{"id":229796,"date":"2019-09-07T03:39:37","date_gmt":"2019-09-07T07:39:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=229796"},"modified":"2019-09-07T03:39:37","modified_gmt":"2019-09-07T07:39:37","slug":"uk-opposition-parties-reject-boris-johnsons-election-call","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/09\/07\/uk-opposition-parties-reject-boris-johnsons-election-call\/","title":{"rendered":"UK opposition parties reject Boris Johnson&#8217;s election call"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_227466\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-227466\" style=\"width: 960px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/67686708_10156613664371317_3740796217077006336_n.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-227466\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/67686708_10156613664371317_3740796217077006336_n.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"960\" height=\"640\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/67686708_10156613664371317_3740796217077006336_n.jpg 960w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/67686708_10156613664371317_3740796217077006336_n-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/67686708_10156613664371317_3740796217077006336_n-768x512.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-227466\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Johnson already lost a vote on the same question this week, but plans to try again Monday, saying an election is the only way to break the country&#8217;s deadlock over Brexit. (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/borisjohnson\/photos\/a.10153687903061317\/10156613664361317\/?type=3&amp;amp;theater\">File Photo<\/a>: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/borisjohnson\/\">Boris Johnson\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>LONDON \u2014 Britain&#8217;s opposition parties said Friday that they won&#8217;t support Prime Minister Boris Johnson&#8217;s call for an election when the issue gets voted on next week, piling more pressure on Britain&#8217;s embattled leader as he seeks a way to make good on his promise to leave the European Union next month.<\/p>\n<p>The parties have been mulling whether to agree to Johnson&#8217;s plan for an Oct. 15 election, which can only be triggered if two-thirds of lawmakers agree.<\/p>\n<p>Johnson already lost a vote on the same question this week, but plans to try again Monday, saying an election is the only way to break the country&#8217;s deadlock over Brexit.<\/p>\n<p>Opponents don&#8217;t want to agree to a vote unless they can ensure Johnson can&#8217;t take Britain out of the EU as scheduled on Oct. 31 without a divorce agreement in place, as he has threatened to do so.<\/p>\n<p>After discussions Friday, opposition lawmakers said they would not back an election until the government asked the EU to delay Brexit. Johnson says he would \u201crather be dead in a ditch\u201d than do that.<\/p>\n<p>The parties said they would either vote against Johnson&#8217;s motion or abstain on Monday.<\/p>\n<p>Parliament is in the midst of passing an opposition-backed law that would compel the Conservative government to seek a three-month Brexit postponement if no divorce deal is agreed by late October. The bill is likely to become law by Monday, and many pro-EU lawmakers want to hold off on triggering an election until it is set in stone, fearing Johnson will try to wriggle out of the commitment.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI do not trust the prime minister to do his duty,\u201d said Liz Saville Roberts, leader in Parliament of the Welsh party Plaid Cymru.<\/p>\n<p>She said lawmakers needed to be sitting in Parliament in late October, rather than on the campaign trail, to ensure Britain does not crash out of the EU. That makes an election before November unlikely.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe need to make sure that we get past the 31st of October,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s a risky strategy for the opposition, which could be accused of denying the public its say.<\/p>\n<p>Ian Blackford, leader in Parliament of the Scottish National Party, said he was \u201cdesperate for an election,\u201d but only after Britain had secured a delay to Brexit.<\/p>\n<p>Johnson said he had \u201cnever known an opposition in the history of democracy that&#8217;s refused to have an election.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think obviously they don&#8217;t trust the people, they don&#8217;t think that the people will vote for them, so they&#8217;re refusing to have an election,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s unclear what options Johnson has if he loses Monday&#8217;s vote. He could call a no-confidence vote in his own government, which would only need a simply a majority to pass. He could try to change the law that governs how elections can be triggered. He could even resign.<\/p>\n<p>In short, it&#8217;s a mess.<\/p>\n<p>Johnson became prime minister in July after promising Conservatives that he would complete Brexit and break the impasse that has paralyzed Britain&#8217;s politics since voters decided in June 2016 to leave the bloc and which brought down his predecessor, Theresa May.<\/p>\n<p>After only six weeks in office, however, his plans are in crisis. The EU refuses to renegotiate the deal it struck with May, which has been rejected three times by Britain&#8217;s Parliament.<\/p>\n<p>Johnson&#8217;s push to leave the EU by Halloween come what may is facing stiff opposition, both in Parliament and in the courts. Most economists say a no-deal Brexit would cause severe economic disruption and plunge the U.K. into recession.<\/p>\n<p>On Friday, Britain&#8217;s High Court rejected a claim that Johnson is acting unlawfully in suspending Parliament for several weeks ahead of the country&#8217;s scheduled departure from the EU.<\/p>\n<p>Johnson enraged his opponents by announcing he would send lawmakers home at some point next week until Oct. 14, just over two weeks before Britain is due to leave the EU. Critics accused him of subverting democracy and carrying out a \u201ccoup.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Transparency campaigner Gina Miller took the government to court, arguing the suspension was an \u201cunlawful abuse of power.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>A panel of three High Court judges ruled against her, but said the case can be appealed to the Supreme Court, which has set a hearing for Sept. 17.<\/p>\n<p>Outside court, Miller said she was disappointed with the ruling but \u201cpleased that the judges have given us permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTo give up now would be a dereliction of our responsibility,\u201d she said. \u201cWe need to protect our institutions. It is not right that they should be shut down or bullied, especially at this momentous time in our history.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>With the date set for Brexit just 55 days away, EU officials say it seems increasingly likely Britain will depart without an agreement.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe situation in Britain is quite a mess now and we don&#8217;t know what is happening there,\u201d said Finnish Prime Minister Antti Rinne, whose country currently holds the EU&#8217;s rotating presidency.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt seems very obvious that we are not getting Brexit with an agreement,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>\u2014\u2014\u2014<\/p>\n<p>Lorne Cook in Brussels contributed to this story.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>LONDON \u2014 Britain&#8217;s opposition parties said Friday that they won&#8217;t support Prime Minister Boris Johnson&#8217;s call for an election when &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":227466,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-229796","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","mauthors-jill-lawless","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/229796","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=229796"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/229796\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":229797,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/229796\/revisions\/229797"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/227466"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=229796"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=229796"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=229796"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}