{"id":242752,"date":"2020-01-21T19:50:06","date_gmt":"2020-01-22T00:50:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=242752"},"modified":"2020-01-24T01:18:19","modified_gmt":"2020-01-24T06:18:19","slug":"prrds-net-satisfaction-rating-soars-to-record-high-excellent","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2020\/01\/21\/prrds-net-satisfaction-rating-soars-to-record-high-excellent\/","title":{"rendered":"PRRD&#8217;s net satisfaction rating soars to record-high \u2018excellent\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_242753\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-242753\" style=\"width: 1242px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/sws-survey.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-242753\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/sws-survey.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1242\" height=\"870\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/sws-survey.jpg 1242w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/sws-survey-300x210.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/sws-survey-768x538.jpg 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/sws-survey-1024x717.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1242px) 100vw, 1242px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-242753\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">(PNA photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong>MANILA<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 Public satisfaction with President Rodrigo Duterte\u2019s work performance reached a fresh record-high in the September to December 2019 period, according to the latest survey released by pollster Social Weather Stations (SWS) on Monday.<\/p>\n<p>The December 13 to 16 poll by SWS revealed that 82 percent of adult Filipinos are satisfied with Duterte\u2019s performance, while only 10 percent are dissatisfied.<\/p>\n<p>Only 8 percent could not say whether they are satisfied or not, SWS noted.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cCompared to September 2019, gross satisfaction with President Duterte rose by 4 points from 78 percent, gross undecided fell by 1 point from 9 percent, and gross dissatisfaction fell by 3 points from 13 percent,\u201d the poll said.<\/p>\n<p>The survey results yielded a net satisfaction score of \u201cexcellent\u201d +72, up by seven points from September 2019\u2019s \u201cvery good\u201d +65.<\/p>\n<p>The poll results also showed the President\u2019s \u201cnew personal record that surpassed the previous record \u2018very good\u2019 +68 in June 2019,\u201d SWS said.<\/p>\n<p>The seven-point rise in Duterte&#8217;s net satisfaction rating was due to increases in Balance Luzon (\u201cvery good\u201d +66 from \u201cvery good\u201d +54), the Visayas (\u201cexcellent\u201d +69 from \u201cexcellent\u201d +74), and Mindanao (\u201cexcellent\u201d +81 from \u201cexcellent\u201d +76), combined with a steady score in Metro Manila (\u201cvery good\u201d +66).<\/p>\n<p>Net satisfaction with Duterte\u2019s performance also rose by nine points in urban (\u201cexcellent\u201d +75 from \u201cvery good\u201d +66) and five points in rural areas (\u201cvery good\u201d +69 from \u201cvery good\u201d +64).<\/p>\n<div dir=\"auto\">The President\u2019s net satisfaction also rose among classes ABC (\u201cexcellent\u201d +76 to \u201cexcellent\u201d +70), D (\u201cexcellent\u201d +72 from \u201cvery good\u201d +66), and E (\u201cexcellent\u201d +71 from \u201cvery good\u201d +57).<\/p>\n<p>There was also an increased net satisfaction among men (\u201cexcellent\u201d +73 from \u201cvery good\u201d +66) and women (\u201cexcellent\u201d +71 from \u201cvery good\u201d +64), as well as among age groups 18 to 24 (\u201cexcellent\u201d +73 from \u201cvery good\u201d +64), 25 to 37 (\u201cvery good\u201d +67 from \u201cvery good\u201d +64), 35 to 44 (\u201cexcellent\u201d +78 from \u201cvery good\u201d +63), 45 to 54 (\u201cvery good\u201d +64 from \u201cvery good\u201d +63), and 55 and above (\u201cexcellent\u201d +77 from \u201cvery good\u201d +68).<\/p>\n<p>Duterte&#8217;s net satisfaction rating also rose by one to \u201cexcellent\u201d from \u201cvery good\u201d among elementary school (+78 from +60), high school graduates (+70 from +67), and college graduates (+73 from +67).<\/p>\n<p>It stayed very good among non-elementary school graduates, at +64 in December, down by 1 point from +65 in September.<\/p>\n<p><strong>52% expect Duterte\u2019s all promises fulfilled<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The same SWS survey found that 52 percent of adult Filipinos are expecting the Chief Executive to fulfill \u201call or nearly all\/most of his promises.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Respondents were asked: \u201cIn your opinion, how many of the promises of President Rody Duterte can be fulfilled? [All or nearly all of the promises, Most of the promises, A few of the promises, Almost none or none of the promises])&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>A total of 16 percent expressed confidence that Duterte can live up to \u201call or nearly all\u201d of his promises, 36 percent said \u201cmost\u201d promises will be fulfilled, 42 percent believed only a \u201cfew\u201d will be carried out, while the remaining 5 percent answered \u201cnone or almost none.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe latest proportion of 52 percent expecting nearly all\/most of President Duterte&#8217;s promises to be fulfilled is 4 points above the 48 percent (13 percent all or nearly all, 35 percent most) in December 2018,\u201d SWS said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhen first asked in June 2016, 63 percent expected nearly all\/most of his promises to be fulfilled, before it declined to 56 percent in September 2016 and 52 percent in March 2017,\u201d it added.<\/p><\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\"><\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\"><strong>72% worry a \u2018great deal\u2019 about Duterte\u2019s health<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The poll also revealed that 72 percent of adult Filipinos expressed worry over the health of the 74-year-old President.<\/p>\n<p>A total of 25 percent worried a \u201cgreat deal\u201d while the other 47 percent are \u201csomewhat worried.\u201d Only 28 percent said they are not worried, with 13 percent being \u201cnot worried at all and the other 15 percent being \u201csomewhat not worried.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>SWS the results were similar to June 2019 poll which showed that 74 percent were worried and 26 percent were not worried about the President\u2019s health.<\/p>\n<p>The latest poll also bared that 61 percent said Duterte\u2019s state of health is \u201ca public matter, that is why the public should be informed of everything about this.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Only 37 percent believed that the Chief Executive\u2019s health condition is a \u201cprivate matter, that is why the public does not need to be informed of everything about this.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Around 1,200 adult Filipinos were interviewed using sampling error margins of \u00b13 percentage points for national percentages, and \u00b16 percentage points each for Metro Manila, Balance Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao.<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA\u00a0\u2014 Public satisfaction with President Rodrigo Duterte\u2019s work performance reached a fresh record-high in the September to December 2019 period, &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":225841,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,54365,16,95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-242752","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-instagram","category-news","category-news-ph","mauthors-ruth-abbey-gita-carlos","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242752","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=242752"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242752\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":242754,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242752\/revisions\/242754"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/225841"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=242752"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=242752"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=242752"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}