{"id":235485,"date":"2019-10-22T19:34:03","date_gmt":"2019-10-22T23:34:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=235485"},"modified":"2019-10-22T19:34:03","modified_gmt":"2019-10-22T23:34:03","slug":"liberal-search-for-dance-partners-areas-where-trudeau-might-find-common-ground","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/10\/22\/liberal-search-for-dance-partners-areas-where-trudeau-might-find-common-ground\/","title":{"rendered":"Liberal search for dance partners: areas where Trudeau might find common ground"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
Unlike in Justin Trudeau’s first term, this time the Liberal prime minister will have to strike agreements with political rivals as he tries to win their support to pass legislation and, in some cases, survive confidence votes in the House of Commons. (File Photo<\/a>: @justinpjtrudeau\/Instagram<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

OTTAWA \u2014 The Liberals won more seats Monday than any other party, but came up short in their effort to return to Parliament with another majority mandate.<\/p>\n

Unlike in Justin Trudeau’s first term, this time the Liberal prime minister will have to strike agreements with political rivals as he tries to win their support to pass legislation and, in some cases, survive confidence votes in the House of Commons.<\/p>\n

First, some math. Here are the seat totals for each party following the election.<\/p>\n

\u2014 Liberals: 157 seats, 13 shy of the 170 necessary for a majority in the 338-seat House of Commons.<\/p>\n

\u2014 Conservatives: 121<\/p>\n

\u2014 Bloc Quebecois: 32<\/p>\n

\u2014 New Democrats: 24<\/p>\n

\u2014 Greens: 3<\/p>\n

\u2014 Independent: 1<\/p>\n

The Liberals will have to find common ground with opposition parties to avoid the risk of triggering another election or giving the Conservatives a chance to try to form government. Deals could be part of a formal arrangement with another party \u2014 which Trudeau does not seem to be seeking at this point \u2014 or on a case-by-case basis.<\/p>\n

Here’s a list of policy areas and potential scenarios:<\/p>\n

—<\/p>\n

Liberals and New Democrats<\/p>\n

The New Democrats are the Liberals’ most likely allies. The parties, for instance, might be able to agree on moves in shared areas of interest such as housing and the environment.<\/p>\n

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh has laid out key priorities he said he will fight for when considering whether he’s willing to work with the Liberals.<\/p>\n

They include building a national pharmacare program, investing in affordable housing, waiving interest payments on student loans, slashing cellphone bills, addressing climate change by ending fossil-fuel subsidies and investing in clean, renewable energy and forcing the \u201csuper wealthy\u201d to pay a new tax.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe’re not going to negotiate any of those things today and we’re certainly not going to negotiate those things in the media,\u201d Singh said Tuesday when asked about his parameters for talks with the Liberals.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe’re going to fight within those conditions with everything we have to ensure Canadians know that we’re in it for them.\u201d<\/p>\n

Singh was also asked if he would seek a broader deal with the Liberals or go issue-by-issue. He replied that \u201ceverything’s on the table.\u201d<\/p>\n

There are plenty of potential Liberal-NDP sticking points, however.<\/p>\n

The parties have considerable work to do to narrow the chasm between their positions when it comes to the Liberals’ controversial Trans Mountain pipeline expansion project, the scale of investments towards a national drug plan and electoral reform.<\/p>\n

The NDP committed to spend $10 billion per year towards pharmacare, while the Liberals pledged $6 billion over four years as a down payment.<\/p>\n

Singh was asked Tuesday if he would be willing to soften his opposition to the Trans Mountain project in exchange for more Liberal support towards national pharmacare. He declined to go into detail about any talks, saying only that he will continue to oppose the pipeline expansion.<\/p>\n

On reforming the electoral system, Singh said he intends to push for proportional representation, a system that would have given his party more seats in Monday’s vote. The Liberals broke a 2015 vow to introduce electoral reform, including a pledge to abandon Canada’s first-past-the-post system.<\/p>\n

—<\/p>\n

Liberals and Conservatives<\/p>\n

The Liberals and Conservatives have long been bitter foes in a rivalry that translated into personal attacks during the campaign.<\/p>\n

Newly elected Liberal Steven Guilbeault, a well-known environmentalist who won his Montreal riding, said Monday after the election that he doubted his party could work with the Conservatives.<\/p>\n

There are, however, key areas where Trudeau’s Liberals will likely be able to find agreement with Andrew Scheer’s Conservatives.<\/p>\n

The Trans Mountain pipeline expansion would bring crude oil to an ocean port from Alberta, the Conservatives’ heartland of voter support. The project would help boost the provincial economy and its oil sector. The Tories’ main complaint about the pipeline is that the Liberals haven’t expanded it yet.<\/p>\n

The Liberals and Conservatives could also work together to ratify the updated North American free trade deal among Canada, the United States and Mexico.<\/p>\n

Scheer has criticized Trudeau’s handling of the negotiations towards a modernized NAFTA, insisting the Liberal leader gave up numerous concessions to U.S. President Donald Trump. The Conservatives, however, support free trade and would be unlikely to block any efforts to finalize such an important deal.<\/p>\n

—<\/p>\n

Liberals and Bloc Quebecois<\/p>\n

There’s potential for the Liberals and the pro-independence Bloc Quebecois to agree on issues under the broader themes of the environment and social policy.<\/p>\n

Bloc Quebecois Leader Yves-Francois Blanchet would almost certainly seek more powers for Quebec from the federation in exchange for his support.<\/p>\n

During the campaign, Trudeau was asked if he would be willing to work with the Bloc if he found himself leading a minority Parliament. Trudeau sidestepped the question and underscored his support for national unity and said Quebecers, like many Canadians, were talking to him about the environment.<\/p>\n

On Tuesday, Blanchet told reporters his party will have plenty of leverage in any talks with the Liberals, though he declined to provide specifics. Blanchet said his party would not seek to make Parliament ineffective as a way to build a case for Quebec sovereignty.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe responsibility of the prime minister, and the Liberal party, is to make this Parliament work \u2014 it is their responsibility, not ours, not the responsibility of the NDP or the Conservatives,\u201d Blanchet said, though.<\/p>\n

He added there’s a law stating that government mandates are supposed to last four years. Blanchet said the Liberals should do \u201cwhat it takes\u201d to make Parliament work, out of respect for voters.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

OTTAWA \u2014 The Liberals won more seats Monday than any other party, but came up short in their effort to …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":201289,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-235485","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","mauthors-andy-blatchford","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235485","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=235485"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235485\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":235486,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235485\/revisions\/235486"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/201289"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=235485"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=235485"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=235485"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}