{"id":250242,"date":"2020-03-27T21:01:37","date_gmt":"2020-03-28T01:01:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=250242"},"modified":"2020-03-27T21:01:37","modified_gmt":"2020-03-28T01:01:37","slug":"trudeau-seeking-u-s-decision-on-troops-at-border-calls-possibility-a-mistake","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2020\/03\/27\/trudeau-seeking-u-s-decision-on-troops-at-border-calls-possibility-a-mistake\/","title":{"rendered":"Trudeau seeking U.S. decision on troops at border; calls possibility a mistake"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
\u201cWe continue to engage closely in back and forths with the American administration on many, many issues around the border, and when we have more information, we’ll share it,\u201d Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Friday during this daily televised briefing to Canadians on the pandemic. (File Photo<\/a>: Justin Trudeau\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

OTTAWA \u2014 Historic uncertainty hovered over the world’s longest undefended border on Friday as the spectre of President Donald Trump’s musing about deploying military forces to America’s northern frontier with Canada lingered.<\/p>\n

A full day after Trump first publicly discussed the possibility during remarks at the White House, as the COVID-19 pandemic mushroomed in the U.S., Canadian officials were pressing their American counterparts to find out what military plan \u2014 if any \u2014 was taking shape and how it might affect Canada. Throughout, the Trudeau cabinet has remained in close contact with Kirsten Hillman, its newly-appointed ambassador to the U.S.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe continue to engage closely in back and forths with the American administration on many, many issues around the border, and when we have more information, we’ll share it,\u201d Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Friday during this daily televised briefing to Canadians on the pandemic.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe have expressed to the United States that it would be a mistake to position troops near the Canadian border, and we certainly hope that they’re not going to go through with that.\u201d<\/p>\n

Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland was also forceful in denouncing the idea, saying she’d been keeping in close contact with Hillman on Thursday and Friday.<\/p>\n

\u201cCanada has continued to express clearly and forcefully its view that there is no logical reason to militarize our border with the United States and we have been very clear also that such an action would damage our relationship,\u201d Freeland said.<\/p>\n

Ottawa was still scrambling to react to the U.S. proposal, which appeared aimed at bolstering the work of its own domestic border service. But the potential scope or extent of any U.S. plan to deploy its military along the world’s longest undefended border remained unexplained.<\/p>\n

The two countries already have a mutual ban in place on non-essential travel, but the movement of trade, commerce and cross-border workers has been allowed to continue.<\/p>\n

U.S. President Donald Trump added to the confusion in remarks at the White House late Thursday afternoon, when he said \u2014 without any explanation \u2014 that the U.S. already has troops \u201calong the border\u201d with Canada.<\/p>\n

Trump then went on a riff about one of his favourite topics \u2014 tariffs \u2014 and restated old concerns about cheap Chinese steel coming into the U.S. market from Canada.<\/p>\n

\u201cYou know, we have a lot of things coming in from Canada. We have trade \u2014 some illegal trade that we don’t like. We have very strong sanctions on some. We have very strong tariffs on dumping steel. And we don’t like steel coming through our border that’s been dumped in Canada so they can avoid the tariff,\u201d said Trump.<\/p>\n

Canada and Mexico have resolved a major standoff with the Trump administration after it imposed punitive tariffs on their steel and aluminum exports to the U.S. The U.S. had concerns about countries such as China using Canada and Mexico as a conduit to dump cheap steel into the American market. Canada and Mexico are now closely monitoring their foreign metals imports to avoid that from happening \u2014 and to prevent the U.S. from reinstating tariffs.<\/p>\n

\u201cYou know, I charge a lot of tariff for the steel. And it’s been great for our steel companies because now they can really go \u2014 you look at what’s happened with steel. It’s been pretty incredible. But we’ve taken in billions and billions of dollars in tariffs on steel, and much of it comes in from China, but they can come through the Canadian border, too,\u201d said Trump.<\/p>\n

Earlier Thursday, Freeland noted that countries around the world, including Canada, have been responding with uncharacteristic speed and urgency to an escalating global emergency, which involves discussing any and all measures, no matter how drastic, even if they don’t come to fruition.<\/p>\n

The current, mutual ban on non-essential travel by Canada and the U.S. reflects that the countries realize the economic importance of avoiding a complete shutdown at the border. For Canada, keeping trade moving is essential \u2014 the U.S. is its largest trading partner, as the economies of the two countries are deeply intertwined.<\/p>\n

Trudeau reiterated Friday in Ottawa that Canada and the U.S. have the longest unmilitarized border in the world and it is in the interests of both countries to keep it that way.<\/p>\n

Trump has long been seized with securing his country’s southern border with Mexico, and has recently been talking about fortifying those efforts under the pretence of protecting Americans from the novel coronavirus.<\/p>\n

Trump has also made it clear that in an election year, he is eager for a return to economic normalcy, and sooner rather than later. The April 12 Easter weekend is his hoped-for timeline, a date that has left public-health officials incredulous.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, Freeland said Friday she is holding other \u201curgent\u201d discussions with U.S. officials over concerns that American border agents could deport asylum seekers on the Canada-U.S. border turned back by Canada under the new border agreement.<\/p>\n

On Monday, the U.S. announced a 30-day agreement with both Canada and Mexico that includes immediately returning any illegal migrants to the countries from which they arrived, or to their countries of origin if that isn’t possible, rather than holding them at U.S. facilities.<\/p>\n

Trudeau said last week anyone crossing between the two countries on foot to claim asylum will be turned away as part of the broader deal to close the border to all but non-essential traffic, raising questions about whether they would be returned to their country of origin.<\/p>\n

Freeland said Canada’s international obligations on refugees, include a commitment to \u201cnon-refoulement\u201d \u2014 not sending refugees back to countries where they could face torture or persecution.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe are aware of the problems of refoulement and it was, and continues to be, important for Canada to have assurances that that would not happen to people returned to the United States,\u201d Freeland said.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is important for us to abide by our international commitments when it comes to refugees and we are very alive to concerns around refoulement.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u2014 with files from Teresa Wright<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

OTTAWA \u2014 Historic uncertainty hovered over the world’s longest undefended border on Friday as the spectre of President Donald Trump’s …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":248769,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-250242","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250242","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=250242"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250242\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":250243,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250242\/revisions\/250243"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/248769"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=250242"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=250242"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=250242"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}