{"id":247073,"date":"2020-03-04T22:57:34","date_gmt":"2020-03-05T03:57:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=247073"},"modified":"2020-03-04T22:57:34","modified_gmt":"2020-03-05T03:57:34","slug":"court-rejects-move-to-put-passenger-rights-rules-on-hold-pending-appeal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2020\/03\/04\/court-rejects-move-to-put-passenger-rights-rules-on-hold-pending-appeal\/","title":{"rendered":"Court rejects move to put passenger rights rules on hold pending appeal"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_247075\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-247075\" style=\"width: 1920px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/passenger-362169_1920.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-247075\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/passenger-362169_1920.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1920\" height=\"1280\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/passenger-362169_1920.jpg 1920w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/passenger-362169_1920-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/passenger-362169_1920-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/passenger-362169_1920-1024x683.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1920px) 100vw, 1920px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-247075\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Tabled in May 2017, the passenger bill of rights aims to beef up compensation for travellers subjected to delayed flights and damaged luggage. (Pixabay photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The Federal Court of Appeal has dismissed an attempt by airlines to suspend the country&#8217;s new passenger rights charter until an appeal of the regulations is heard.<\/p>\n<p>A judge turned down a motion by the International Air Transport Association trade group \u2014 which counts Air Canada and WestJet Airlines Ltd. among its 300-odd members \u2014 and 13 other major carriers to freeze the traveller protections while the appeal is being dealt with.<\/p>\n<p>Justice David Near said Tuesday the appellants did not show on a balance of probabilities that the rules would cause irreparable harm.<\/p>\n<p>Tabled in May 2017, the passenger bill of rights aims to beef up compensation for travellers subjected to delayed flights and damaged luggage.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI&#8217;m very glad the court made that decision,\u201d Transport Minister Marc Garneau said in an interview Wednesday. \u201cWe did our homework&#8230;and we tried to come up with something that we felt was fair to both passengers as well as to the airlines.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The issue came to the forefront after a 2017 incident in which two Montreal-bound Air Transat jets were diverted to Ottawa because of bad weather and were held on the tarmac for up to six hours, leading some passengers to call 911.<\/p>\n<p>While some travellers and advocates say the rules allow for loopholes, the appellants argue the regulations exceed the Canadian Transportation Agency&#8217;s authority and contravene the Montreal Convention, a multilateral treaty.<\/p>\n<p>AirHelp, a Berlin-based passenger rights company, has said the exemptions for weather or mechanical malfunctions don&#8217;t encourage airlines to avoid \u201cso-called undiscovered issues\u201d and allows them to sidestep compensation by pointing to malfunctions on the tarmac.<\/p>\n<p>Other consumer rights advocates say getting monetary compensation is tough because it requires passengers to present evidence that is in the hands of the airline.<\/p>\n<p>The rules rely on travellers filing complaints with airlines or, as a last resort, the Canadian Transportation Agency.<\/p>\n<p>New complaints about air travel to the transportation watchdog have risen more than 800 per cent over the past four years, hitting 7,650 in 2018-19.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cCanadians are using them,\u201d Garneau said of the freshly delineated rights. \u201cSometimes they&#8217;re having a different interpretation from the airlines and those things are getting worked out through the Canadian Transportation Agency.<\/p>\n<p>Garneau characterized the ongoing limbo as \u201cthe shake-down period, and eventually we&#8217;ll come out of that with everyone clearly understand(ing) those rules, based on precedent.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Transportation agency chair Scott Streiner has said he is satisfied with the airlines&#8217; overall efforts to comply with the first wave of rules and expected the same in the 2020.<\/p>\n<p>The federal appeal court also granted a motion by passenger rights advocate Gabor Lukacs to intervene in the case.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe proposed intervener would defend the interests of airline passengers in a way that the parties cannot&#8230;and that the proposed intervention would be of assistance to the court in deciding the appeal,\u201d the judge wrote.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI am very pleased by the court&#8217;s ruling,\u201d Lukacs said. \u201cThis is a very significant judicial recognition of the work that we have been doing for the past 12 years.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The new rules allow passengers to be compensated up to $2,400 if they are bumped from a flight and receive up to $2,300 for lost or damaged luggage.<\/p>\n<p>Compensation of up to $1,000 for delays and other payments for cancelled flights took effect on Dec. 15.<\/p>\n<p>The International Air Transport Association did not immediately reply to a request for comment.<\/p>\n<p>With files from Jordan Press<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Federal Court of Appeal has dismissed an attempt by airlines to suspend the country&#8217;s new passenger rights charter until &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":247075,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-247073","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247073","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=247073"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247073\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":247076,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247073\/revisions\/247076"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/247075"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=247073"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=247073"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=247073"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}