{"id":230565,"date":"2019-09-11T21:11:42","date_gmt":"2019-09-12T01:11:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=230565"},"modified":"2019-09-11T21:11:42","modified_gmt":"2019-09-12T01:11:42","slug":"china-to-agree-on-60-40-if-arbitral-ruling-is-set-aside-prrd","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/09\/11\/china-to-agree-on-60-40-if-arbitral-ruling-is-set-aside-prrd\/","title":{"rendered":"China to agree on 60-40 if arbitral ruling is set aside: PRRD"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
FILE: President Rodrigo Roa Duterte receives a warm welcome from People’s Republic of China President Xi Jinping prior to the start of the Leaders’ Roundtable Discussion of the 2nd Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation at the Yanqi Lake International Convention Center on April 27, 2019. SIMEON CELI JR.\/PRESIDENTIAL PHOTO<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

MANILA<\/strong>\u00a0— The Chinese government will agree on a 60-40 sharing scheme in favor of the Philippines only if Manila will set aside the landmark Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) ruling on the South China Sea, President Rodrigo Duterte said on Tuesday.<\/p>\n

“Set aside your claim. Then allow everybody connected with the Chinese companies,\u201d Duterte said, relaying to the media his conversation with Chinese President Xi Jinping during the Filipino leader\u2019s fifth visit to Beijing on Aug. 29, 2019.<\/p>\n

\u201cThey want to explore and if there is something\u00a0sabi nila<\/em>\u00a0(they said), ‘We would be gracious enough to give you 60 percent.’ Forty\u00a0lang ang kanila<\/em>\u00a0(Only 40 percent for them). That is the promise of Xi Jinping,” Duterte said, recalling his exchanges with the Chinese leader, during a press conference in Malaca\u00f1ang.<\/p>\n

Duterte said he raised the 2016 PCA verdict, which invalidates China\u2019s nine-dash line that claims almost 80 percent of the strategic water, but Beijing maintained its position.<\/p>\n

“Sabi ng<\/em>\u00a0China (said), ‘That is ours,'” he said. “Meaning to say the only way to retake is to declare war. Go there and sink all their ships.”<\/p>\n

\u201cYou know, China is there. He holds the property under the claim of ownership.\u00a0‘Yan ang sagot niya<\/em>\u00a0(That was his answer). It is ours, we will not budge,\u201d he added, referring to Xi\u2019s reply when Duterte raised The Hague ruling.<\/p>\n

When asked if the proposed 60-40 exploration of oil and gas resources will cover the exclusive economic zone (EEZ), Duterte said the country\u2019s 200-nautical mile EEZ \u201cis part of the arbitral ruling which we will ignore to come up with an economic activity.\u201d<\/p>\n

In the same media briefing, Duterte scored former Foreign Affairs chief Albert del Rosario for China’s eventual possession of the Scarborough Shoal when the Philippines withdrew during a standoff in 2012.<\/p>\n

“If we are ready to do that,\u00a0okay lang<\/em>. But\u00a0kung mag-<\/em>attack\u00a0tayo<\/em>\u00a0(it\u2019s okay, But if we will attack), I want del Rosario and (Senior Associate Justice Antonio) Carpio leading the way,” he said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

MANILA\u00a0— The Chinese government will agree on a 60-40 sharing scheme in favor of the Philippines only if Manila will …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":211959,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1145,16,95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-230565","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headline","category-news","category-news-ph","mauthors-joyce-ann-l-rocamora","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230565","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=230565"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230565\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":230566,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230565\/revisions\/230566"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/211959"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=230565"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=230565"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=230565"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}