{"id":270159,"date":"2020-09-28T08:01:49","date_gmt":"2020-09-28T12:01:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=270159"},"modified":"2020-09-28T08:01:49","modified_gmt":"2020-09-28T12:01:49","slug":"palace-stands-by-order-requiring-face-shields-in-workplaces","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2020\/09\/28\/palace-stands-by-order-requiring-face-shields-in-workplaces\/","title":{"rendered":"Palace stands by order requiring face shields in workplaces"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_264163\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-264163\" style=\"width: 1920px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/engin-akyurt-43u2lQG7U4w-unsplash.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-264163\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/engin-akyurt-43u2lQG7U4w-unsplash.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1920\" height=\"1280\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/engin-akyurt-43u2lQG7U4w-unsplash.jpg 1920w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/engin-akyurt-43u2lQG7U4w-unsplash-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/engin-akyurt-43u2lQG7U4w-unsplash-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/engin-akyurt-43u2lQG7U4w-unsplash-1024x683.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1920px) 100vw, 1920px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-264163\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Roque said he did not find the wearing of face shields \u201cunreasonable\u201d because their prices have significantly dropped. (File photo: engin akyurt\/Unsplash)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong>MANILA<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 Malaca\u00f1ang on Monday stood by the order to require the wearing of face shields and the establishment of isolation rooms in workplaces amid the coronavirus disease (Covid-19), stressing that the fight against the pandemic is a \u201cshared responsibility.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In a virtual Palace briefing, Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque made this remark after business groups asked to exempt factory and office workers from wearing face shields.<\/p>\n<p>Roque said he did not find the wearing of face shields \u201cunreasonable\u201d because their prices have significantly dropped.<\/p>\n<p>He also emphasized that face shields are scientifically proven to be effective in preventing Covid-19 transmission, especially when worn together with face masks.<\/p>\n<p><em>\u201cKung hindi po ako nagkakamali, ang pagsusuot ng<\/em>\u00a0face masks<em>\u00a0ay<\/em>\u00a094 percent effective in preventing Covid,\u00a0<em>ang<\/em>\u00a0face shields\u00a0<em>po<\/em>\u00a0additional 3 percent, so, 97 percent protection<em>\u00a0po ang ibinibigay sa mga mamamayan<\/em>\u00a0(If I\u2019m not mistaken, wearing of face mask is 94 percent effective in preventing Covid, face shield provide an additional 3 percent, so the protection given by them being worth together increases to 97 percent),\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>Roque, likewise, urged private sectors to coordinate with local government units (LGUs) to allow them to build isolation rooms in barangays where their office or factory can be found following concerns over the lack of space in workplaces.<\/p>\n<p>\u201c<em>Kung<\/em>\u00a0space\u00a0<em>po ang problema, makipag-ugnayan lang po ang ating mga<\/em>\u00a0employer\u00a0<em>sa lokal na pamahalaan at pupuwede naman pong bigyan ng espasyo ng lokal na pamahalaan<\/em>\u00a0(If space is a problem, employers may coordinate with local governments to provide space for isolation rooms),\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>According to Roque, the fight against Covid-19 is a \u201cshared responsibility\u201d, adding that the Labor Code requires employers to have clinics in their workplaces depending on how big their operations are.<\/p>\n<p><em>\u201cHindi po natin pupuwedeng sabihin na ang mga<\/em>\u00a0employers\u00a0<em>dahil sila ang may-ari ng<\/em>\u00a0workplace<em>\u00a0kung saan marami ring mga<\/em>\u00a0transmission\u00a0<em>ng<\/em>\u00a0Covid-19\u00a0<em>ay walang responsibilidad<\/em>\u00a0(We cannot say that employers, who own the workplaces where transmission of Covid-19 may take place, have no responsibility),\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>Under the Labor Code, employers are required to furnish employees with free medical and dental attendance and facilities.<\/p>\n<p>In a letter dated Sept. 21, business groups requested exemption from wearing face shields in offices and factories, arguing that it affects productivity.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe respectfully take exception to the wearing of face shields inside the office and factories for the rest of our employees, since this can adversely affect their vision, physical safety, and productivity,\u201d the groups said.<\/p>\n<p>The letter was signed by George Barcelon, president emeritus of the Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PCCI) and a private sector representative in the Legislative-Executive Development Advisory Council.<\/p>\n<p>The other signatories were Sergio Ortiz-Luis Jr., PCCI treasurer and president of the Philippine Exporters Confederation; Edgardo Lacson, PCCI auditor, and chair of Employers Confederation of the Philippines; and Francis Chua, PCCI director and chair of the Philippine Silk Road International Chamber of Commerce.<em><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA\u00a0\u2013 Malaca\u00f1ang on Monday stood by the order to require the wearing of face shields and the establishment of isolation &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,16,95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-270159","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","mauthors-azer-parrocha","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/270159","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=270159"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/270159\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":270160,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/270159\/revisions\/270160"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=270159"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=270159"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=270159"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}