{"id":236833,"date":"2019-11-07T01:03:48","date_gmt":"2019-11-07T06:03:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=236833"},"modified":"2019-11-07T01:03:48","modified_gmt":"2019-11-07T06:03:48","slug":"sws-duterte-admins-satisfaction-rating-drops-in-q3-of-2019","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/11\/07\/sws-duterte-admins-satisfaction-rating-drops-in-q3-of-2019\/","title":{"rendered":"SWS: Duterte admin’s satisfaction rating drops in Q3 of 2019"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Duterte,<\/a>
FILE: President Rodrigo Roa Duterte presides over the 43rd Cabinet Meeting at the Malaca\u00f1an Palace on November 6, 2019. ALFRED FRIAS\/PRESIDENTIAL PHOTO<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

From “excellent,” the net satisfaction of President Rodrigo Duterte’s administration dropped to “very good” in the third quarter of 2019.<\/p>\n

This, according to the latest survey of the Social Weather Stations (SWS) released on Wednesday, November 6.<\/p>\n

The poll, conducted from September 27 to 30, showed that the current administration scored a net satisfaction of “very good” +67, a six-point decrease from the record high “excellent” +73 in June 2019, and similar to the “very good” +66 recorded in December 2018.<\/p>\n

The SWS found out that 77 percent of Filipinos were\u00a0<\/span>satisfied with the performance of the Duterte administration, while 10 percent were dissatisfied. Eleven percent, meanwhile, were neither satisfied nor dissatisfied.<\/p>\n

The administration’s net satisfaction, it said, declined in all areas, except in Metro Manila where it went up by 12 points.<\/p>\n

It decreased by 10 points in Mindanao and Balance Luzon, respectively, and one point in Visayas.<\/p>\n

Their net satisfaction score also fell from “excellent” to “very good” in both urban and rural areas.<\/p>\n

In terms of socio-economic classes, it declined from “excellent” to “very good” in class D and class E, while it turned vice versa in class ABC.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Report Card<\/b><\/p>\n

Survey respondents also rated the Duterte administration’s performance in 16 specific performance subjects.<\/p>\n

They gave the government a net satisfaction score of “very good” in helping the poor (+62), providing information needed by the citizens to properly examine what the government is doing (+54), and having clear policies (+53).<\/p>\n

It scored “good” on fighting terrorism (+49), developing a healthy economy (+48), protecting the freedom of the press (+47), acting according to what the people want (+44), fighting crimes that victimize ordinary citizens, like killings, holdups, robberies, physical violence, etc. (+43), reconciliation with Muslim rebels (+40), foreign relations (+39), reconciliation with communist rebels (+38), eradicating graft and corruption in government (+32), recovering ill-gotten wealth of former Pres. Marcos and his cronies (+30), and defending Philippine sovereignty in the West Philippine Sea (+30).<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, the administration got a “moderate” net satisfaction score on ensuring that no family will ever be hungry and have nothing to eat (+28), and a “neutral” score on fighting inflation (+5).<\/p>\n

“The satisfaction rating of the general performance of the National Administration is based on a single question, and is not an average of answers to separate questions on specific subjects,” the SWS said.<\/p>\n

In doing this survey, the SWS used face-to-face interviews with 1,800 adults nationwide.<\/p>\n

The survey, which was non-commissioned, has sampling error margins of plus-minus 2.3 percent for national percentages, plus-minus four percent each for Balance Luzon and Mindanao, and plus-minus six percent for Metro Manila and Visayas.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

From “excellent,” the net satisfaction of President Rodrigo Duterte’s administration dropped to “very good” in the third quarter of 2019. …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":236835,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,16,95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-236833","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","mauthors-joanna-belle-deala","mauthors-philippine-canadian-inquirer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236833","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=236833"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236833\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":236836,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236833\/revisions\/236836"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/236835"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=236833"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=236833"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=236833"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}