{"id":259031,"date":"2020-06-23T21:58:10","date_gmt":"2020-06-24T01:58:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=259031"},"modified":"2020-06-23T21:58:10","modified_gmt":"2020-06-24T01:58:10","slug":"palace-respects-sc-ruling-on-quo-warranto-vs-abs-cbn","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2020\/06\/23\/palace-respects-sc-ruling-on-quo-warranto-vs-abs-cbn\/","title":{"rendered":"Palace respects SC ruling on quo warranto vs. ABS-CBN"},"content":{"rendered":"

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
ABS-CBN\u2019s franchise already expired on May 4 after Congress failed to give the network a new franchise. (File photo by patrickroque001\/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

MANILA \u2013<\/strong>\u00a0Malaca\u00f1ang on Tuesday said it respects the decision of the Supreme Court (SC) to dismiss the quo warranto plea filed by Solicitor General Jose Calida against broadcasting firm ABS-CBN Corp.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe respect the decision of the High Court, a separate and co-equal branch of government, on the quo warranto case filed against ABS-CBN Corporation,\u201d Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque said in a press statement.<\/p>\n

Roque issued the statement the same day the SC en banc junked Calida\u2019s request to revoke ABS-CBN\u2019s franchise, as it ruled that the issue was already \u201cmoot\u201d because the franchise already expired on May 4.<\/p>\n

In February, Calida filed a petition for quo warranto, asking the SC to nullify ABS-CBN\u2019s franchise due to the networks\u2019 supposed violations of conditions set by Congress for the 25-year operation of its television and radio broadcasting stations.<\/p>\n

Calida alleged that ABS-CBN allowed foreign entities to take part in the ownership of a Philippine mass media entity, which is a violation of the 1987 Constitution.<\/p>\n

He also accused the network of launching the TV Plus subscription service and the KBO Channel without the National Telecommunications Communications\u2019 (NTC) approval.<\/p>\n

Roque said the Palace would let Calida take appropriate legal actions following the SC\u2019s latest ruling.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe leave it to the Solicitor-General as the Petitioner to decide on his next legal steps,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

ABS-CBN\u2019s franchise already expired on May 4 after Congress failed to give the network a new franchise.<\/p>\n

ABS-CBN went off the air on May 5 after the NTC issued a cease and desist order against the local media giant following the expiration of its franchise.<\/p>\n

ABS-CBN has repeatedly maintained that it did not commit any violation.<\/p>\n

On May 7, ABS-CBN asked SC to nullify and set aside the NTCs cease and desist order, claiming that the state commission \u201cgravely abused its discretion\u201d when it made the ruling.<\/p>\n

Roque reiterated that the executive branch would let Congress decide on the fate of ABS-CBN\u2019s franchise.<\/p>\n

\u201cMeanwhile on the issue of renewal of ABS-CBN franchise, we consider this a prerogative of Congress, which is presently deliberating on the matter,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

The bills granting a fresh franchise to ABS-CBN remain pending before the House of Representatives.<\/p>\n

Malaca\u00f1ang earlier guaranteed that President Rodrigo Duterte would not veto the franchise bill that would be approved by lawmakers once it reaches his table and if there is no constitutional infirmity.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

  MANILA \u2013\u00a0Malaca\u00f1ang on Tuesday said it respects the decision of the Supreme Court (SC) to dismiss the quo warranto …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":239442,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,16,95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-259031","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","mauthors-ruth-abbey-gita-carlos","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259031","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=259031"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259031\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":259032,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259031\/revisions\/259032"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/239442"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=259031"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=259031"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=259031"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}