{"id":257959,"date":"2020-06-13T05:55:36","date_gmt":"2020-06-13T09:55:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=257959"},"modified":"2025-01-17T14:22:03","modified_gmt":"2025-01-17T19:22:03","slug":"2-offices-under-op-still-reviewing-anti-terror-bill-palace","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2020\/06\/13\/2-offices-under-op-still-reviewing-anti-terror-bill-palace\/","title":{"rendered":"2 offices under OP still reviewing anti-terror bill: Palace"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
FILE: Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque Jr. during a press conference at the Presidential Guest House in Panacan, Davao City on January 4, 2018. JOEY DALUMPINES\/PRESIDENTIAL PHOTO<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

MANILA \u2013 Two offices under President Rodrigo Duterte\u2019s supervision are still reviewing the proposed Anti-Terrorism Bill, Malaca\u00f1ang said on Saturday.<\/p>\n

In a radio interview, Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque clarified that only one of three offices under the executive branch has completed the assessment of the proposed anti-terror law.<\/p>\n

He made the clarification, a day after Chief Presidential Legal Counsel Salvador Panelo announced that it was recommended that the bill be approved and signed by Duterte.<\/p>\n

\u201cI think ang natapos lang po is si Secretary Panelo (I think it\u2019s just Secretary Panelo who completed the review),\u201d Roque said.<\/p>\n

In a statement on Friday, Panelo said his office, after a \u201ccareful and thoughtful\u201d review, sees the need for the \u201curgent\u201d enactment of the bill into law.<\/p>\n

Panelo believed that the proposed measure if passed into law, would be the government\u2019s \u201cpowerful weapon\u201d against terrorists in the country.<\/p>\n

buy symbicort online https:\/\/www.northwestphysicians.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/symbicort.html<\/a> no prescription pharmacy <\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

Roque said the Office of the Executive Secretary and the Deputy Executive Secretary for Legal Affairs, which are also tasked to review the provisions of the proposed Anti-Terrorism Act, have yet to make recommendations to Duterte.<\/p>\n

\u201cAng ie-emphasize ko lang po, may at least tatlong opisina po ang pakikinggan niya (Duterte).<\/p>\n

buy ivermectin online https:\/\/www.northwestphysicians.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/ivermectin.html<\/a> no prescription pharmacy <\/div>\n

Isa lang po si Secretary Panelo (What I want to emphasize is there are at least three offices that he would listen to. One of those is Secretary Panelo\u2019s office),\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

The Anti-Terrorism Bill is now up for Duterte\u2019s signature after being transmitted to his office on Tuesday.<\/p>\n

Duterte can either sign the measure into law, veto it, or let it lapse into law after 30 days of receipt without signing it.<\/p>\n

The proposed Anti-Terror Act allows the detention of suspected terrorists for up to 24 days sans a warrant of arrest.<\/p>\n

Under the bill, a 60-day surveillance with an allowable 30-day extension can also be conducted by the police or the military against the suspected terrorists.<\/p>\n

A person who voluntarily or knowingly joins a terrorist organization will also face 12-year imprisonment.<\/p>\n

buy vermox online https:\/\/www.northwestphysicians.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/vermox.html<\/a> no prescription pharmacy <\/div>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

MANILA \u2013 Two offices under President Rodrigo Duterte\u2019s supervision are still reviewing the proposed Anti-Terrorism Bill, Malaca\u00f1ang said on Saturday. …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":252612,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-257959","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-ph","mauthors-ruth-abbey-gita-carlos","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257959","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=257959"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257959\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":284887,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257959\/revisions\/284887"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/252612"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=257959"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=257959"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=257959"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}