{"id":244880,"date":"2020-02-13T21:41:21","date_gmt":"2020-02-14T02:41:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=244880"},"modified":"2020-02-13T21:41:21","modified_gmt":"2020-02-14T02:41:21","slug":"cta-grants-p9-m-tax-refund-to-food-firm-dole","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2020\/02\/13\/cta-grants-p9-m-tax-refund-to-food-firm-dole\/","title":{"rendered":"CTA grants P9-M tax refund to food firm Dole"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_237266\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-237266\" style=\"width: 1440px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/1440px-FvfCTA0257_05.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-237266\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/1440px-FvfCTA0257_05.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1440\" height=\"1080\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/1440px-FvfCTA0257_05.jpg 1440w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/1440px-FvfCTA0257_05-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/1440px-FvfCTA0257_05-768x576.jpg 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/1440px-FvfCTA0257_05-1024x768.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1440px) 100vw, 1440px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-237266\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">FILE: Court of Tax Appeals of the Philippines located at Agham Road, National Government Center, Diliman, Quezon City in Metro Manila. (<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?curid=31944860\">Photo By Judgefloro &#8211; Own work, Public Domain<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong>MANILA<\/strong>\u00a0&#8212; The Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) has ruled in favor of the food firm Dole Fresh Fruit Company (DFFC) in a suit involving taxes paid by the company in 2013.<\/p>\n<p>In a 22-page decision dated Feb. 5 released on Thursday, the tax court&#8217;s Second Division through Associate Justice Cielito Mindaro-Grulla ordered the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) to grant a tax refund worth PHP9.03 million to the company.<\/p>\n<p>The amount represents DFFC&#8217;s erroneously paid capital gains tax from the sale of its shares of stock in Dole Philippines, Inc. (DPI) to Dole Asia Holdings Pte. Ltd. (DAHL), a Singaporean firm.<\/p>\n<p>The transaction involved 1,527,600 common shares sold for a purchase price of PHP105.69 million or 0.64 percent of DPI owned at the time by DFFC.<\/p>\n<p>Associate Justices Juanito Castaneda Jr. and Jean Marie Bacorro-Villena concurred.<\/p>\n<p>DFFC, which was formed under the laws of Nevada, United States on March 4, 2013, filed an application with the BIR&#8217;s Internal Tax Affairs Division to request confirmation that the transaction is exempt from capital gains tax under the RP-US Tax Treaty.<\/p>\n<p>While the request was pending on March 21, 2013, DFFC filed its capital gains tax return and paid capital gains taxes in the amount of PHP9.03 million.<\/p>\n<p>On April 5, 2013, the company finally secured the Certificate Authorizing Registration (CAR) and tax clearance on the sale of shares prompting it to file an application for tax credit\/refund to recover the erroneously paid capital gains taxes.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Generally, any gain by petitioner from the sale of shares in DPI should be subject to CGT. However, considering that the Philippines has a treaty with the US, the said income from the sale of shares may be exempted from income tax if the conditions set forth under the RP-US Tax Treaty are satisfied,&#8221; the court held<strong><em>.\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA\u00a0&#8212; The Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) has ruled in favor of the food firm Dole Fresh Fruit Company (DFFC) &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":237266,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-244880","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-business","mauthors-benjamin-pulta","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244880","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=244880"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244880\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":244882,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244880\/revisions\/244882"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/237266"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=244880"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=244880"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=244880"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}