{"id":264718,"date":"2020-08-10T05:25:02","date_gmt":"2020-08-10T09:25:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=264718"},"modified":"2020-08-10T05:25:02","modified_gmt":"2020-08-10T09:25:02","slug":"ph-still-asserting-sovereign-rights-vs-china-panelo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2020\/08\/10\/ph-still-asserting-sovereign-rights-vs-china-panelo\/","title":{"rendered":"PH still asserting sovereign rights vs China: Panelo"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
fILE: This handout photo taken on March 17, 2015 by satellite imagery provider DigitalGlobe and released to AFP by the Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative department at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSSI) think tank shows a satellite image of vessels purportedly dredging sand at Mischief Reef in the Spratly Islands in the disputed South China Sea. The series of satellite images posted on the website of the Center for Strategic and International Studies last week show a flotilla of Chinese vessels dredging sand onto Mischief Reef and the resulting land spreading in size. Beijing on April 9 reaffirmed its right to build on the disputed islands after the satellite imagery emerged of construction operations turning tropical reefs into concrete artificial islands. The Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and Taiwan all have overlapping claims in the area. (AFP Photo \/ CSIS Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative \/ DigitalGlobe)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

MANILA<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 The Philippines continues to assert its sovereign rights over the West Philippine Sea against China amid the prevailing coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic, Chief Presidential Legal Counsel Salvador Panelo said on Monday.<\/p>\n

In his commentary show \u201cCounterpoint\u201d aired on state-run PTV-4, Panelo hit critics anew for saying that the Duterte administration is not doing enough to assert the tribunal ruling which found no basis for China to claim the entire South China Sea.<\/p>\n

Panelo rejected these claims, saying Foreign Affairs Secretary Teodoro \u201cTeddyboy\u201d Locsin Jr. sees to it that diplomatic protests are immediately filed against China in instances they violate international maritime law.<\/p>\n

\u201cHindi totoo yung sinasabi niyo na tayo ay<\/em>\u00a0walking\u00a0parang dahan-dahan pag<\/em>\u00a0involved\u00a0ang<\/em>\u00a0China.\u00a0Nakikita niyo naman, kita niyo si<\/em>\u00a0Secretary Teddyboy Locsin,\u00a0pag bumanat ka diyan, gumalaw ka diyan sa<\/em>\u00a0South China Sea,\u00a0banat kaagad, may protesta kaagad<\/em>\u00a0(It\u2019s not true what you\u2019re saying that we\u2019re taking slow steps when China is involved. You can see Secretary Teddy Boy Locsin, if they do something, take action in the South China Sea, he would immediately file a protest),\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Panelo said he could not understand what else critics wanted the Duterte administration to do.<\/p>\n

\u201cPinagpipilitan nila na<\/em>\u00a0assert sovereignty.\u00a0Ano pa bang gusto niyong<\/em>\u00a0assertion?\u00a0Pag nagkrelamo ka doon sa galaw laban sa ating<\/em>\u00a0claim, e you\u2019re already asserting (They keep insisting us to assert sovereignty. What kind of assertion do you want? If you file a protest against what they did against our claim, you\u2019re already asserting),\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

According to Panelo, while other countries with claims on the disputed waters have been more aggressive in asserting their claim, they have yet to convince China to respect the arbitral ruling as well.<\/p>\n

\u201cNakuha ba nila yung gusto nila? Hindi rin. Paulit-ulit lang. E di mas maganda yung ginagawa ni Presidente<\/em>\u00a0(Did they get what they want? They didn\u2019t. It\u2019s a cycle. Then what the President is doing is better). We are asserting our claim over the place at the same time\u00a0nakikipag-usap tayo<\/em>\u00a0diplomatically (we are dealing with them diplomatically)\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Panelo defended Duterte\u2019s remark that asserting sovereign rights over the West Philippine Sea would entail going to war with China, saying that China is \u201ccapable of guarding their claimed territory\u201d.<\/p>\n

\u201cYun ang ibig sabihin ni Presidente, na hindi rin sila papayag kung papasukan sila at papakialaman mo yung kanilang claim din. Lalabanan ka rin nila. Yun ang iniiwasan nga ni Presidente<\/em>\u00a0(That\u2019s what the President is trying to say, China will not allow the Philippines to interfere on their own claims. They will go into war. That\u2019s what the President is trying to avoid),\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

He also echoed former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, saying it was easy to criticize Duterte since they\u2019re not the ones in charge.<\/p>\n

\u201cKayong mga<\/em>\u00a0armchair general,\u00a0tingin niyo napakadali. O sige, maupo kayo bilang Presidente<\/em>\u00a0(You armchair generals, you think it\u2019s easy. You should try being President),\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

In 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague, Netherlands invalidated China’s nine-dash line, a geographical marker Beijing invoked to assert its extensive claims in the strategic waters.<\/p>\n

The tribunal decided in favor of the Philippines\u2019 arbitration case filed against China in 2013 but Beijing rejected it as null and void.<\/p>\n

Duterte, last year, made true his promise to invoke the arbitral ruling won by the Philippines against China after temporarily shelving it to make way for friendlier relations but Chinese President Xi Jinping stood pat on his decision not to recognize the ruling.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

MANILA\u00a0\u2013 The Philippines continues to assert its sovereign rights over the West Philippine Sea against China amid the prevailing coronavirus …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":47252,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-264718","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-ph","mauthors-azer-parrocha","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/264718","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=264718"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/264718\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":264720,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/264718\/revisions\/264720"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/47252"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=264718"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=264718"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=264718"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}