{"id":244911,"date":"2020-02-13T23:32:13","date_gmt":"2020-02-14T04:32:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=244911"},"modified":"2020-02-13T23:32:13","modified_gmt":"2020-02-14T04:32:13","slug":"trump-slams-ex-adviser-who-defended-key-impeachment-witness","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2020\/02\/13\/trump-slams-ex-adviser-who-defended-key-impeachment-witness\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump slams ex-adviser who defended key impeachment witness"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
The president’s comments came after Kelly defended Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, who was among the administration officials who raised concerns about Trump’s July phone call with Ukraine’s president. That call spurred the president’s impeachment trial, which ended in acquittal last week. (File Photo<\/a>: @realdonaldtrump\/Instagram<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

WASHINGTON \u2014 President Donald Trump on Thursday lashed out against former White House chief of staff John Kelly for being disloyal after he came to the defence of a former national security aide who offered key testimony in the impeachment inquiry.<\/p>\n

The president’s comments came after Kelly defended Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, who was among the administration officials who raised concerns about Trump’s July phone call with Ukraine’s president. That call spurred the president’s impeachment trial, which ended in acquittal last week.<\/p>\n

\u201cLike so many X’s, he misses the action & just can’t keep his mouth shut, which he actually has a military and legal obligation to do,\u201d Trump tweeted about Kelly. \u201cHis incredible wife, Karen, who I have a lot of respect for, once pulled me aside & said strongly that `John respects you greatly. When we are no longer here, he will only speak well of you.’ Wrong!\u201d<\/p>\n

Kelly, speaking at a public forum on Wednesday in Morristown, New Jersey, said that Vindman did exactly as he was trained in raising concerns to his superiors after hearing \u201cquestionable\u201d comments from Trump, according to a report by The Atlantic magazine. Vindman was ousted last week from his position as a Ukraine specialist detailed to the White House National Security Council.<\/p>\n

\u201cHe did exactly what we teach them to do from cradle to grave,\u201d said Kelly, a retired Marine general who served as Trump’s chief of staff from the summer of 2017 until early last year. \u201cHe went and told his boss what he just heard.\u201d<\/p>\n

Vindman was a key witness in Democrats’ impeachment inquiry of Trump.<\/p>\n

The Army officer was ousted from his NSC job last Friday, just two days after the Senate acquitted Trump on abuse of power and obstruction of Congress charges. He is to be reassigned by the Pentagon. His twin brother, Lt. Col. Yevgeny Vindman, who worked as an ethics lawyer at the NSC, also was ousted from his job and was re-assigned to the Army General Counsel’s Office.<\/p>\n

Kelly came to Vindman’s defence after Trump suggested this week that the Pentagon should review Vindman’s conduct in the Ukraine episode and potentially consider disciplinary action against him.<\/p>\n

Trump has insisted that his call to Zelenskiy was \u201cperfect.\u201d During the conversation, Trump asked Zelenskiy to do him \u201ca favour\u201d and look into former Vice-President Joe Biden and his son’s business dealings in Ukraine.<\/p>\n

Vindman testified that he raised his concerns inside the White House after concluding that Trump was inappropriately conditioning nearly $400 million in military aid to Ukraine on getting Zelenskiy to announce an investigation of his political rival.<\/p>\n

Kelly said at the forum that Vindman’s decision to raise his concerns was valid.<\/p>\n

\u201cThrough the Obama administration up until that phone call, the policy of the U.S. was militarily to support Ukraine in their defensive fight against ? the Russians,\u201d Kelly said. \u201cAnd so, when the president said that continued support would be based on X, that essentially changed. And that’s what that guy (Vindman) was most interested in.\u201d<\/p>\n

Trump initially tapped Kelly after the 2016 election to serve as his secretary of homeland security, before asking him to become his chief of staff. Kelly suggested at the forum he had some hesitation about joining the administration but ultimately decided to at the urging of his wife.<\/p>\n

\u201cI frankly think he needs you and people like you,\u201d Kelly recalled his wife telling him.<\/p>\n

White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said Thursday she was \u201cdisappointed\u201d by Kelly’s comments. She compared him to former national security adviser John Bolton, another top aide who was critical of Trump’s efforts to pressure Zelenskiy.<\/p>\n

\u201cI thought it was a little disingenuous,\u201d Grisham said in an interview on Fox New Channel’s \u201cFox & Friends\u201d \u201cIt’s interesting that he’s starting to poke his head out a little bit more, just like John Bolton, as we’re getting close to an election.\u201d<\/p>\n

Bolton, according to excerpts of a manuscript leaked to the media during the Senate impeachment trial, says Trump told him he was conditioning the release of military aid to Ukraine on whether its government would help investigate the Bidens.<\/p>\n

While they had vocal, sometimes heated, disagreements, Bolton defended Kelly in a tweet Thursday, calling him an \u201chonourable man.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cJohn and I have disagreed at times, as is commonplace at senior government levels, but he has always served his country faithfully,\u201d Bolton said. \u201cConservatives especially have a responsibility to reject baseless attacks upon him.\u201d<\/p>\n

Kelly did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

WASHINGTON \u2014 President Donald Trump on Thursday lashed out against former White House chief of staff John Kelly for being …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":200486,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-244911","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","mauthors-aamer-madhani","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244911","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=244911"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244911\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":244912,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244911\/revisions\/244912"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/200486"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=244911"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=244911"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=244911"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}