{"id":263660,"date":"2020-07-31T06:58:13","date_gmt":"2020-07-31T10:58:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=263660"},"modified":"2020-07-31T06:58:13","modified_gmt":"2020-07-31T10:58:13","slug":"close-relatives-of-the-coronavirus-may-have-been-in-bats-for-decades","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2020\/07\/31\/close-relatives-of-the-coronavirus-may-have-been-in-bats-for-decades\/","title":{"rendered":"Close relatives of the coronavirus may have been in bats for decades"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
But the study suggests the coronavirus most likely evolved in bats \u2014 such as intermediate horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus affinis), the source of the coronavirus that caused the 2003\u20132004 SARS outbreak \u2014\u00a0not snakes\u00a0or pangolins as some researchers have suggested (SN: 1\/24\/20). (File photo: Igam Ogam\/Unsplash)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Similar viruses with the potential to infect humans could be circulating in the mammals
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

Viruses from the coronavirus lineage responsible for COVID-19 have been circulating in bats for decades, long before the virus started infecting people last year, a new study suggests.<\/p>\n

How exactly the virus jumped to humans is still a mystery. But the study suggests the coronavirus most likely evolved in bats \u2014 such as intermediate horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus affinis<\/em>), the source of the coronavirus that caused the 2003\u20132004 SARS outbreak \u2014\u00a0not snakes<\/a>\u00a0or pangolins as some researchers have suggested (SN: 1\/24\/20<\/em>). Pangolins or another animal might still have been an intermediate host before the virus made it to humans.<\/p>\n

Maciej Boni, an epidemiologist at Penn State, and his colleagues examined the genetic blueprints of the new coronavirus, or SARS-CoV-2, and 67 related viruses. The analysis aimed to uncover the evolutionary history of SARS-CoV-2 and see if the virus had exchanged bits of genetic material with other coronaviruses, a process called recombination, to become the formidable pathogen it is now.<\/p>\n

SARS-CoV-2 is\u00a0not the result of genetic shuffling<\/a>\u00a0among known coronaviruses, the researchers report July 28 in\u00a0Nature Microbiology<\/em>. Previous studies had suggested that recombination with\u00a0coronaviruses from pangolins<\/a>\u00a0may have contributed a portion of the virus\u2019 spike protein, which is used to break into human cells (SN: 3\/26\/20<\/em>). But the spike\u2019s ability to attach to a protein on host cells called ACE2, which allows the virus to gain entry, appears to be an ancestral trait, rather than one gained from recombination.<\/p>\n

Based on the evolutionary relationship among the 68 coronaviruses, the researchers estimate that the branch of the virus family tree that leads to SARS-CoV-2 diverged from related viruses between 1948 and 1982. Those dates suggest that the coronavirus lineage that gave rise to the virus behind the pandemic has been present in bats for decades.<\/p>\n

That long period hints that more bat viruses with the potential to infect humans are circulating in horseshoe bats. Searching for such bat viruses can help identify potential threats before the pathogens make the jump, the team writes.<\/p>\n

This story was originally published by Science News<\/a>, a nonprofit independent news organization.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Similar viruses with the potential to infect humans could be circulating in the mammals Viruses from the coronavirus lineage responsible …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":263661,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-263660","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-health","mauthors-erin-garcia-de-jesus","mauthors-science-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263660","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=263660"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263660\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":263662,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263660\/revisions\/263662"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/263661"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=263660"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=263660"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=263660"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}