{"id":228601,"date":"2019-08-29T01:26:44","date_gmt":"2019-08-29T05:26:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=228601"},"modified":"2019-08-29T01:26:44","modified_gmt":"2019-08-29T05:26:44","slug":"women-with-phds-reach-pay-equity-with-men-but-big-gaps-remain-for-other-grads","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/08\/29\/women-with-phds-reach-pay-equity-with-men-but-big-gaps-remain-for-other-grads\/","title":{"rendered":"Women with PhDs reach pay equity with men, but big gaps remain for other grads"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_228609\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-228609\" style=\"width: 1498px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/photo-1459499362902-55a20553e082.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-228609\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/photo-1459499362902-55a20553e082.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1498\" height=\"1001\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/photo-1459499362902-55a20553e082.jpg 1498w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/photo-1459499362902-55a20553e082-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/photo-1459499362902-55a20553e082-768x513.jpg 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/photo-1459499362902-55a20553e082-1024x684.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1498px) 100vw, 1498px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-228609\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The research found that both male and female doctoral graduates earn about $70,000 annually during the first three years after convocation. (Photo: Tim Gouw\/Unsplash)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The wage gap has closed between women and men with newly earned PhDs &#8212; though the numbers are less comforting for those without a decade to spend in the halls of higher learning, according to a University of Guelph study announced Tuesday.<\/p>\n<p>The research found that both male and female doctoral graduates earn about $70,000 annually during the first three years after convocation.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis is the first time that I&#8217;ve seen at any level that there is no discrepancy in earnings between males and females,\u201d said co-author Prof. David Walters.<\/p>\n<p>However, the study also suggests that the lower the level of education, the bigger the gender pay gap, and that on average only PhD graduates achieved income equity.<\/p>\n<p>The authors attribute the link between advanced education and equal incomes to strong collective agreements and progressive labour policies in the sectors PhD graduates gravitate toward, such as academia and government.<\/p>\n<p>The pay gap is greatest among employees in the trades, where on average women earn $32,500 and men earn $40,500 &#8212; 25 per cent more.<\/p>\n<p>Lead author Anthony Jehn says men tend to go into more lucrative trades, such as pipefitting or plumbing, whereas women lean more toward hairdressing or cosmetology.<\/p>\n<p>Published Monday in the journal Higher Education Policy, the study analyzed data from Statistics Canada&#8217;s sweeping 2013 National Graduates Survey, which surveyed trades, college and university graduates three years after graduation &#8212; before factors such as maternity leave start to influence results.<\/p>\n<p>Having children can result in \u201cjob segregation,\u201d a much bigger culprit for pay inequity than unequal paycheques for equivalent work, said Sarah Kaplan, director of the Institute for Gender and the Economy at the University of Toronto&#8217;s Rotman School of Management.<\/p>\n<p>Social attitudes and unconscious biases that \u201cexpect women to do more at home and take care of the kids\u201d often take effect ahead of the onset of motherhood, which may help explain the income gap right out of the gate, she said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe know from the research that women pay a motherhood penalty even before they actually have children themselves,\u201d Kaplan said.<\/p>\n<p>Greater pay equity exists for those who can afford to invest in education, a problem that compounds class divisions along gendered lines, said Jehn.<\/p>\n<p>The difference in income between male master&#8217;s and PhD graduates was virtually non-existent at $69,500 and $70,000, respectively. For women entering the workforce, however, investing in a doctorate meant an average pay bump to $69,000, up from $62,500 for master&#8217;s graduates.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis credentialism benefits those who have more social and economic capital, who are able to put in that investment. It does perpetuate a disparity among those who do not,\u201d Jehn said.<\/p>\n<p>A \u201cculture of gender inequality\u201d in some male-dominated fields discourages women from entering in the first place, said Jehn, who worked on the study with Walters and Prof. Stephanie Howells.<\/p>\n<p>More than one-third of all male respondents majored in the more lucrative fields of math, engineering or computer science, versus five per cent for women, helping explain the income disparity among bachelor&#8217;s and master&#8217;s degree holders.<\/p>\n<p>Pay gaps are smallest among those with liberal arts degrees. The relatively few women who start out in math, engineering and computer science make far less than their male colleagues, the authors found.<\/p>\n<p>Men fresh out of college earned $45,500 on average, versus $38,500 for women. Men with recent undergraduate degrees earned $55,000 while their female counterparts took in $50,500, according to the study.<\/p>\n<p>Those numbers show that adding a bachelor&#8217;s degree to your resume prompts a 22 per cent income boost for men, and a 30 per cent jump for women. The difference points to the potential fruits of education &#8212; particularly for female workers &#8212; but also the financial strain faced disproportionately by women who haven&#8217;t spent as much time in school.<\/p>\n<p>Other studies highlight the divergent value placed on work associated with men and women, respectively.<\/p>\n<p>Truck drivers &#8212; 97 per cent are male &#8212; make a median annual wage of $45,417 working full time, according to a 2016 Oxfam Canada study. Early childhood educators &#8212; 97 per cent are female &#8212; make a median wage of $25,334 a year.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat says something about our society &#8212; what type of work we value and what we don&#8217;t,\u201d said Lauren Ravon, director of policy and campaigns at Oxfam Canada. \u201cSexual stereotypes die hard.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Even among PhD graduates, however, income gaps persist later in life as \u201cthe motherhood penalty and the fatherhood bonus\u201d come into play.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cEducation is not the magic bullet,\u201d Ravon said.<\/p>\n<p>The University of Guelph study excludes accredited professions, including teaching, nursing and law, Jehn said, where strong regulation helps narrow the income gap.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The wage gap has closed between women and men with newly earned PhDs &#8212; though the numbers are less comforting &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":228609,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-228601","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-business","mauthors-christopher-reynolds","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228601","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=228601"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228601\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":228611,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228601\/revisions\/228611"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/228609"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=228601"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=228601"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=228601"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}