{"id":273613,"date":"2020-10-31T08:30:30","date_gmt":"2020-10-31T12:30:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=273613"},"modified":"2020-10-31T08:30:30","modified_gmt":"2020-10-31T12:30:30","slug":"what-a-trump-win-or-loss-will-mean-for-feminism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2020\/10\/31\/what-a-trump-win-or-loss-will-mean-for-feminism\/","title":{"rendered":"What a Trump win or loss will mean for feminism"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_273614\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-273614\" style=\"width: 2048px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/123192647_3588197714601269_4619347396692803704_o.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-273614\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/123192647_3588197714601269_4619347396692803704_o.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"2048\" height=\"1365\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/123192647_3588197714601269_4619347396692803704_o.jpg 2048w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/123192647_3588197714601269_4619347396692803704_o-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/123192647_3588197714601269_4619347396692803704_o-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/123192647_3588197714601269_4619347396692803704_o-1024x683.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 2048px) 100vw, 2048px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-273614\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">If Donald Trump loses the election, he will blame everyone but himself. (File <a href=\"https:\/\/web.facebook.com\/WhiteHouse\/photos\/3588197704601270\">photo<\/a>: <a href=\"https:\/\/web.facebook.com\/WhiteHouse\/\">The White House\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>In the United States, polls are pointing to a Joe Biden, Kamala Harris win on Tuesday. Media pundits are unusually cautious about <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nbcnews.com\/politics\/2020-election\/polls-could-be-wrong-may-help-biden-not-just-trump-n1244753\">polls and projections about the election outcome<\/a>, and women want so badly to see the end of the \u201cpussy-grabber-in-chief\u201d that they almost dare not give voice to their dire wish.<\/p>\n<p>If Donald Trump loses the election, he will blame everyone but himself.<\/p>\n<p>If Biden becomes the next president, he needs to show women that he understands the value of their votes by making his <a href=\"https:\/\/joebiden.com\/womens-agenda\/#\">campaign promises for women<\/a> a reality. A Biden win signals to women that all their organizing, fuelled by anger and opposition to the Trump presidency, has paid off.<\/p>\n<p>A Trump win, on the other hand, will be demoralizing, and the anger from citizens will be unpredictable. It may once again lead to massive protests, organizing and a determination to block him that is even more fierce than before. But that anger might also turn inward in a depressing spiral as people disengage from politics and deal with profound sadness. Hopefully, that demobilization is short-lived.<\/p>\n<p>Seldom has a U.S. election featured such a gender divide with such huge <a href=\"https:\/\/morningconsult.com\/2020\/10\/07\/women-voters-poll-presidential-election\/\">consequences for feminism hanging in the balance<\/a>. As a former MP and leadership candidate, I teach a course that encourages young women to get involved in politics. A Trump loss signals to them that women\u2019s votes really do matter.<\/p>\n<h2>The resistance<\/h2>\n<p>First and foremost, a Trump loss signals that the indefatigable efforts of American women to defeat this president have paid off. White working class and suburban women <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2016\/12\/01\/us\/politics\/white-women-helped-elect-donald-trump.html\">were criticized<\/a> for supporting Trump in 2016. Immediately after Trump\u2019s inauguration, the feminist resistance took hold, with women marching across the United States. The women\u2019s marches of January 2017 were some of the largest demonstrations in the country\u2019s history. Women who never thought they would attend a rally <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amacad.org\/publication\/donald-trumps-gift-feminism-resistance\">came out to protest<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Women\u2019s fury was again channelled into the midterm elections when an unprecedented number of women ran for elected office and an unprecedented number won, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2018\/11\/07\/politics\/historic-firsts-midterms\/index.html\">with many firsts for diversity<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Women like <a href=\"https:\/\/www.refinery29.com\/en-ca\/2018\/11\/216290\/election-candidates-women-of-colour-ocasio-cortez-tlaib-midterms-2018\">Ilhan Omar, Ayanna Pressley and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez<\/a> have added their strong voices to public civic life and in the policies of the Democratic Party. Grassroots organizers from #MeToo and #BlackLivesMatter mobilized tens of thousands of new activists. If this organizing pays off on Tuesday, and Trump is defeated, activists across the country will have wind in their sails and a spring in their step.