{"id":244265,"date":"2020-02-07T01:19:17","date_gmt":"2020-02-07T06:19:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=244265"},"modified":"2020-02-07T01:19:17","modified_gmt":"2020-02-07T06:19:17","slug":"mcconnell-remaking-senate-in-age-of-trump-impeachment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2020\/02\/07\/mcconnell-remaking-senate-in-age-of-trump-impeachment\/","title":{"rendered":"McConnell remaking Senate in age of Trump, impeachment"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_244266\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-244266\" style=\"width: 960px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/McConnell-remaking-Senate-in-age-of-Trump-impeachment.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-244266\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/McConnell-remaking-Senate-in-age-of-Trump-impeachment.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"960\" height=\"638\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/McConnell-remaking-Senate-in-age-of-Trump-impeachment.jpg 960w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/McConnell-remaking-Senate-in-age-of-Trump-impeachment-300x199.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/McConnell-remaking-Senate-in-age-of-Trump-impeachment-768x510.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-244266\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">In the aftermath of only the third presidential impeachment trial in U.S. history, McConnell&#8217;s power over the Senate is now without doubt. His approach reflects the times of the Trump era, but also is shaping them. (File <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/mitchmcconnell\/photos\/a.126004557438244\/2244760698895942\/?type=3&amp;theater\">photo<\/a>: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/mitchmcconnell\/\">Senator Mitch McConnell\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p style=\"background: white\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">WASHINGTON \u2014 Long before Donald Trump&#8217;s impeachment landed in the Senate, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell had one piece of advice for the president: Focus on the House.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">Gin it up. Use maximum effort. Make sure Republicans are united. And leave the Senate to him.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">The Republican leader encouraged the president not to turn attention on wayward GOP senators, like Mitt Romney, who were \u201ctroubled\u201d by Trump&#8217;s actions toward Ukraine, but to stir the partisan passions of the House.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">It was the GOP leader&#8217;s central strategy to produce as partisan an impeachment as possible &#8212; too polarizing for any centrists to touch &#8212; to secure Republican acquittal in the Senate.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">\u201cHe understood right from the start, this was crooked politics,\u201d said Trump, singling McConnell out for praise Thursday at the White House. \u201cYou did a fantastic job.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">In the aftermath of only the third presidential impeachment trial in U.S. history, McConnell&#8217;s power over the Senate is now without doubt. His approach reflects the times of the Trump era, but also is shaping them.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">Even before the senators even took the oath to uphold \u201cimpartial justice,\u201d it was all but over. The Senate would have nowhere near the two-thirds majority needed to convict the president. McConnell announced he was not an impartial juror, but one working closely with the White House, and few strayed from his plan for speedy acquittal.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">The Kentucky Republican may be less \u201cMaster of the Senate,\u201d as historian Robert Caro indelibly labeled Lyndon B. Johnson, than master of a Senate that is being transformed in the age of Trump.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">McConnell&#8217;s political brand centres on being an institutionalist, a keeper of traditions of the Senate he yearned to join since young adulthood. Yet in leading the majority, he is breaking old norms, introducing new ones and capitalizing on Trump&#8217;s hold over the party.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">Much like the way he rewrote the Senate rules to ensure confirmation of Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court on largely party-line votes, McConnell became the architect of a presidential impeachment trial that drifted from precedent. It was first without new witnesses or Senate deliberations, a shift for the chamber long heralded as the world&#8217;s greatest deliberative body.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">Far from preserving the Senate&#8217;s historic role, McConnell is demonstrably changing it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">\u201cMitch McConnell, from the beginning, sided with the president in conceiving the entire impeachment process as illegitimate,\u201d said Timothy Naftali, a clinical professor of history at New York University, and co-author of a book on impeachment.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">The Senate is often referred to as a cooling saucer, tempering the House heat. McConnell drew on that tradition to impress on senators their historic role in cooling the House&#8217;s partisan passions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">\u201cHouse Democrats may have descended into pure factionalism, but the United States Senate must not,\u201d he said on the eve of the trial.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">\u201cThe Senate was designed to stabilize our institutions. To break partisan fevers. To stop short-term passions from destroying our long-term future,\u201d McConnell told them.