{"id":259897,"date":"2020-06-30T21:14:07","date_gmt":"2020-07-01T01:14:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=259897"},"modified":"2020-06-30T21:14:07","modified_gmt":"2020-07-01T01:14:07","slug":"chinese-president-xi-signs-new-hong-kong-security-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2020\/06\/30\/chinese-president-xi-signs-new-hong-kong-security-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Chinese President Xi signs new Hong Kong security law"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_259898\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-259898\" style=\"width: 1280px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/flag-4530383_1280.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-259898 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/flag-4530383_1280.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1280\" height=\"853\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/flag-4530383_1280.jpg 1280w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/flag-4530383_1280-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/flag-4530383_1280-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/flag-4530383_1280-1024x682.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-259898\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The legislation would make it a crime to undermine Beijing&#8217;s authority in Hong Kong. (Pixabay photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong>ANKARA<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 China\u2019s president on Tuesday signed a decree imposing a controversial new security law on Hong Kong, local media reported.<\/p>\n<p>Xi Jinping signed the decree after the Standing Committee of China\u2019s 13th National People&#8217;s Congress (NPC), China\u2019s top legislative body, unanimously voted to pass the law earlier today, the daily Global Times reported.<\/p>\n<p>The bill came in the wake of months of protests and what China calls &#8220;anti-national&#8221; activities last year in the semi-autonomous territory.<\/p>\n<p>The legislation would make it a crime to undermine Beijing&#8217;s authority in Hong Kong. Hong Kong, which has been under Chinese sovereignty since 1997, witnessed large protests last year against a move to legalize the extradition of accused persons to mainland China.<\/p>\n<p>Ahead of the final approval of the law, the US has vowed to eliminate policy exemptions for Hong Kong, including export controls on dual-use technologies.<\/p>\n<p>The United Kingdom, Australia, and Canada have also expressed deep concern over the law, saying it could be used to stifle dissent.<\/p>\n<p>Beijing rejects the criticism, saying it will not tolerate meddling in its \u201cinternal affairs.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>However, Li Zhanshu, chairman of the congress, referring to Hong Kong\u2019s special status, said: \u201cThe one country, two systems cause should be steered toward the right direction.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>He emphasized \u201cresolute and effective efforts to safeguard national security and the constitutional order and the order of rule of law in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region,\u201d Xinhua news reported.<em><strong>\u00a0(Anadolu)<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ANKARA\u00a0\u2013 China\u2019s president on Tuesday signed a decree imposing a controversial new security law on Hong Kong, local media reported. &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":259898,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-259897","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","mauthors-anadolu","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259897","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=259897"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259897\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":259899,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259897\/revisions\/259899"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/259898"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=259897"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=259897"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=259897"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}