{"id":244859,"date":"2020-02-13T20:47:52","date_gmt":"2020-02-14T01:47:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=244859"},"modified":"2020-02-13T20:47:52","modified_gmt":"2020-02-14T01:47:52","slug":"senate-probe-on-abs-cbns-franchise-compliance-pushed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2020\/02\/13\/senate-probe-on-abs-cbns-franchise-compliance-pushed\/","title":{"rendered":"Senate probe on ABS-CBN\u2019s franchise compliance pushed"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_199258\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-199258\" style=\"width: 960px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/Senate-building.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-199258\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/Senate-building.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"960\" height=\"720\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/Senate-building.jpg 960w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/Senate-building-768x576.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-199258\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">\u201cThis is part of the Senate&#8217;s oversight function over any franchise and not just ABS-CBN, as mandated by the Constitution and the Senate Rules,\u201d Poe said in a statement a day after filing her Senate Resolution 322. (File <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/senateph\/photos\/a.815377408486542\/2229446800412922\/?type=3&amp;amp;theater\">photo<\/a>: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/senateph\/\">Senate of the Philippines\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong>MANILA<\/strong>\u00a0&#8212; Senator Grace Poe on Thursday said she is pushing for a Senate probe on the alleged franchise violations of ABS-CBN Corporation despite a quo warranto petition filed against the broadcast network before the Supreme Court (SC).<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis is part of the Senate&#8217;s oversight function over any franchise and not just ABS-CBN, as mandated by the Constitution and the Senate Rules,\u201d Poe said in a statement a day after filing her Senate Resolution 322.<\/p>\n<p>The chairperson of the Senate Committee on Public Services said the resolution initiates the discussion of her panel on the compliance of ABS-CBN with the terms and conditions of its franchise \u201cand to allow all parties to air their side\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDue to the gravity of the allegations and its possible effects, the Committee has deemed it appropriate to lay the groundwork for a possible inquiry in the spirit of public interest,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>Poe likewise said the planned discussion in the Senate does not prevent any action in the House of Representatives or the SC due to the quo warranto petition.<\/p>\n<p>The Office of the Solicitor General claimed in a quo warranto petition filed last Monday that ABS-CBN violated the constitutional ban on foreign ownership and went \u201cbeyond the scope of its legislative franchise\u201d for \u201cbroadcasting for a fee,\u201d among others.<\/p>\n<p>Under the sub judice (under a judge) rule, public discussion on cases under judicial consideration may constitute interference with due process.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe issue on sub judice regarding legislative inquiries has long been resolved by the Supreme Court in Sabio vs. Gordon and in the cases that reiterate it: On-going judicial proceedings do not preclude congressional hearings in aid of legislation,\u201d Poe said.<\/p>\n<p>Senate President Vicente Sotto III and Senator Sherwin Gatchalian supported Poe\u2019s initiative.<\/p>\n<p>In a radio interview, Sotto said a resolution looking into the allegations \u201cis in order\u201d.<\/p>\n<p><em>\u201cMaganda para nga magkaroon din ng pagkakataon ang<\/em>\u00a0ABS CBN\u00a0<em>na maeksplika, at hindi kung ano yung naririnig lang, ano itong<\/em>\u00a0alleged violation\u00a0<em>na ito<\/em>\u00a0(It\u2019s good that ABS-CBN would also have the chance to explain, and not just what is just being heard, about the alleged violations),\u201d Sotto said.<\/p>\n<p>He said the Senate probe may also be a way for Poe to speed up the process if the network\u2019s franchise reaches the Senate.<\/p>\n<p>Under the law, the Senate cannot act on pending franchise bills unless the House approves it.<\/p>\n<p><em>\u201cPara hindi na humaba ang usapin, at saka hindi naman siya pwedeng mag-hearing tungkol sa<\/em>\u00a0franchise<em>\u00a0dahil wala pa sa amin<\/em>\u00a0(So the hearings would not take long, and besides, she cannot conduct hearings on the franchise since it is not yet transmitted to us),\u201d Sotto said.<\/p>\n<p>In a Senate interview, Gatchalian said he also supports the planned Senate probe since the venue could serve as a \u201cneutral ground\u201d to discover and analyze whether or not the allegations against the network are true.<\/p>\n<p>He pointed out that while Poe\u2019s resolution is not for a hearing for a franchise renewal, the performance and shortcomings of ABS-CBN may be discussed anyway, \u201cassuming the franchise reaches the Senate\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat is important is to find out if there are indeed, violations, how do we correct and prevent these violations, and if these violations can be grounds to revoke the franchise or not to renew it,\u201d Gatchalian said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA\u00a0&#8212; Senator Grace Poe on Thursday said she is pushing for a Senate probe on the alleged franchise violations of &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":199258,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-244859","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-ph","mauthors-jose-cielito-reganit","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244859","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=244859"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244859\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":244860,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244859\/revisions\/244860"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/199258"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=244859"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=244859"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=244859"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}