{"id":232933,"date":"2019-09-29T22:42:02","date_gmt":"2019-09-30T02:42:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=232933"},"modified":"2019-09-29T22:42:02","modified_gmt":"2019-09-30T02:42:02","slug":"us-senator-leahy-ignorant-on-de-limas-detention-palace","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/09\/29\/us-senator-leahy-ignorant-on-de-limas-detention-palace\/","title":{"rendered":"US Senator Leahy \u2018ignorant\u2019 on de Lima\u2019s detention: Palace"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
FILE: Presidential Spokesperson and Chief Presidential Legal Counsel Secretary Salvador Panelo on November 26, 2018, at the New Executive Building (NEB) in Malaca\u00f1ang. (Photo<\/a>: Office of the Presidential Spokesperson\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

MANILA<\/strong>\u00a0— Malaca\u00f1ang called US Senator Patrick Leahy \u201cignorant\u201d for assuming he saw the entire picture surrounding Senator Leila de Lima\u2019s incarceration.<\/p>\n

This, after Leahy co-sponsored an amendment to the proposal to bar the entry to the US of any Philippine official involved in de Lima’s imprisonment, which was later approved by a US Senate committee.<\/p>\n

Presidential Spokesperson Salvador Panelo, however, slammed Leahy for the amendment which insisted that de Lima was \u201cwrongfully imprisoned\u201d.<\/p>\n

Panelo said Leahy does not have \u201csufficient knowledge\u201d about Philippine laws and has not \u201cpersonally examined\u201d de Lima\u2019s case since he has not even set foot in the country.<\/p>\n

He emphasized that the US Senator does not have \u201can iota of proof\u201d and was only speaking \u201cnot only of blissful ignorance but unscented abuse\u201d.<\/p>\n

\u201cSenator Leahy\u2019s statement assumes he has sufficient knowledge of our substantive and procedural laws that constitute our country\u2019s justice system. It further assumes that he personally examined the record folder of the case and after evaluating it concluded that there was an abuse in the judicial process De Lima underwent,\u201d Panelo said in a statement on Sunday.<\/p>\n

\u201cBoth assumptions do not exist as the good US Senator is ignorant of our procedural rules subjecting a person charged with the commission of a crime. Neither has he set foot in the country for the sole purpose of personally examining the case of De Lima that he may have a reasonable basis to buttress his proposal,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n

In speaking of abuse, Panelo said Leahy could have been referring to his own abuse of his freedom of expression by making a \u201cbaseless conclusion.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cHe waxes a false and malicious narrative against our government officials with unparalleled arrogance and without a glint of remorse,\u201d Panelo said.<\/p>\n

\u201cThat such totally baseless conclusion comes from a Senator of the United States of America, a country that prides itself as a bulwark of democracy and observer of due process,\u00a0 is bad enough and a continuing disappointment. If Senator Leahy is a lawyer then that makes it worse and unpardonable,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n

What abuse of power?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Panelo explained that there was no abuse of power because de Lima was accorded the constitutional requirement of due process.<\/p>\n

\u201cFor the enlightenment of Senator Leahy, there would been abuse in the case of Senator De Lima if she was formally charged without the existence of a probable cause and if she was arrested without a warrant of arrest or if a warrant of arrest was issued by a judge without a finding of probable or if during the preliminary investigation she was not afforded the opportunity to submit countervailing evidence in her behalf,\u201d Panelo said.<\/p>\n

He dismissed de Lima and her supporters\u2019 cry of political persecution as \u201cthe convenient refuge of political chameleons who change their beliefs at will to suit their political agenda.\u201d<\/p>\n

While Leahy defended de Lima\u2019s wrongful imprisonment, Panelo rebutted by saying he was defending official actions of the government.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhat I am defending is the independence of the official actions of the institutions of this Republic. What I am defending is the sovereignty of this nation from outside interference,\u201d Panelo said.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhat I am defending is the country’s presidency which commands the occupant to serve and protect the people from the enemies of the state that are bent on destroying the nation and the republic,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n

The Palace official also reminded Leahy that the Philippines is an independent country.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe remind Senator Leahy that the Republic of the Philippines is not a vassal nor a colony of America. It is an independent state that is fiercely protective of its sovereignty and subservient to no other country,\u201d Panelo said.<\/p>\n

De Lima, one of the staunchest critics of President Rodrigo Duterte, has been in detention since February 2017 for her alleged involvement in the illegal drug trade. However, she has denied these charges.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

MANILA\u00a0— Malaca\u00f1ang called US Senator Patrick Leahy \u201cignorant\u201d for assuming he saw the entire picture surrounding Senator Leila de Lima\u2019s …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":191167,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,16,95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-232933","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","mauthors-azer-parrocha","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232933","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=232933"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232933\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":232944,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232933\/revisions\/232944"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/191167"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=232933"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=232933"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=232933"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}