{"id":24658,"date":"2014-09-03T15:10:44","date_gmt":"2014-09-03T07:10:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=24658"},"modified":"2014-09-03T19:12:34","modified_gmt":"2014-09-03T11:12:34","slug":"aquino-got-justice-malacanang","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2014\/09\/03\/aquino-got-justice-malacanang\/","title":{"rendered":"Aquino got justice \u2013 Malaca\u00f1ang"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"President<\/a>
President Benigno S. Aquino III shares a light moment with Ayala Corporation chairman and chief executive officer Jaime Augusto Zobel de Ayala and Finance Secretary Cesar Purisima during the courtesy call of the ASEAN Business Club at the Reception Hall of the Malaca\u00f1an Palace on Wednesday (May 21, 2014). The ASEAN Business Club is an association of the chief executives of ASEAN\u2019s most important business enterprises, who are committed to the advancement of the ASEAN agenda. (Photo by Benhur Arcayan \/ Malaca\u00f1ang Photo Bureau)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

MANILA \u2013 Malaca\u00f1ang said President Aquino got justice following the recent junking of the impeachment complaints against him.<\/p>\n

Citing insufficiency of substance, the justice committee of the House of Representatives voted an identical 54-4 on all three impeachment complaints against the president.<\/p>\n

\u201cNote that the group that heard the impeachment complaint is called the committee on justice. So, if that was the decision of the committee of justice, perhaps we can say that that was the outcome of the process,\u201d Communications Secretary Herminio Coloma said in a statement.<\/p>\n

After a four-hour debate that involved heated arguments between Aquino\u2019s allies and critics, Iloilo Rep. Niel Tupas Jr.,chairman of the committee dismissed all the three complaints.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, endorsers of the complaints expressed dismay over the committee\u2019s decision.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis is a terrible day for the Filipino people,\u201d Bayan Muna Rep. Neri Colmenares, who endorsed the first impeachment complaint, told the committee.<\/p>\n

Despite Colmenares request to give the endorsers of the complaints an ample time to defend their charges, Tupas, who was prevailed upon by the Liberal Party-dominated committee, already started the voting on the complaints.<\/p>\n

\u201cThese are heavy and serious violations of the constitutional provision that \u2018No money shall be paid out of the treasury except in pursuance of an appropriation made by law,\u2019\u201d Colmenares said.<\/p>\n

\u201cMr. Aquino knowingly and intentionally violated the law prohibiting transfer of appropriation, according to the definition of savings under the law, in cross-border augmentation, and spending not covered by budget. For three years, he repeatedly continued this violation involving billions of pesos in funds,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Those who found not enough reason to impeachment the president, however, defended the committee\u2019s decision.<\/p>\n

Cagayan de Oro Rep. Rufus Rodriguez , who found no perversity in Aquino\u2019s actions said serious offense that \u201cstrikes at the very heart of the nation,\u201d must be considered before impeachment.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

MANILA \u2013 Malaca\u00f1ang said President Aquino got justice following the recent junking of the impeachment complaints against him. Citing insufficiency …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":21079,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1482,95],"tags":[3212,6408],"class_list":["post-24658","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-breaking","category-news-ph","tag-aquino","tag-impeachment","mauthors-lei-fontamillas","mauthors-philippine-canadian-inquirer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24658","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24658"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24658\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/21079"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24658"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24658"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24658"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}