{"id":235188,"date":"2019-10-20T02:05:04","date_gmt":"2019-10-20T06:05:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=235188"},"modified":"2019-10-20T02:05:04","modified_gmt":"2019-10-20T06:05:04","slug":"fate-of-n-b-clinic-speaks-to-unfinished-fight-for-abortion-access-in-region","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/10\/20\/fate-of-n-b-clinic-speaks-to-unfinished-fight-for-abortion-access-in-region\/","title":{"rendered":"Fate of N.B. clinic speaks to unfinished fight for abortion access in region"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
across the country, with rural Canadians at the greatest disadvantage.
Clinic 554 in Fredericton blamed its impending closure on a long-standing provincial refusal to fund surgical abortions performed outside a hospital. (Shutterstock Photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

ST. JOHN’S, N.L. \u2014 The announcement last week that the only private abortion clinic in New Brunswick would close its doors has made abortion a tangible issue in the federal election and highlighted regional barriers Canadians face accessing the procedure.<\/p>\n

More than 30 years after the 1988 Morgentaler Supreme Court decision struck down laws restricting abortion in Canada, advocates say access is still a challenge across the country, with rural Canadians at the greatest disadvantage.<\/p>\n

Clinic 554 in Fredericton blamed its impending closure on a long-standing provincial refusal to fund surgical abortions performed outside a hospital. Critics say the policy is symptomatic of obstacles faced in some parts of Atlantic Canada, where people seeking abortions have been confronted by decades of government resistance, a limited number of clinics, lingering social conservatism and a severe doctor shortage.<\/p>\n

Sarah Kennell, director of government relations with Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights, noted a lack of political will to confront policies like New Brunswick’s. She also highlighted the fact that none of the Atlantic provinces offer abortions after 16 weeks, as opposed to 23 weeks in other parts of the country.<\/p>\n

This limitation forces people to travel to other provinces and sometimes to the United States at their own expense, she said. \u201cThe burden to access what is considered to be a medically necessary service is quite high,\u201d Kennell said.<\/p>\n

New Brunswick is the only province where surgical abortions are only covered if performed in a hospital \u2014 a cause for concern \u201cunder the accessibility and comprehensiveness criteria of the (Canada Health Act),\u201d according to Health Canada’s latest annual report.<\/p>\n

After Fredericton’s Morgentaler clinic closed in 2014, citing lack of provincial funding, the Liberal government of the day removed a regulation requiring women seeking hospital abortions to have two doctors certify the procedure as medically necessary. But the regulation limiting funding to abortions performed in hospitals remained.<\/p>\n

It’s this barrier that has forced Clinic 554’s hand, according to its medical director Dr. Adrian Edgar. He said many of his patients can’t afford the procedure, which costs between $700 and $850, and expenses have become too great to keep the clinic open.<\/p>\n

Edgar said he has presented provincial officials with science-based evidence demonstrating the safety of abortions performed in clinics, and he can’t explain why resistance has been so strong.<\/p>\n

\u201cA lot of very intelligent people have put our heads together and just feel like we’re still knocking them on a wall, because I can’t figure it out,\u201d he said in a phone interview.<\/p>\n

Abortion services are provided at just three hospitals in New Brunswick, Dr. Edgar said, with the closest to Fredericton 150 kilometres away in Moncton.<\/p>\n

He said there is a domino effect within the region when services are reduced in one location. \u201cWhen there’s an access issue in New Brunswick, then our colleagues in P.E.I. or Nova Scotia have to take up the slack,\u201d he said. \u201cWe’re always kind of shuffling the problems around and trying as a greater Maritime community to cope with it.\u201d<\/p>\n

The tight-knit nature of Atlantic communities is one factor driving patients greater distances to avoid a hospital abortion, out of fear of being recognized, according to Dr. Edgar. He said many patients fear the stigma attached to abortion and feel intimidated by a lasting anti-abortion movement in the province.<\/p>\n

Kelly Gordon, an associate professor of political science at McGill University who has studied anti-abortion discourse in Canada, said unlike in the United States, where abortion is openly discussed as a \u201cpolitically salient issue,\u201d Canada’s major political parties have historically avoided the topic.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt’s kind of seen as a hot potato. But that’s been particularly true in terms of party politics in Atlantic Canada,\u201d she said from Montreal. \u201cBoth Liberal and Conservative governments have been sort of very reticent to touch the issue at all.\u201d<\/p>\n

This phenomenon has been especially pronounced in Prince Edward Island, which only began covering abortions in 2016 after a provincial Supreme Court challenge. Anti-abortion advocates had dubbed the province a \u201csanctuary of life\u201d during the nearly 30 years when abortions were not covered, when women seeking the service would be forced to travel to New Brunswick or use unsafe methods to terminate a pregnancy.<\/p>\n

In Newfoundland and Labrador, the province began covering out-of-hospital abortions in the 1990s after Ottawa spent years deducting the costs from the province’s transfer payments. But New Brunswick has remained a holdout.<\/p>\n

Clinic 554 and advocacy groups like Action Canada have called on whatever party takes power after the Oct. 21 federal election to hold New Brunswick accountable under the Canada Health Act by withholding health transfers until the province agrees to fund abortion care outside of hospital settings.<\/p>\n

During a Fredericton campaign stop this week, Liberal leader Justin Trudeau promised he would use \u201call tools at our disposal\u201d to enforce the Canada Health Act. NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh criticized Trudeau for waiting so long, saying he had four year to protect access in New Brunswick.<\/p>\n

Gordon, the political scientist, said it’s a tricky time in Canada for a prime minister to be seen as interfering with provincial policies. \u201cIt’s an interesting question of whether he could effectively do it, or whether there’s will in the province,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n

Premier Higgs seemed to answer the question of political will on Wednesday, defending the province’s policy and accusing Trudeau of making empty threats. \u201cAll the tools that (Trudeau) talks about are the tools he’s had for the last four years, and the decision that was made here in New Brunswick was made four years ago,\u201d the premier said.<\/p>\n

Dr. Edgar said he’s hopeful that federal leaders promising action will keep their word if elected, but after watching decades of hard-fought activism with little movement on the issue, he’ll be satisfied once he sees the regulation repealed.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe’re talking 30 years of asking to just have the same rights as every other Canadian,\u201d he said \u201cYou’re always hopeful that can happen within your lifetime.\u201d<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ST. JOHN’S, N.L. \u2014 The announcement last week that the only private abortion clinic in New Brunswick would close its …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":169210,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-235188","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","mauthors-holly-mckenzie-sutter","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235188","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=235188"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235188\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":235189,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235188\/revisions\/235189"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/169210"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=235188"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=235188"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=235188"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}