{"id":30005,"date":"2014-10-30T11:39:29","date_gmt":"2014-10-30T03:39:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=30005"},"modified":"2014-10-30T18:41:06","modified_gmt":"2014-10-30T10:41:06","slug":"luys-bank-accounts-to-be-opened","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2014\/10\/30\/luys-bank-accounts-to-be-opened\/","title":{"rendered":"Luy\u2019s bank accounts to be opened"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_9807\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-9807\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/benhur-luy.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-9807\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/benhur-luy-300x177.jpg\" alt=\"Pork barrel scam whistleblower Benhur Luy. Screenshot from InterAksyon\/TV5\" width=\"300\" height=\"177\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/benhur-luy-300x177.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/benhur-luy.jpg 503w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-9807\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Pork barrel scam whistleblower Benhur Luy. Screenshot from InterAksyon\/TV5<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>MANILA \u2013 The Sandiganbayan has allowed the opening of the bank accounts of Benhur Luy, pork barrel scam whistle-blower, as long as it will be used in the plunder case against Sen. Jinggoy Estrada.<\/p>\n<p>The anti-graft court\u2019s Fifth Division said that the money and other assets of the witness may be scrutinized.<\/p>\n<p>According to the Sandiganbayan, Luy\u2019s bank accounts, travel records, real property records and even vehicle ownership records, and even those of fellow whistle-blowers Marina Sula and Merlina Su\u00f1as may be subpoenaed, as requested by pork barrel fun scam mastermind Janet Lim-Napoles.<\/p>\n<p>Ombudsman lawyers tried to stop the Fifth Division saying that the whistle-blowers should not be considered given that they are the accused in the case.<\/p>\n<p>However, Fifth Division ruled in accordance with Napoles\u2019 motion.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe agree with the prosecution that the depositors-witnesses are not the accused in the instant case. We, however, find that the monies of the depositors-witnesses in the bank accounts subject of the subpoena can be considered as subject matter of the litigation,\u201d magistrates handling the Estrada plunder case said.<\/p>\n<p>All Luy, Suna and Sunas allegedly maintained multiple bank accounts with the following banks: Bank of the Philippine Islands, Metrobank, United Coconut Planters Bank, Banco De Oro, Land Bank of the Philippines, Philippine Savings Bank and Citibank.<\/p>\n<p>The Fifth Division was headed by Associate Justice Rolando Jurado with Associate Justices Alexander Gesmundo and Ma. Theresa Dolores Gomez-Estoesta as members, made a different decision from the Sandiganbayan First and Third Divisions, which prohibited scrutiny of the whistle-blower\u2019s bank accounts.<\/p>\n<p>The First Division is in-charge of the plunder case against Senator Ramon Revilla Jr., while that of Senate Minority Floor Leader Juan Ponce Enrile is with the Third Division.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA \u2013 The Sandiganbayan has allowed the opening of the bank accounts of Benhur Luy, pork barrel scam whistle-blower, as &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":9807,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[95],"tags":[3204,1579],"class_list":["post-30005","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ph","tag-benhur-luy","tag-pork-barrel-scam","mauthors-lei-fontamillas","mauthors-philippine-canadian-inquirer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30005","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30005"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30005\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9807"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30005"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30005"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30005"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}