{"id":236870,"date":"2019-11-08T01:34:32","date_gmt":"2019-11-08T06:34:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=236870"},"modified":"2019-11-08T01:34:32","modified_gmt":"2019-11-08T06:34:32","slug":"good-rating-recognition-of-duterte-admins-decisiveness","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/11\/08\/good-rating-recognition-of-duterte-admins-decisiveness\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Good rating\u2019 recognition of Duterte admin\u2019s decisiveness"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_234787\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-234787\" style=\"width: 1350px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/20191017-CDO29.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-234787\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/20191017-CDO29.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1350\" height=\"900\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/20191017-CDO29.jpg 1350w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/20191017-CDO29-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/20191017-CDO29-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/20191017-CDO29-1024x683.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1350px) 100vw, 1350px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-234787\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">FILE: President Rodrigo Roa Duterte in Taguig City on October 16, 2019. ROBINSON NI\u00d1AL JR.\/PRESIDENTIAL PHOTO<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong>MANILA<\/strong>\u00a0&#8212; The Duterte administration\u2019s \u201cvery good\u201d net satisfaction rating reflects how Filipinos can see past the opposition\u2019s \u201cendless politicking\u201d, Malaca\u00f1ang said on Thursday.<\/p>\n<p>In a recent Social Weather Stations (SWS) survey, results showed that 78 percent of adult Filipinos are satisfied with the Duterte administration\u2019s performance where it scored net satisfaction of +67 (very good), which is six points lower than the +73 (excellent) in June 2019.<\/p>\n<p>Presidential Spokesperson Salvador Panelo said despite the decline in the administration\u2019s net satisfaction rating, it showed that people acknowledged President Rodrigo Duterte\u2019s \u201cgenuine empathy, transparency, and decisiveness\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe rating, classified by the independent pollster as very good, demonstrates that a significant number of our countrymen possesses discernment that can stand and see beyond the endless politicking managed by the opposition, as well as the rhetorical aspersions peddled by the President&#8217;s detractors, critics and skeptics,\u201d Panelo said in a statement.<\/p>\n<p>Despite the favorable net satisfaction rating, Panelo said Duterte was not trying to take in any \u201cpopularity contest\u201d but rather do job in accordance to the Constitution.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHe (Duterte) could not care less about these scores because for him, the true measure of proper governance and public service is accomplishing the job entrusted to him by the electorate without expecting any reward for it,\u201d Panelo said.<\/p>\n<p>The SWS survey showed that the Duterte administration\u2019s net satisfaction rating was \u201cvery good\u201d on helping the poor; providing information needed by the citizens to properly examine what the government is doing; and having clear policies, are the highest thereby signifying their acknowledgement of the President\u2019s genuine empathy, transparency and decisiveness.<\/p>\n<p>It was \u201cgood\u201d on fighting terrorism, developing a healthy economy, protecting the freedom of the press, acting according to what the people want, fighting crimes that victimize ordinary citizens, like killings, holdups, robberies, physical violence, etc., reconciliation with Muslim rebels, foreign relations, reconciliation with communist rebels, eradicating graft and corruption in government, recovering ill-gotten wealth of former President Ferdinand Marcos and his cronies and defending Philippine sovereignty in the West Philippine Sea.<\/p>\n<p>It was \u201cmoderate\u201d on ensuring that no family will ever be hungry and have nothing to eat and \u201cneutral\u201d on fighting inflation.<\/p>\n<p>The Duterte administration&#8217;s 6-point decrease was due to a decline of 10 points in Mindanao, 10 points in Balance Luzon, and 1 point in the Visayas, combined with a 12-point increase in Metro Manila.<\/p>\n<p>By class, the administration\u2019s net satisfaction rating fell from excellent to very good in class D, declined from excellent to very good in class E, but rose from very good to excellent in class ABC.<\/p>\n<p>By educational level, net satisfaction with the National Administration fell from excellent to very good among elementary graduates, stayed excellent among high school graduates, stayed very good among non-elementary graduates and college graduates.<\/p>\n<p>The SWS survey was conducted from Sept. 27 to 30 using face-to-face interviews of 1,800 adults nationwide.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA\u00a0&#8212; The Duterte administration\u2019s \u201cvery good\u201d net satisfaction rating reflects how Filipinos can see past the opposition\u2019s \u201cendless politicking\u201d, Malaca\u00f1ang &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":234787,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,16,95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-236870","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","mauthors-azer-parrocha","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236870","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=236870"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236870\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":236871,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236870\/revisions\/236871"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/234787"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=236870"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=236870"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=236870"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}