{"id":234142,"date":"2019-10-11T00:22:12","date_gmt":"2019-10-11T04:22:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=234142"},"modified":"2019-10-11T00:22:12","modified_gmt":"2019-10-11T04:22:12","slug":"british-columbia-premier-defends-chief-of-staff-over-handling-of-allegations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/10\/11\/british-columbia-premier-defends-chief-of-staff-over-handling-of-allegations\/","title":{"rendered":"British Columbia premier defends chief of staff over handling of allegations"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
Horgan says Geoff Meggs shredded the document after a copy of it had been given to the police. (File Photo:<\/a> John Horgan\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

VICTORIA — Premier John Horgan defended how his chief of staff handled allegations made against the former clerk of the B.C. legislature when he first learned of them in July 2018 as the Liberals questioned a decision to shred a document outlining the accusations.<\/p>\n

Horgan says Geoff Meggs shredded the document after a copy of it had been given to the police.<\/p>\n

A report released Tuesday on the conduct of former sergeant-at-arms Gary Lenz by a former Vancouver deputy police chief shows the premier’s office was approached about allegations made against Lenz and former clerk Craig James.<\/p>\n

It says a meeting that included Speaker Darryl Plecas and his deputy, Raj Chouhan, was held July 30, 2018, when a report of between 40 and 50 pages \u201cwith a long list of allegations\u201d was produced.<\/p>\n

Horgan says the men wanted Meggs to make the premier aware of the allegations but were told they should take the accusations to the police.<\/p>\n

Once Meggs knew the document was in the hands of the police, Horgan said he shredded it.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt was no longer a document that was worth keeping,\u201d Horgan told reporters Wednesday. \u201cIt wasn’t created by our office. It was not a public document that was part of the running the government of British Columbia. It was in the hands of the police. There was no need for us to keep it.\u201d<\/p>\n

Lenz and James have both retired since allegations about their spending first came to light in November 2018. Both men have denied any wrongdoing.<\/p>\n

In a letter to Horgan on Wednesday, B.C. Liberal Leader Andrew Wilkinson says Meggs should have brought what he was told to the attention of the police and the house leaders of the three parties in the legislature.<\/p>\n

\u201cMr. Meggs has admitted to shredding the evidence presented to him. This is indefensible, as it is his obligation to bring possible criminal activity to the attention of the police,\u201d Wilkinson said.<\/p>\n

\u201cMr. Meggs’ conduct is an inexcusable obstruction of the judicial process. We are calling for you as premier to put your friendship aside, do what is right for the people of British Columbia, and immediately terminate your chief of staff, Geoff Meggs.\u201d<\/p>\n

Meggs said Plecas brought \u201cmultiple copies of a draft report\u201d containing allegations against the clerk to the meeting.<\/p>\n

\u201cI was in no position to verify the allegations,\u201d he said in a statement, adding that he urged the Speaker to go to the police and was later advised by Chouhan that he had done so.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe document I reviewed was not evidence, but a copy of a summary of internal investigations conducted by the Speaker’s office. There was no supporting documentation or back-up material.\u201d<\/p>\n

Horgan said Meggs acted appropriately in his handling of the allegations and the document.<\/p>\n

\u201cGeoff didn’t create the document,\u201d he added. \u201cHe didn’t know its accuracy. He didn’t know its origins. It wasn’t his responsibility.\u201d<\/p>\n

Horgan said he wasn’t briefed on the document at the time and didn’t know about the allegations against Lenz and James until after a special prosecutor was appointed.<\/p>\n

He said the deputy Speaker informed him of allegations of wrongdoing against James in the summer of 2018, but he declined a request for a meeting with Plecas because the operations of the legislature are the responsibility of the legislative assembly management committee.<\/p>\n

Horgan said he also didn’t want to be involved because he had voted against the appointment of James when he was an opposition member of the legislature.<\/p>\n

\u201cMore to the point though, and I think this is critically important, it’s not secret to those of you who covered this place for a long time I voted against the appointment of Craig James for a myriad of reasons, some of them were public, some of them were private,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

\u201cI felt that if there were allegations of wrongdoing, if I was involved, there could be a perception of bias.\u201d<\/p>\n

Horgan said he asked Meggs to take the meeting instead and a document was left behind, which was later shredded.<\/p>\n

\u201cGeoff shredded the document,\u201d he said. \u201cIt was his to shred.\u201d<\/p>\n

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 9, 2019.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

VICTORIA — Premier John Horgan defended how his chief of staff handled allegations made against the former clerk of the …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":156581,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-234142","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","mauthors-dirk-meissner","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234142","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=234142"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234142\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":234143,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234142\/revisions\/234143"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/156581"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=234142"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=234142"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=234142"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}