{"id":277819,"date":"2020-12-05T10:39:01","date_gmt":"2020-12-05T15:39:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=277819"},"modified":"2020-12-05T10:39:01","modified_gmt":"2020-12-05T15:39:01","slug":"nyc-hospital-workers-knowing-how-bad-it-can-get-brace-for-covid-2nd-wave","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2020\/12\/05\/nyc-hospital-workers-knowing-how-bad-it-can-get-brace-for-covid-2nd-wave\/","title":{"rendered":"NYC Hospital Workers, Knowing How Bad It Can Get, Brace for COVID 2nd Wave"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\"\"<\/a>
But at the same time, many front-line workers are nervous about hospital preparedness, and many observers are less bullish about the effectiveness of the coronavirus testing and tracing infrastructure. (File Photo by Ashkan Forouzani\/Unsplash)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

No single municipality in the country suffered more in the first wave of the pandemic than New York City, which saw more than 24,000 deaths, mainly in the spring. Medical staff in New York know precisely how difficult and dangerous overwhelmed hospitals can be and are braced warily as infections begin to rise again.<\/p>\n

Around the New York metropolitan area, public health leaders and health care workers say they\u2019re watching the trend lines, as intensive care units fill up in other parts of the United States and around the world. They say it gives them flashbacks to last spring, when ambulance sirens were omnipresent and the region was the country\u2019s coronavirus epicenter.<\/p>\n

There is wide agreement that hospitals and care providers are in much better shape now than then, because there is much more knowledge about the disease and how to handle it; much larger stockpiles of personal protective equipment; and much, much more widespread testing.<\/p>\n

But at the same time, many front-line workers are nervous about hospital preparedness, and many observers are less bullish about the effectiveness of the coronavirus testing and tracing infrastructure.<\/p>\n

\u201cI think there\u2019s a lot of anxiety about doing this a second time,\u201d said Dr. Laura Iavicoli, head of emergency preparedness for NYC Health + Hospitals, the country\u2019s largest municipal hospital system. Iavicoli is also an active emergency room physician at Elmhurst Hospital, in Queens, which came to be called \u201cthe epicenter of the epicenter\u201d back in April. Still, she has enormous confidence in the staff of the municipal hospital system.<\/p>\n

\u201cThey will rally, because I know them,\u201d she said. \u201cI\u2019ve worked with them for 20 years, and they\u2019re the most amazing people I can possibly speak of, but there\u2019s anxiety and there\u2019s COVID fatigue.\u201d<\/p>\n

Iavicoli said some of the city\u2019s hospitals are at capacity, but she hastened to add that she\u2019s not talking about \u201cCOVID capacity\u201d \u2014 meaning not all the beds and recently reconfigured spillover spaces for COVID patients are full. Rather, she said, two of the network\u2019s 11 hospitals have had to transfer ICU patients to others to make room for incoming patients.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe are doing a little bit of redistributing around the system to give them COVID capacity, but it\u2019s very manageable within the system,\u201d Iavicoli said. \u201cThe increase is definitely typical in flu season, but knowing that we have just entered upon the second wave [of COVID-19] and predicting what is to come, we\u2019re a little even more cognizant than normal to make sure we leave capacity in all of our facilities.\u201d<\/p>\n

Many nurses, however, say hospital administrators have not learned enough from the experience in March and April.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe\u2019re scared because we\u2019re afraid we\u2019re going to have to go through this again,\u201d said Michelle Gonzalez, a critical care nurse at Montefiore Medical Center, in the Bronx, and a union representative for NYSNA, the New York State Nurses Association.<\/p>\n

She said that in her unit nurses typically handle one or two intensive care unit patients at a time \u2014 but now have to handle three, with the number of COVID patients creeping up once again. Tending to four patients or more was common at the peak of the pandemic surge. Gonzalez said that\u2019s overwhelming. If one patient crashes, several nurses need to converge at once, leaving other patients unmonitored.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhen we start to get triples with the frequency we\u2019re seeing right now, we know it\u2019s because we\u2019re short-staffed, and they\u2019re not getting ICU nurses into the building,\u201d she said at a demonstration that featured a phalanx of nurses marching from Montefiore to a nearby cemetery, bearing floral wreaths for fallen comrades, while a band and bagpiper played \u201cWhen the Saints Go Marching In\u201d and \u201cAmazing Grace.\u201d<\/p>\n

A spokesperson for the union said Montefiore, by its own reckoning, has 476 vacant nursing positions \u2014 a number that has climbed by nearly 100 since 2019.<\/p>\n

\u201cManagement is not living up to their promise to fill vacancies and hire nurses,\u201d said Kristi Barnes, from NYSNA. \u201cAs of last week, they have 188 full-time nursing jobs they have not even posted, so there is no way they can be filled.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Montefiore administration disagrees.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe have a contractual agreement with the union, and we meet the contractual obligations of that agreement,\u201d said Peter Semczuk, senior vice president of operations. \u201cWe tailor our staffing in such a flexible way to meet the needs of the patient.\u201d<\/p>\n

Like many hospital systems, Montefiore relied heavily on temporary staffing agencies for \u201ctraveling nurses\u201d from around the country earlier this year<\/a>. Hospitals are preparing to do so again \u2014 but there is demand all over the country<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u201cThey got us travelers in April, but that was four or six weeks in, and until that we were on our own,\u201d said Kathy Santoiemma, who\u2019s been a nurse at Montefiore New Rochelle for 43 years. \u201cI don\u2019t even know where they\u2019re going to get travelers now \u2014 everyone around the whole country needs travelers.\u201d<\/p>\n

