{"id":242506,"date":"2020-01-17T21:22:53","date_gmt":"2020-01-18T02:22:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=242506"},"modified":"2020-01-17T21:22:53","modified_gmt":"2020-01-18T02:22:53","slug":"review-ndrrmc-law-before-creating-new-dept-solon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2020\/01\/17\/review-ndrrmc-law-before-creating-new-dept-solon\/","title":{"rendered":"Review NDRRMC law before creating new dep’t: solon"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n
\"\"<\/a>
Lacson said this would be better than creating a separate DDR, which would create its own problems in funding and personnel requirements. (PNA file photo by Avito C. Dalan)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

MANILA\u00a0— Amid the clamor of several lawmakers for the creation of a Department of Disaster Resilience (DDR) to oversee disaster management, Senator Panfilo Lacson on Friday said it would be better to revisit and strengthen the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act of 2011 (RA 10121) first before creating a separate department.<\/p>\n

In a radio interview, Lacson pointed out that RA 10121, which created the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (NDRRMC), has a sunset provision which states that the law should be revisited \u201cwithin five years, or as the need arises\u201d to assess its accomplishments, as well as its defects, to legislate amendments to ensure its effectiveness.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe review should have been done in 2016. But until now, a joint congressional oversight committee that would conduct the review as provided by law has not yet been constituted. It\u2019s long overdue,\u201d he said, noting that problems faced by the NDRRMC could have been addressed if the law is reviewed.<\/p>\n

He said foremost among them is the lack of a dedicated office, as the Council is composed of Cabinet members.<\/p>\n

But the implementing arm of the NDRRMC is the Office of Civil Defense (OCD), which Lacson noted, seconds its personnel from its mother agency, the Department of National Defense (DND).<\/p>\n

\u201cKaramihan<\/em>\u00a0casual.\u00a0Eh ang<\/em>\u00a0organization\u00a0nila<\/em>\u00a0down to municipal, or\u00a0ang iba<\/em>\u00a0regional\u00a0at<\/em>\u00a0provincial. So\u00a0ganoon kahirap ang trabaho. Bago maka<\/em>-react\u00a0sa kalamidad papunta sa<\/em>\u00a0rehab and reconstruction,\u00a0napakatagal<\/em>\u00a0(They are mostly casual employees. But their responsibility is down to the municipal level, or regional and provincial. That\u2019s how difficult their work is. It takes a lot of time before they can react to a calamity up to rehabilitation and reconstruction),\u201d Lacson said.<\/p>\n

The senator said when session resumes on Monday (Jan. 20), he will make a manifestation on plenary to urge the Senate to constitute its panel in the joint oversight committee for RA 10121 for the overdue review.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe can the coordinate with the House of Representatives for them to constitute their own panel so that we can already start reviewing the NDRRMC law,\u201d Lacson said.<\/p>\n

Better than creating another department<\/strong><\/p>\n

Lacson said this would be better than creating a separate DDR, which would create its own problems in funding and personnel requirements.<\/p>\n

Hee said the creation of many departments is inconsistent with the policy of President Rodrigo Duterte on rightsizing.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe have just created the Department of Human Settlements, the Department of Information and Communications Technology. There are also proposals for a Department of Overseas Filipino Workers. So there goes the inconsistency\u00a0sa<\/em>\u00a0policy.\u00a0Ano ba talaga gusto natin? Gusto natin mag<\/em>-rightsize\u00a0pero gusto nating mag<\/em>-create\u00a0ng katakot-takot na<\/em>\u00a0department (What do we want? We want to rightsize but we also want to create a lot of departments),\u201d Lacson said.<\/p>\n

However, he clarified that he is not against any proposal to create a DDR, only that he is concerned that the budgetary requirements for creating a new department might eat up resources meant for social services.<\/p>\n

\u201cAng<\/em>\u00a0concern\u00a0ko sa pag-<\/em>create\u00a0ng<\/em>\u00a0department,\u00a0magkano ang kakailanganin naman sa<\/em>\u00a0national budget\u00a0para tustusan ang bagong<\/em>\u00a0department\u00a0na kayang gawin ng isang<\/em>\u00a0office\u00a0at ginagawa na rin ng<\/em>\u00a0OCD\u00a0kaya lang walang ngipin<\/em>\u00a0(My only concern in creating a department, how much is needed from the national budget to fund the new department whose work could be done by just one office, which is already being done by the OCD although it has no teeth)?\u201d Lacson said.<\/p>\n

\u201cWith 1.4 million government employees and constant salary increases,\u00a0baka mapunta lang sa sweldo ng<\/em>\u00a0(the national budget might just go to the salaries of the) national government.\u00a0Walang maiwan para sa<\/em>\u00a0(Nothing will be left for) development, social services, education, health,\u00a0lahat<\/em>\u00a0(everything else),\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Rather than create a DDR, he suggested the creation of a permanent office to oversee disaster management, with OCD as its nucleus.<\/p>\n

\u201cSila na ang<\/em>\u00a0(They would be the) dedicated office.\u00a0Wala nang<\/em>\u00a0(No more) council. Anyway,\u00a0pag<\/em>\u00a0Cabinet meeting\u00a0naman kinokonsulta ng Pangulo ang iba\u2019t ibang<\/em>\u00a0departments involved\u00a0sa<\/em>\u00a0different phases\u00a0ng<\/em>\u00a0disaster management (during Cabinet meetings, the President always consults the different departments involved in the different phases of disaster management),\u201d Lacson said.\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

MANILA\u00a0— Amid the clamor of several lawmakers for the creation of a Department of Disaster Resilience (DDR) to oversee disaster …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":207434,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-242506","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-ph","mauthors-jose-cielito-reganit","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242506","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=242506"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242506\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":242511,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242506\/revisions\/242511"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/207434"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=242506"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=242506"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=242506"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}