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><em><br \/>\n<strong><br \/>\nRead more:<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-is-shaking-up-old-politics-with-her-new-style-116948\">Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is shaking up old politics with her new style<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong><br \/>\n<\/em><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2>A much-needed boost<\/h2>\n<p>A Trump loss will steer the U.S. towards a better COVID-19 playbook. The pandemic has disproportionately impacted marginalized women \u2014 both medically and economically. It has sparked what some are calling a \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/voxeu.org\/article\/shecession-she-recession-2020-causes-and-consequences\">she-cession<\/a>.\u201d A Trump loss would likely mean added attention to assisting women workers and providing family support, and possibly a much-needed infusion of funds.<\/p>\n<p>A Trump defeat also means the U.S. elects its first woman and its first racialized vice-president. This will be a huge morale boost for feminist movements and Harris will be a role model for everyone as a woman of colour takes on the second-highest job in the land.<\/p>\n<p>This may be especially inspiring for racialized American women who are disproportionately suffering from COVID-19 and economic inequality right now. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2020\/10\/21\/politics\/black-women-voters-michigan\/index.html\">Racialized women have traditionally voted Democrat<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>With the appointment of right-leaning <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/article\/amy-barrett-views-issues.html\">Amy Coney Barrett<\/a> to the U.S. Supreme Court, the president has tried to ensure he survives, zombie-like, past any political death. Her appointment doesn\u2019t change if he\u2019s defeated. But one way to try to defend Democratic priorities important to women, such as <em>Roe vs. Wade<\/em> and Obamacare, would be to see if her appointment could be buffered by a President Joe Biden expanding the size of the court and appointing additional judges.<\/p>\n<h2>A better future<\/h2>\n<p>A second Trump term would be demoralizing for millions of women. Many will ask how far their country can regress and unravel before righting itself.<\/p>\n<p>Some will ask if the U.S. has not already fundamentally changed with respect to democracy and human rights to the point that it\u2019s unrecognizable. The thought of four more years of unravelling may be too unbearable to contemplate.<\/p>\n<p>With abortion rights, Obamacare, housing policy and so much else at stake at the U.S. Supreme Court, a Trump second term would likely increase economic, racial, gender and democratic polarization. Many women fear not only a loss of rights but a loss of democratic freedoms and civil liberties.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps the worst outcome of a Trump win would be his triumphalism in the face of so much hard work and organizing by women to defeat him. He would not be able to resist a boastful Twitter campaign extolling his brilliance and charm.<\/p>\n<p>Women are not monolithic. Trump still has many women supporters. But many other women have poured their hearts and souls into fighting for a better future. And most of them believe this hinges on a Trump\/Mike Pence loss and a Biden\/Harris win. If their goal becomes a reality, the new administration will need to signal that it understands who was key to putting them in office and recognize their priorities.<!-- Below is The Conversation's page counter tag. Please DO NOT REMOVE. --><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"border: none !important;margin: 0 !important;max-height: 1px !important;max-width: 1px !important;min-height: 1px !important;min-width: 1px !important;padding: 0 !important\" src=\"https:\/\/counter.theconversation.com\/content\/149037\/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic\" alt=\"The Conversation\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" \/><!-- End of code. If you don't see any code above, please get new code from the Advanced tab after you click the republish button. The page counter does not collect any personal data. More info: https:\/\/theconversation.com\/republishing-guidelines --><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/profiles\/peggy-nash-720102\">Peggy Nash<\/a>, Senior Advisor to the Dean of the Faculty of Arts + Labour Management Relations, <em><a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/institutions\/ryerson-university-1607\">Ryerson University<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>This article is republished from <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\">The Conversation<\/a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/what-a-trump-win-or-loss-will-mean-for-feminism-149037\">original article<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the United States, polls are pointing to a Joe Biden, Kamala Harris win on Tuesday. Media pundits are unusually &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":273614,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-273613","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","mauthors-peggy-nash-ryerson-university","mauthors-the-conversation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/273613","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=273613"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/273613\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":273615,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/273613\/revisions\/273615"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/273614"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=273613"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=273613"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=273613"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}