{"id":259892,"date":"2020-06-30T21:06:23","date_gmt":"2020-07-01T01:06:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=259892"},"modified":"2020-06-30T21:06:23","modified_gmt":"2020-07-01T01:06:23","slug":"china-passes-hong-kong-national-security-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2020\/06\/30\/china-passes-hong-kong-national-security-law\/","title":{"rendered":"China passes Hong Kong national security law"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_259893\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-259893\" style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/50057443773_50bfcc0513_c.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-259893 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/50057443773_50bfcc0513_c.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"800\" height=\"600\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/50057443773_50bfcc0513_c.jpg 800w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/50057443773_50bfcc0513_c-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/50057443773_50bfcc0513_c-768x576.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-259893\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The new law expected to come into effect on July 1, the 23rd anniversary of the city\u2019s handover to China from British rule. (File <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/studiokanu\/50057443773\/\">photo<\/a> by RL for Studio Incendo via <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/studiokanu\/\">Studio Incendo\/Flickr<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/\">CC BY 2.0<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong>ANKARA<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 China has passed a national security law for Hong Kong on Tuesday to rein in the semi-autonomous region after months of protests last year, the local media reported.<\/p>\n<p>According to the South China Morning Post (SCMP), the Standing Committee of the National People&#8217;s Congress (NPC), China&#8217;s top legislature, unanimously passed the security law after a detailed deliberation.<\/p>\n<p>The new law expected to come into effect on July 1, the 23rd anniversary of the city\u2019s handover to China from British rule.<\/p>\n<p>The new security law for Hong Kong prohibits acts of secession, subversion, terrorism, and collusion with foreign forces, the daily reported.<\/p>\n<p>Earlier, Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor during her weekly briefing refused to comment on the new law and said she would not answer any question until the new law is passed.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt would be inappropriate for me to answer any questions and explain (the law) at this stage,\u201d the SCMP quoted her as saying.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Key opposition members resign<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Soon after the passage of the law, key opposition leaders Joshua Wong Chi-fung, Nathan Law Kwun-chung, and Agnes Chow Ting announced to resign from their party and to quit politics.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI now announce that I have resigned as secretary general of Demosisto and quit the party at the same time. I will practice my beliefs in a personal capacity,\u201d Wong quoted SCMP as saying.<\/p>\n<p>Wong is believed to have played a major role in lobbying US politicians for their support to pass the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act last year.<\/p>\n<p><strong>US reaction<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Monday announced his country was ending the export of sensitive military equipment to Hong Kong.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Today, the United States is ending exports of @StateDeptPM controlled US-origin defense equipment and sensitive @CommerceGov controlled dual-use technologies to Hong Kong. If Beijing now treats Hong Kong as \u2018One Country, One System,\u2019 so must we,&#8221; Pompeo tweeted.<\/p>\n<p>He also criticized the Chinese move to impose visa restrictions on US officials, saying, &#8220;The Chinese Communist Party&#8217;s threats to restrict visas for US citizens is the latest example of Beijing\u2019s refusal to accept responsibility for breaking its commitment to the people of Hong Kong. We will not be deterred from taking action to respond.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>On Monday, China announced visa restrictions on US officials who \u201cbehave egregiously\u201d concerning Hong Kong affairs, days after Washington announced similar restrictions on Chinese officials believed to be undermining freedoms in the Asian financial hub.<\/p>\n<p>China\u2019s Foreign Ministry Spokesman Zhao Lijian urged the US to stop reviewing or implementing any Hong Kong-related acts, saying, \u201cAny effort by the US to hinder Beijing\u2019s introduction of national security law in Hong Kong would not succeed.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Last month, the NPC approved a new national security bill for Hong Kong to tackle &#8220;anti-national&#8221; activities, which under the new law will be a crime to undermine Beijing&#8217;s authority in Hong Kong.<\/p>\n<p>The semi-autonomous region became part of China in 1997.<\/p>\n<p>It witnessed large-scale protests last year against a move to legalize the extradition of accused persons to mainland China.\u00a0<em><strong>(Anadolu)<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ANKARA\u00a0\u2013 China has passed a national security law for Hong Kong on Tuesday to rein in the semi-autonomous region after &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":259893,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-259892","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259892","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=259892"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259892\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":259894,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259892\/revisions\/259894"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/259893"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=259892"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=259892"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=259892"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}