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">After McConnell encouraged the president to fire-up partisan fervour in the House to ensure a party-line impeachment vote in December, the Senate followed suit, delivering the first party-line presidential acquittal in the nation&#8217;s history.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">\u201cThe passions that he should have been cooling in the Senate were the Republican partisan passions of the House,\u201d Naftali said.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">Romney was the only Republican to cross party lines to convict.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">Ahead of the trial, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said he tried three times to engage McConnell on terms before the House&#8217;s articles of impeachment were transmitted to the Senate. But he says he was rebuffed.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">\u201cI said, Mitch, whenever your&#8217;re ready, I want to sit down and talk,\u201d Schumer told The Associated Press. \u201cI got no bites.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">When McConnell presented GOP senators with his own plan for organizing the trial, he found little dissent. He had been discussing it privately with them for months. The main objection was his proposed 12-hour sessions, so a hand-scribbled change allowed for shorter days. It was an easy fix.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">By the time the trial was ready to begin, \u201cHe&#8217;s already finished,\u201d said Josh Holmes, a former McConnell aide. \u201cIt&#8217;s the hallmark of his career.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">It wasn&#8217;t all McConnell&#8217;s doing that brought Republicans in line. Trump maintains an extraordinary hold on his party. And Democrats own partisan passions against the president made it easier for Republicans to defend him.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">The House approved the articles of impeachment in December on Speaker Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s disciplined timeline, resulting in in the quickest, most partisan impeachment vote in history.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">Once the trial began, GOP senators soured on the first day when Schumer protested McConnell&#8217;s refusal to allow more witnesses, forcing a series of midnight votes that some Republicans saw as overtly partisan.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">When Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., asked Chief Justice John Roberts during the trial if he would cast a tie-breaking vote, one key centrist, GOP Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, was done.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">\u201cEnough,\u201d she said later, announcing she would not vote to convict, blaming all sides for what she viewed as a new partisan low.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">Trent Lott, the Republican Senate leader during then-President Bill Clinton&#8217;s impeachment two decades ago, acknowledges times are different than when his party joined with Democrats to acquit the president of charges stemming from a sex scandal at the White House.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">\u201cOne thing that&#8217;s different we had a centre,\u201d Lott said in an interview. \u201cThe centre has just disappeared.\u201d&#8217;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">What McConnell rarely did, though, throughout the months long impeachment inquiry, was publicly dispute the facts of the case against Trump.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">Democrats say Trump pressured a fragile ally, Ukraine, to conduct political investigations of Democratic rival Joe Biden, or risk losing its U.S. military aid. He then obstructed Congress as it probed a whistleblower&#8217;s complaint about it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">A half-dozen Republican senators spoke of their unease with the president&#8217;s actions. \u201cWrong,\u201d said Tennessee Sen. Lamar Alexander. \u201cShameful,\u201d said Murkowski. Susan Collins, Marco Rubio, Rob Portman and others called his behaviour inappropriate.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">But they also said the charges didn&#8217;t rise to impeachable offences and it would be better to let the voters in the 2020 election decide. McConnell and Trump both face re-election in fall.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">Ahead of Wednesday&#8217;s vote, McConnell told his colleagues, \u201cThe United States Senate was made for moments like this.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: white;text-align: start\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\">Then, without further debate, the Senate voted to acquit.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>WASHINGTON \u2014 Long before Donald Trump&#8217;s impeachment landed in the Senate, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell had one piece of advice &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":244266,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-244265","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","mauthors-lisa-mascaro","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244265","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=244265"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244265\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":244267,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244265\/revisions\/244267"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/244266"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=244265"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=244265"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=244265"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}