{"id":32419,"date":"2014-11-22T14:12:07","date_gmt":"2014-11-22T06:12:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=32419"},"modified":"2014-11-22T14:12:07","modified_gmt":"2014-11-22T06:12:07","slug":"ontario-quebec-want-energy-easts-greenhouse-gas-impact-considered","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2014\/11\/22\/ontario-quebec-want-energy-easts-greenhouse-gas-impact-considered\/","title":{"rendered":"Ontario, Quebec want Energy East&#8217;s greenhouse gas impact considered"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/11\/energy-east.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-32443\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/11\/energy-east.png\" alt=\"energy east\" width=\"600\" height=\"200\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>CALGARY &#8212; Ontario and Quebec have agreed greenhouse gas emissions must be considered when it comes to the proposed cross-Canada Energy East pipeline.<\/p>\n<p>But the new boss of the National Energy Board, the agency tasked with weighing the $12-billion proposal, said climate change policy isn&#8217;t within its purview and the board doesn&#8217;t intend for its hearings to become bogged down in that debate.<\/p>\n<p>Ontario and Quebec, two of the six provinces Energy East would traverse as it carries crude from Alberta to the East Coast, announced a raft of agreements on Friday, including on energy matters.<\/p>\n<p>Premiers Kathleen Wynne and Philippe Couillard on Friday agreed to build &#8220;a stronger and more competitive low-carbon economy&#8221; to fight climate change and set out a list of &#8220;principles&#8221; for new oil pipelines in their provinces.<\/p>\n<p>One of those would be to &#8220;take into account the contribution to greenhouse gas emissions.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>NEB chair and CEO Peter Watson, who&#8217;s been in the job for three months, said the NEB weighs the emissions pipelines themselves generate &#8212; a minuscule amount.<\/p>\n<p>But, much to the chagrin of pipeline critics, Watson said it&#8217;s not the board&#8217;s job to look at a project&#8217;s enabling role in oilsands growth and the rising carbon dioxide emissions that would accompany that development. Nor is it the board&#8217;s job to look at how crude products are burned for energy at the other end of the pipe.<\/p>\n<p>That authority rests with provinces and other regulators, he said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Our job is to assess the need for new cross-border energy infrastructure and to make sure it can be constructed and operated safely and in the public interest,&#8221; Watson said in a speech to the Economic Club of Canada on Friday.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Our job is not to conduct a referendum on society&#8217;s use of fossil fuels every time a proponent proposes to build a section of pipe.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Watson also said reviews must be conducted in a timely manner, but that he &#8220;won&#8217;t hesitate&#8221; to extend the legislated 15-month time limit if more information is needed or more stakeholders need the chance to be heard.<\/p>\n<p>Watson said the energy board used to garner little attention, but now he&#8217;s in the &#8220;eye of the storm&#8221; as the issue of pipeline safety rises in the public&#8217;s consciousness. Last year, the board fielded 600 inquiries from the media, compared with just 80 in 2008.<\/p>\n<p>The company proposing to build Energy East, TransCanada Corp. (TSX:TRP) filed its application &#8212; all 30,000 pages of it &#8212; to the NEB last month.<\/p>\n<p>The project would connect more than one million barrels a day of Alberta crude to export points and refineries in Quebec and New Brunswick, making use of a repurposed natural gas pipeline for two thirds of the way and building new pipe for the rest.<\/p>\n<p>Besides emissions, Ontario and Quebec&#8217;s other oil pipeline principles centre on safety, emergency response, aboriginal consultation, economic benefits, the company&#8217;s responsibility to address a spill and the interests of natural gas consumers.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We are studying these principles and look forward to working with both governments in the appropriate manner to make the project successful,&#8221; said TransCanada spokesman Tim Duboyce, adding the project would create thousands of jobs and bring in billions of tax revenue in the two provinces.<\/p>\n<p>Federal Natural Resources Minister Greg Rickford said he doesn&#8217;t think of the demands by Ontario and Quebec as a lack of confidence in the NEB process.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;They just want to make sure that their interests are represented and that&#8217;s a conversation that goes directly, in this instance, between TransCanada and those provinces.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Alberta Premier Jim Prentice said he&#8217;s not concerned Ontario and Quebec may stand in the way of the project.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This project is a nation building project and I take the comments that they made in that spirit,&#8221; he said, adding he plans to meet with his counterparts in both provinces in the weeks ahead.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I think we can all work together and I think we can do business together.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Tim Gray of Environmental Defence said Ontario and Quebec have &#8220;shown leadership&#8221; with Friday&#8217;s environmental announcements.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Specifically, the announcement says that the pipeline must ensure environmental protection and social acceptance,&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Given that the Energy East pipeline is incompatible with these goals, it is our understanding that the pipeline must be rejected by both provinces.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; CALGARY &#8212; Ontario and Quebec have agreed greenhouse gas emissions must be considered when it comes to the proposed &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":32443,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1482,18,483],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32419","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-breaking","category-news-ca","category-politics","mauthors-lauren-krugel","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32419","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32419"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32419\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/32443"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32419"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32419"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32419"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}