcso-lotto.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-35451\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/pcso-lotto-300x174.jpg\" alt=\"photo courtesy of www.pcso-lottoresults.com\" width=\"300\" height=\"174\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/pcso-lotto-300x174.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/pcso-lotto.jpg 579w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-35451\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">photo courtesy of www.pcso-lottoresults.com<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>MANILA \u2013 Cavite Representative Elpidio Barzaga Jr. said that the Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO) should pay the winner of the burned lotto ticket or else face charges for violating Republic Act No. 3019 or the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act.<\/p>\n<p>According to Barzaga, who is also the chair of the House committee on games and amusement, they can charge PCSO if they will not award Antonio Mendoza the amount of P12,991,600 because his lotto ticket could not be read by the machine.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI\u2019m drafting the committee report personally. My recommendation is for the PCSO to pay (Mendoza),\u201d said Barzaga during an interview.<\/p>\n<p>Mendoza was the owner of the winning ticket of PCSO\u2019s 6\/42 draw last October 2, 2014. However, his winning ticket was crumpled by his granddaughter. His daughter tried to iron out the ticket to smoothen it out. Unfortunately, the ticket could not be read by the PCSO machine.<\/p>\n<p>He also revealed that PCSO has P3.35 billion worth of unclaimed prizes from 2006 to 2013.<\/p>\n<p>Rojas said, in a text message, they are firm in their decision not to award the prize to Mendoza.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe already explained our position to the committee. Our policy is no ticket, no payment. A ticket must be readable and validated by our machine,\u201d Rojas said.<\/p>\n<p>However, Barzaga said that there were evidence to prove that Mendoza is the winner, one of which is that nobody else claimed that they won during the October 2 draw.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBased on these circumstances, it is but fair for the PCSO to pay Mendoza. Otherwise, the public will lose its trust in them,\u201d Barzaga said.<\/p>\n<p>Barzaga also noted that COA auditors said that they would not punish PCSO should they decide to award the prize to Mendoza even without a valid ticket provided that the agency\u2019s board supports this move.<\/p>\n<p>He is also confident that the House would agree on their recommendation before the end of January.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThey know the situation and I can ably defend the findings of the committee,\u201d Barzaga said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA \u2013 Cavite Representative Elpidio Barzaga Jr. said that the Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO) should pay the winner of &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":35451,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-37364","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ph","mauthors-lei-fontamillas","mauthors-philippine-canadian-inquirer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37364","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37364"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37364\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35451"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37364"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37364"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37364"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}