{"id":230862,"date":"2019-09-14T00:49:26","date_gmt":"2019-09-14T04:49:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=230862"},"modified":"2019-09-14T00:49:26","modified_gmt":"2019-09-14T04:49:26","slug":"alberta-ending-separate-offices-for-climate-change-environmental-monitoring","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/09\/14\/alberta-ending-separate-offices-for-climate-change-environmental-monitoring\/","title":{"rendered":"Alberta ending separate offices for climate change, environmental monitoring"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
FILE: Alberta Legislature Building (Photo By Timorose – Own work\/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

EDMONTON \u2014 Alberta’s United Conservative government plans to eliminate its stand-alone offices for climate change policy and environmental monitoring, a move some say will damage the province’s standing and its ability to make science-based plans.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhat’s going to suffer is Alberta’s international reputation (and) our overall approach to science and evidence-based decision making,\u201d said New Democrat legislature member Shannon Phillips, who was environment minister in the previous government.<\/p>\n

The intention is outlined in a Sept. 10 email from Alberta Environment and Parks deputy minister Bev Yee, obtained by The Canadian Press.<\/p>\n

Yee outlines a departmental re-organization under which the climate change office created during Phillips’ tenure will disappear. So will the environmental monitoring and science division, initially created as an arm’s-length agency in 2014 by the provincial Conservative government and brought back into government by the New Democrats.<\/p>\n

Both will be \u201cintegrated into the new structure,\u201d says Yee’s email.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe primary drivers and intended outcomes of this reorganization include enhanced business integration, the achievement of efficiencies, and providing better support to achieve government priorities,\u201d wrote Yee.<\/p>\n

The changes are to be effective Oct. 15.<\/p>\n

Yee said in an emailed statement Friday that the process is about increasing effectiveness.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis reorganization will bring many of the department’s brightest scientific minds under one division and eliminate some of the administrative overlap that can prevent them from doing their best work.\u201d<\/p>\n

In an email, department spokeswoman Jess Sinclair said the climate change office has been incorporated into Alberta Environment’s general policy effort \u201cin order to ensure that (department) policy is developed with an eye to the overall management of pollution in the province.\u201d<\/p>\n

But Phillips said the moves downgrade both climate and monitoring policy.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe no longer have a government that is interested in putting forward credible climate change policy or credible monitoring and science in the oilsands,\u201d she said. \u201cI have serious questions about the resourcing of environmental monitoring in the oilsands.\u201d<\/p>\n

Phillips suggested the change is a prelude to cuts.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt’s easier to hide the cuts if they’re absorbed within the department.\u201d<\/p>\n

Environmental groups called the changes part of a pattern in Jason Kenney’s United Conservative government to roll back climate and environmental policies.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf this government didn’t have a very clear agenda to stall climate action and harass environmental organizations, then I might be willing to consider this normal operations for a new government,\u201d said Catherine Abreu of Climate Action Network Canada.<\/p>\n

\u201c(But) I can’t help but see the elimination of their climate department as part of their overall strategy.\u201d<\/p>\n

Since taking office in April, the Kenney government has eliminated Alberta’s carbon tax, cancelled programs encouraging renewable energy, launched a $30-million \u201cwar room\u201d to fight what it calls misinformation and started a $2.5-million inquiry into an alleged conspiracy to landlock Alberta oil.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe continue to try to work with the government of Alberta,\u201d said Duncan Kenyon of the Pembina Institute, an Alberta-based clean energy think-tank. \u201cBut since taking office, every decision they have made on climate change will result in increased pollution.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThis is what climate denial looks like when it’s in power,\u201d said Keith Stewart of Greenpeace in an email. \u201cDisappearing the division won’t make the climate crisis go away.\u201d<\/p>\n

Sinclair said the moves are not an attempt to do less on environmental issues.<\/p>\n

\u201cEmissions management is a priority for this government,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

EDMONTON \u2014 Alberta’s United Conservative government plans to eliminate its stand-alone offices for climate change policy and environmental monitoring, a …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":229350,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-230862","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","mauthors-bob-weber","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230862","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=230862"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230862\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":230863,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230862\/revisions\/230863"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/229350"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=230862"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=230862"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=230862"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}