{"id":244735,"date":"2020-02-12T19:34:10","date_gmt":"2020-02-13T00:34:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=244735"},"modified":"2020-02-12T19:34:10","modified_gmt":"2020-02-13T00:34:10","slug":"palace-to-congress-set-aside-prrds-displeasure-vs-abs-cbn","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2020\/02\/12\/palace-to-congress-set-aside-prrds-displeasure-vs-abs-cbn\/","title":{"rendered":"Palace to Congress: Set aside PRRD\u2019s \u2018displeasure\u2019 vs. ABS-CBN"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_186250\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-186250\" style=\"width: 960px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/44245496_745713669097021_1947993871778578432_n.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-186250\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/44245496_745713669097021_1947993871778578432_n.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"960\" height=\"640\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/44245496_745713669097021_1947993871778578432_n.jpg 960w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/44245496_745713669097021_1947993871778578432_n-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/44245496_745713669097021_1947993871778578432_n-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/44245496_745713669097021_1947993871778578432_n-20x13.jpg 20w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-186250\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Speaking to Palace reporters, Panelo denied that Duterte was pressuring lawmakers to derail the franchise renewal of the embattled broadcasting firm. (File <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PresSpokespersonPH\/photos\/a.397841807217544\/745713662430355\/?type=3&amp;amp;theater\">Photo<\/a>: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PresSpokespersonPH\/\">Office of the Presidential Spokesperson\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>MANILA &#8212; Congress need not consider President Rodrigo Duterte\u2019s \u201cdispleasure\u201d against local media giant ABS-CBN Corp., Malaca\u00f1ang said on Wednesday.<\/p>\n<p>Presidential Spokesperson Salvador Panelo issued the statement after House legislative franchises vice chairperson and Isabela Rep. Antonio Albano said the apparent rift between Duterte and ABS-CBN is putting pressure on congressmen.<\/p>\n<p>Speaking to Palace reporters, Panelo denied that Duterte was pressuring lawmakers to derail the franchise renewal of the embattled broadcasting firm.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMembers of Congress know that the President does not entertain any call from them in relation to any measure being discussed in Congress, and for that matter, any subject matter that does not concern the President on matters affecting the presidency and the international interest, as well as the general welfare,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>Albano on Wednesday admitted that the pressure from Duterte is coming from the President\u2019s grievances against ABS-CBN\u2019s failure to run his campaign advertisements for the 2016 presidential race.<\/p>\n<p>The lawmaker added that ABS-CBN\u2019s \u201cwordings\u201d about the issues concerning its franchise renewal are also putting Congress in a bad light.<\/p>\n<p>Panelo stressed that Congress has the sole authority to decide on the fate of ABS-CBN.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cExclusive<em>\u00a0sa kanila \u2018yun<\/em>\u00a0(That\u2019s exclusive to them) &#8212; granting and renewing. And even assuming on the remotest possibility that he (Duterte) will veto it, it\u2019s still Congress (that will decide),\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>ABS-CBN\u2019s 25-year legislative franchise will expire on March 30, 2020 unless Congress and Duterte allow its extension for another 25 years.<\/p>\n<p>Senators and congressmen have to first pass a ratified bill on ABS-CBN\u2019s franchise before Duterte can decide on it.<\/p>\n<p>Panelo said Congress can overturn Duterte\u2019s decision in the event that the Chief Executive wields his veto power on the franchise renewal of the local media giant.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThey can override the President under the Constitution,\u201d he said. \u201cIt\u2019s up to the President. But even assuming that he\u2019d veto it, Congress can always override (it) by two-thirds vote. So whatever angle you look at it, it\u2019s Congress (that has the final say).\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The 1987 Constitution allows lawmakers to override the President\u2019s veto. The vetoed bill can still become a law, if two-third of members of Congress vote in its favor.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0SC can hear complaint vs. ABS-CBN<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Amid issues besetting ABS-CBN\u2019s franchise renewal, Solicitor General Jose Calida on Monday filed before the Supreme Court quo warranto petition, seeking the nullification of the franchises of ABS-CBN.<\/p>\n<p>Calida accused the broadcasting firm of violating the Constitution when it allowed foreign investors to take part in its ownership by issuing Philippine Deposit Receipts through ABS-CBN Holdings Corp.<\/p>\n<p>However, constitutional lawyer Tony La Vi\u00f1a in an interview with CNN Philippines said the high court where the petition was filed is the \u201cwrong venue.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But Panelo said the Supreme Court has the jurisdiction to handle the case concerning ABS-CBN\u2019s franchise.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cUnder the Constitution, the Supreme Court can act on any controversy when it involves grave abuse of discretion, whatever.\u00a0<em>Nandoon eh. Pasok lahat sa<\/em>\u00a0Supreme Court (The violation is there. It can be discussed before the Supreme Court),\u201d Panelo said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA &#8212; Congress need not consider President Rodrigo Duterte\u2019s \u201cdispleasure\u201d against local media giant ABS-CBN Corp., Malaca\u00f1ang said on Wednesday. &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":186250,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,16,95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-244735","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","mauthors-ruth-abbey-gita-carlos","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244735","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=244735"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244735\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":244736,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244735\/revisions\/244736"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/186250"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=244735"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=244735"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=244735"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}