{"id":235167,"date":"2019-10-19T23:55:08","date_gmt":"2019-10-20T03:55:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=235167"},"modified":"2019-10-19T23:55:08","modified_gmt":"2019-10-20T03:55:08","slug":"dole-rejects-bill-on-2-year-probation-for-workers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/10\/19\/dole-rejects-bill-on-2-year-probation-for-workers\/","title":{"rendered":"DOLE rejects bill on 2-year probation for workers"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_209382\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-209382\" style=\"width: 1500px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/ph7-033117_CADO6.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-209382\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/ph7-033117_CADO6.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1500\" height=\"1000\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/ph7-033117_CADO6.jpg 1500w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/ph7-033117_CADO6-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/ph7-033117_CADO6-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/ph7-033117_CADO6-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/ph7-033117_CADO6-20x13.jpg 20w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1500px) 100vw, 1500px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-209382\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">\u201cDelaying a worker\u2019s assurance of permanent employment is no longer in keeping with the administration\u2019s policy on security of tenure,\u201d he added.(PCOO File Photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong>MANILA<\/strong>\u00a0&#8212; The Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) has opposed the bill filed by Probinsyano Ako Party-list Rep. Jose Singson Jr. seeking to extend the employment probation period from six months to two years.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI don\u2019t think it is necessary for a worker to undergo a probationary period of two years for an employer to determine his qualification. Six months is enough,\u201d Labor Secretary Silvestre Bello III said in a statement on Saturday.<\/p>\n<p>Extending the probation period violates workers\u2019 right to security of tenure, Bello said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDelaying a worker\u2019s assurance of permanent employment is no longer in keeping with the administration\u2019s policy on security of tenure,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n<p>Bello also said that the proposal might encourage illegal contractualization practices.<\/p>\n<p>Among them is the practice of \u201cendo\u201d, as employers can terminate the workers within two years, which would limit a worker\u2019s right to statutory benefits as a regular employee.<\/p>\n<p>Under the law, workers are given a six-month probation period and shall be considered a regular employee after the lapse of the period.<\/p>\n<p>Singson, in his proposal, said a six-month probation period is not enough to determine a worker\u2019s qualification for regular employment.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA\u00a0&#8212; The Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) has opposed the bill filed by Probinsyano Ako Party-list Rep. Jose Singson &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":209382,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-235167","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-ph","mauthors-ferdinand-patinio","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235167","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=235167"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235167\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":235169,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235167\/revisions\/235169"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/209382"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=235167"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=235167"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=235167"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}