{"id":234017,"date":"2019-10-09T00:05:36","date_gmt":"2019-10-09T04:05:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=234017"},"modified":"2019-10-09T00:05:36","modified_gmt":"2019-10-09T04:05:36","slug":"legos-lying-around-toy-maker-tests-way-to-recycle-bricks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/10\/09\/legos-lying-around-toy-maker-tests-way-to-recycle-bricks\/","title":{"rendered":"Legos lying around? Toy maker tests way to recycle bricks"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_234018\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-234018\" style=\"width: 1920px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/lego-blocks-2458575_1920.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-234018\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/lego-blocks-2458575_1920.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1920\" height=\"1280\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/lego-blocks-2458575_1920.jpg 1920w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/lego-blocks-2458575_1920-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/lego-blocks-2458575_1920-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/lego-blocks-2458575_1920-1024x683.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1920px) 100vw, 1920px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-234018\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Lego, like other big brands, is looking to please customers worried about plastic&#8217;s impact on the environment. Plastic doesn&#8217;t disintegrate but instead can break down into tiny pieces and be eaten by birds or other wildlife, endangering their health. (Pixabay Photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>NEW YORK \u2014 Lego is looking to keep its plastic bricks out of the trash.<\/p>\n<p>The Danish toymaker is testing a way for customers to ship their unwanted bricks back and get them into the hands of other kids.<\/p>\n<p>It said Tuesday that customers in the U.S. can print out a mailing label on its site, dump their used Lego bricks in a box and ship them off for free. Lego said the pieces will be cleaned, put in a box and given to Teach for America, a non-profit that will donate them to classrooms across the United States. Some bricks will be also sent to the Boys &amp; Girls Clubs of Boston for their after-school programs.<\/p>\n<p>Lego said if the test is successful, it may expand the program beyond the U.S. next year.<\/p>\n<p>The company typically tells its customers to keep their bricks or pass them on to others. But some have asked for another way to donate them, said Tim Brooks, Lego&#8217;s vice-president of environmental responsibility.<\/p>\n<p>Lego, like other big brands, is looking to please customers worried about plastic&#8217;s impact on the environment. Plastic doesn&#8217;t disintegrate but instead can break down into tiny pieces and be eaten by birds or other wildlife, endangering their health.<\/p>\n<p>It is also working to find other materials for its colorful bricks. But finding one as durable as plastic has been a challenge, Brooks said. Last year, however, it began making Lego trees and bushes out of sugar cane.<\/p>\n<p>Rival Hasbro, which makes Monopoly and Mr. Potato Head, said it plans to eliminate plastic use in its packaging by 2022. It too has said that finding a material to replace the plastic in its toys has been tricky.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NEW YORK \u2014 Lego is looking to keep its plastic bricks out of the trash. The Danish toymaker is testing &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":234018,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-234017","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-lifestyle","mauthors-joseph-pisani","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234017","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=234017"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234017\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":234019,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234017\/revisions\/234019"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/234018"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=234017"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=234017"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=234017"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}