{"id":234589,"date":"2019-10-14T20:01:37","date_gmt":"2019-10-15T00:01:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=234589"},"modified":"2019-10-14T20:02:21","modified_gmt":"2019-10-15T00:02:21","slug":"ex-national-security-council-official-testifying-to-congress","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/10\/14\/ex-national-security-council-official-testifying-to-congress\/","title":{"rendered":"Ex-National Security Council official testifying to Congress"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
Hill wouldn’t comment as she arrived on Capitol Hill, but the hearing was stretching beyond 10 hours in the closed session. (File Photo By Kuhlmann \/MSC – https:\/\/www.securityconference.de\/mediathek\/munich-security-conference-2017\/image\/fiona-hill\/filter\/image\/, CC BY 3.0 de<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

WASHINGTON \u2014 Fiona Hill, a former top National Security Council expert on Russia, was testifying to Congress behind closed doors Monday, the latest former\u00a0Trump\u00a0administration official to be subpoenaed as part of the House\u00a0impeachment\u00a0inquiry into President Donald\u00a0Trump.<\/p>\n

Hill wouldn’t comment as she arrived on Capitol Hill, but the hearing was stretching beyond 10 hours in the closed session. Her attorney said she had received a congressional subpoena and would \u201ccomply and answer questions\u201d from lawmakers. She resigned from the White House National Security Council over the summer.<\/p>\n

She is the first White House official to appear as part of the House\u00a0impeachment\u00a0inquiry . Her appearance comes despite a White House vow to halt any and all co-operation with what it termed the \u201cillegitimate\u201d\u00a0impeachment\u00a0probe. The White House did not immediately respond to questions about whether they had sought to limit Hill’s testimony.<\/p>\n

A former top aide to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has also been asked to appear for an interview this week, according to several officials familiar with the planning.<\/p>\n

Michael McKinley, a career foreign service officer and Pompeo’s de facto chief of staff, resigned Friday, ending a 37-year career, as the\u00a0impeachment\u00a0probe turns its focus on the State Department in the Ukraine matter.<\/p>\n

The sources were unauthorized to discuss the planning and granted anonymity.<\/p>\n

House Democrats asked that McKinley appear for a closed-door interview Wednesday, the day after George Kent, another State Department official, is scheduled. It is unclear if they will appear.<\/p>\n

Republicans called on Rep. Adam Schiff, the chairman of the House intelligence committee, to release transcripts of the depositions to the public. The California Democrat said Sunday that having witnesses appear behind closed doors would prevent them from knowing what other witnesses said.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe want to make sure that we meet the needs of the investigation and not give the president or his legal minions the opportunity to tailor their testimony and in some cases fabricate testimony to suit their interests,\u201d Schiff said on CBS’ \u201cFace the Nation.\u201d<\/p>\n

Rep. Jim Jordan, the top Republican on the House oversight committee, said he learned Monday morning that Schiff had subpoenaed Hill.<\/p>\n

\u201cShe was going to come, she’d agreed to come, she was going to come voluntarily but he’s going to subpoena her, I believe, so he could ask certain questions and again keep those secret except for the certain things he wants to leak,\u201d Jordan said. \u201cThe tragedy here and the crime here is that the American people don’t get to see what’s going on in these sessions.\u201d<\/p>\n

The subpoena was issued because of attempts by the\u00a0Trump\u00a0administration to direct witnesses not to co-operate with the\u00a0impeachment\u00a0inquiry and to limit the testimony of witnesses, an official working on the\u00a0impeachment\u00a0inquiry told The Associated Press. Hill complied with the subpoena and was answering questions from both Democrats and Republicans, the official said.<\/p>\n

The official spoke on condition of anonymity in order to discuss details of the closed-door deposition.<\/p>\n

Later this week, U.S. ambassador Gordon Sondland,\u00a0Trump’s hand-picked ambassador to the European Union, is expected to appear for a deposition against the wishes of the White House, after being subpoenaed. He’s expected to tell Congress that his text message reassuring another envoy that there was no quid pro quo in their interactions with Ukraine was based solely on what\u00a0Trump\u00a0told him, according to a person familiar with his coming testimony in the\u00a0impeachment\u00a0probe<\/p>\n

Sondland’s appearance, set for Thursday, comes after a cache of text messages from top envoys provided a vivid account of their work acting as intermediaries around the time\u00a0Trump\u00a0urged Ukraine’s new president, Volodymr Zelenskiy, to start investigations into a company linked to the family of Democratic rival Joe Biden.<\/p>\n

One witness who may not be called before Congress is the still-anonymous government whistleblower who touched off the\u00a0impeachment\u00a0inquiry.<\/p>\n

Top Democrats say testimony and evidence coming in from other witnesses, and even the Republican president himself, are backing up the whistleblower’s account of what transpired during\u00a0Trump’s July 25 phone call with Zelenskiy. Lawmakers have grown deeply concerned about protecting the person from\u00a0Trump’s threats and may not wish to risk exposing the whistleblower’s identity.<\/p>\n

Schiff said on Sunday that Democrats \u201cdon’t need the whistleblower, who wasn’t on the call, to tell us what took place on the call.\u201d<\/p>\n

Schiff said it \u201cmay not be necessary\u201d to reveal the whistleblower’s identity as the House gathers evidence. \u201cOur primary interest right now is making sure that that person is protected,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

But\u00a0Trump\u00a0strongly objected.<\/p>\n

\u201cAdam Schiff now doesn’t seem to want the Whistleblower to testify. NO!\u201d the Republican president tweeted early Monday. \u201cWe must determine the Whistleblower’s identity to determine WHY this was done to the USA.\u201d<\/p>\n

The\u00a0impeachment\u00a0inquiry is testing the Constitution’s system of checks and balances as the House presses forward with the probe and the White House dismisses it as \u201cillegitimate\u201d because there has been no formal vote of the House to open\u00a0impeachment\u00a0proceedings.<\/p>\n

In calling for a vote, the White House is trying to press House Democrats who may be politically reluctant to put their names formally behind\u00a0impeachment.<\/p>\n

But House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has resisted those efforts and is unlikely to budge as Congress returns this week. Democrats say Congress is well within its power as the legislative branch to conduct oversight of the president and it is Republicans, having grown weary of\u00a0Trump’s actions, who may be in the greater political bind over a vote.<\/p>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014<\/p>\n

Associated Press writers Eric Tucker and Lisa Mascaro contributed to this report.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

WASHINGTON \u2014 Fiona Hill, a former top National Security Council expert on Russia, was testifying to Congress behind closed doors …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":234591,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-234589","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","mauthors-michael-balsamo","mauthors-mary-clare-jalonick","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234589","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=234589"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234589\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":234593,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234589\/revisions\/234593"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/234591"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=234589"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=234589"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=234589"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}