{"id":246236,"date":"2020-02-26T19:11:20","date_gmt":"2020-02-27T00:11:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=246236"},"modified":"2020-02-26T19:11:20","modified_gmt":"2020-02-27T00:11:20","slug":"ph-temporarily-bans-travelers-from-s-korean-province","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2020\/02\/26\/ph-temporarily-bans-travelers-from-s-korean-province\/","title":{"rendered":"PH temporarily bans travelers from S. Korean province"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_244623\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-244623\" style=\"width: 1920px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/airport-2373727_1920.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-244623\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/airport-2373727_1920.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1920\" height=\"1280\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/airport-2373727_1920.jpg 1920w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/airport-2373727_1920-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/airport-2373727_1920-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/airport-2373727_1920-1024x683.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1920px) 100vw, 1920px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-244623\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">In the meantime, he said strict protocol with respect to travelers entering the country from these areas in South Korea will continue to be observed. (Pixabay photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong>MANILA\u00a0<\/strong>\u2013 The Philippine government on Wednesday announced that it has banned all travelers coming from North Gyeongsang province in South Korea to contain the spread of coronavirus disease (Covid-19).<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Inter-Agency Task Force on Emerging Infectious Diseases (IATF-EID) met today (Wednesday) and it has approved to impose a ban on the entry of travelers coming from the North Gyeongsang province of South Korea into the Philippine territory effective immediately,\u201d Presidential Spokesperson Salvador Panelo said in a Palace briefing.<\/p>\n<p>He said the task force is set to conduct a reassessment of the situation within 48 hours to determine if it is necessary to extend the travel ban to other areas in the East Asian country.<\/p>\n<p>In the meantime, he said strict protocol with respect to travelers entering the country from these areas in South Korea will continue to be observed.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Pinoy tourists barred from traveling to SoKor<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Filipino tourists are also banned from traveling to any part of South Korea, including Jeju Island.<\/p>\n<p>However, the\u00a0task force\u00a0has authorized Filipinos to travel to South Korea provided they are permanent residents thereof, leaving for study, or are overseas Filipino workers (OFWs), he said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201c<em>Tourists, lahat ng pupunta run<\/em>\u00a0[bawal] (All tourists bound for South Korea are prohibited) except for the three\u00a0<em>na binanggit ko kanina<\/em>\u00a0(which I mentioned earlier),\u201d he said when asked for clarification.<\/p>\n<p>Those allowed to travel to South Korea would have to execute and sign a declaration signifying their knowledge and understanding of the risk involved prior to their travel, he added.<\/p>\n<p>Panelo admitted that the temporary travel restriction is bound to affect tourism numbers since South Korea remains the country\u2019s top source market with a total of 1.98 million arrivals in 2019.<\/p>\n<p>However, he said the safety and security of the Filipinos here and abroad remain the government\u2019s primary concern.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt will be affected but as we always say, we have to secure the safety of those coming here and leaving this country to Korea,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, the government&#8217;s temporary travel ban on mainland China and its special administrative regions Hong Kong and Macao remains in effect.<\/p>\n<p>However, permanent residents, students, and OFWs are exempted from the ban.<\/p>\n<p>Taiwan was also placed under a temporary travel restriction but it was eventually lifted.<\/p>\n<p>Last week, Tourism Secretary Bernadette Romulo-Puyat said the Philippine government will reconsider the travel ban imposed on Hong Kong and Macao.<\/p>\n<p>She said the lifting would be based on the protocols of the two territories in containing the coronavirus disease (Covid-19).<\/p>\n<p>Reports showed as of Wednesday, there are 1,146 confirmed cases of Covid-19 in South Korea, the largest number of cases outside China.<\/p>\n<p>The vast majority of the new cases were in Daegu, the country&#8217;s fourth-largest city and the epicenter of the outbreak, and the neighboring province of North Gyeongsang.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA\u00a0\u2013 The Philippine government on Wednesday announced that it has banned all travelers coming from North Gyeongsang province in South &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":244623,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,16,95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-246236","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","mauthors-azer-parrocha","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246236","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=246236"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246236\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":246238,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246236\/revisions\/246238"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/244623"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=246236"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=246236"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=246236"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}