NYSNA led a two-day strike at Montifiore New Rochelle<\/a> on Tuesday, after contract negotiations in the works for two years stalled on Monday.<\/p>\n

Iavicoli said each of her network\u2019s facilities has submitted requests, so that NYC Health + Hospitals could place a preliminary order now.<\/p>\n

Health planners are hoping New Yorkers won\u2019t flood into emergency rooms this time. They point to the modest climb in COVID hospitalizations<\/a> over the past two months compared with other areas, including New Jersey<\/a> and Connecticut<\/a>. One thing they hope will keep the curve relatively flat is testing, which is more pervasive in New York than almost anywhere else in the country<\/a>. About 200,000 people across New York state are getting tested each day, roughly one-third of them in New York City.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s the first step to actually interrupting further spread,\u201d said Dr. Dave Chokshi, the city health commissioner.<\/p>\n

He said mass testing works on two levels \u2014 by highlighting which areas are hot zones, so health workers can target residents with \u201chyper-local\u201d messages about COVID-19 spread, to get them to change their behavior, and also by allowing contact tracers to communicate individually with newly infected people.<\/p>\n

\u201cOnce someone tests positive, we very quickly help them isolate,\u201d Chokshi said. \u201cWe do an interview with them to know who their close contacts are, and then we call those contacts and make sure they\u2019re quarantining as well.\u201d<\/p>\n

However, the city\u2019s contact-tracing program has had a mixed record. The people it reaches say they\u2019re staying put \u2014 but fewer than half of them<\/a> share names of people they might have exposed. Denis Nash, an epidemiologist who previously worked for the city\u2019s Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said the city hasn\u2019t successfully drilled down into how the coronavirus actually spreads, because contact tracers aren\u2019t asking people enough questions about their behaviors and possible exposures.<\/p>\n

\u201cDuring the summer and early fall, when things were slowly ramping up, there were missed opportunities to use contact tracing to talk to 80 or 90% of all newly diagnosed people, to understand what their risk factors were and what kinds of things \u2026 were they exposed to that could have potentially resulted in them getting the virus,\u201d he said. \u201cYou can never know with 100% certainty [where they contracted the virus], but if you ask these questions, you could begin to understand what some likely patterns were \u2014 for example, of public transportation use, or working in office buildings that didn\u2019t have rigorous safety protocols, or indoor dining.\u201d<\/p>\n

This knowledge, though imperfect, could lead to better informed public policy decisions, Nash said, about whether to close indoor restaurants, beauty salons or fitness centers. Without that data, leaders are just making guesses.<\/p>\n

Others fault the city\u2019s testing and tracing program for not reaching out enough to poor communities of color \u2014 which suffered disproportionately during the first COVID wave. Chokshi, the health commissioner, said getting testing sites to these neighborhoods has been a priority \u2014 but a recent analysis<\/a> suggested it\u2019s not working as well as the city intended.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere\u2019s clearly a disparity in providing widespread testing across New York City,\u201d said Wil Lieberman-Cribbin, a graduate student and environmental health researcher at Columbia University.<\/p>\n

He looked at how many people are getting tested, by neighborhood, and correlated those figures with race, income level and COVID positivity. In wealthier areas, people are getting many more tests and have much less illness. In poorer ones, people are getting many fewer tests and are much sicker. More testing in those areas would pick up cases sooner, before people develop symptoms.<\/p>\n

\u201cTesting is really, really needed, not only to protect the most vulnerable, but to collectively try and get a handle on COVID and reopen New York City,\u201d Lieberman-Cribbin said.<\/p>\n

Personal protective equipment, or PPE, is also much more ample than it was last spring but, similarly, remains a source of contention.<\/p>\n

New York state health authorities are requiring hospitals to stockpile a 90-day supply of PPE; for nursing homes, it\u2019s 60 days\u2019 worth. Many facilities have complied with September and October deadlines, but others have not<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Montefiore, NYC Health + Hospitals, and other large hospital networks say they have at least that much, if not more.<\/p>\n

Nurses, though, say they should be able to get fresh N95 masks each time they see a new patient, to limit the risk of contamination. Many administrators counter that isn\u2019t feasible, given the precariousness of the supply chain. They note that CDC guidelines<\/a> permit \u201cextended use\u201d of some PPE.<\/p>\n

\u201c[Nurses and other caregivers] change their gloves between every patient, but they might wear the same N95 mask for one shift and put a surgical mask over it just to preserve it and only switch it out if there\u2019s some integrity issue or it gets contaminated,\u201d said Iavicoli, of the city hospital system. \u201cBut definitely at the next shift, they\u2019re getting a new one.\u201d<\/p>\n

Iavicoli acknowledged the challenges as the pandemic rolls on and said there are four kinds of days: \u201cblue skies, or normal,\u201d \u201cbusier than normal,\u201d \u201ca little stretched\u201d and \u201cextremely stretched.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cI think we\u2019re at the top end of \u2018busy normal\u2019 bordering on \u2018a little more than overstretched,\u2019\u201d said Iavicoli.<\/p>\n

This story is from a reporting partnership that includes <\/i>WNYC<\/i><\/a>, <\/i>NPR<\/i><\/a> and <\/i>KHN<\/i><\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n

Subscribe<\/a> to KHN’s free Morning Briefing.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

No single municipality in the country suffered more in the first wave of the pandemic than New York City, which …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":251210,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-277819","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","mauthors-fred-mogul","mauthors-wnyc","mauthors-kaiser-health-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/277819","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=277819"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/277819\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":277820,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/277819\/revisions\/277820"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/251210"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=277819"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=277819"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=277819"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}