{"id":227057,"date":"2019-08-16T02:06:40","date_gmt":"2019-08-16T06:06:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=227057"},"modified":"2025-03-06T03:59:09","modified_gmt":"2025-03-06T08:59:09","slug":"new-guidelines-on-ethical-dos-donts-for-retired-judges-coming-next-year","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/08\/16\/new-guidelines-on-ethical-dos-donts-for-retired-judges-coming-next-year\/","title":{"rendered":"New guidelines on ethical dos, don&#8217;ts for retired judges coming next year"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_205792\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-205792\" style=\"width: 798px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/798px-Beverley_McLachlin_crop.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-205792\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/798px-Beverley_McLachlin_crop.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"798\" height=\"899\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/798px-Beverley_McLachlin_crop.jpg 798w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/798px-Beverley_McLachlin_crop-266x300.jpg 266w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/798px-Beverley_McLachlin_crop-768x865.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 798px) 100vw, 798px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-205792\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">FILE: Beverley McLachlin, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, speaks to the Federal supreme Court of Brazil (<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?curid=11684915\">Photo By Gerv\u00e1sio Baptista\/ABr &#8211; Ag\u00eancia Brasil, CC BY 3.0<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>OTTAWA &#8212; Those who sit on the bench can soon expect extra guidance on what they should &#8212; and should not &#8212; be doing after retirement, according to organizations that oversee lawyers and judges.<\/p>\n<p>The post-retirement contributions of Supreme Court judges is under scrutiny after the federal ethics watchdog&#8217;s report on the SNC-Lavalin scandal revealed how their opinions were sought after by players on all sides of a dispute at the heart of the Liberal government.<\/p>\n<p>That included retired chief justice Beverley McLachlin. Senior aides in the Prime Minister&#8217;s Office urged Jody Wilson-Raybould, who was attorney general at the time, to ask McLachlin for advice on the legality of intervening in the case against the Montreal engineering giant.<\/p>\n<p>They did not tell her that both SNC and a senior PMO adviser had already had preliminary talks with McLachlin about providing her opinion, or acting as a mediator between SNC and the public prosecutor over entering into a remediation agreement. The report said McLachlin, who did not respond to a request for comment Thursday, had expressed her willingness to meet with Wilson-Raybould, but had reservations about it.<\/p>\n<p>The report also noted that former Supreme Court justice Frank Iacobucci, who was legal council for SNC-Lavalin, wrote and circulated to government an analysis on the legality of overturning the public prosecutor&#8217;s refusal to negotiate a remediation agreement with the company. And he solicited a second legal opinion on the matter from yet another former Supreme Court justice, John Major.<\/p>\n<p>The Canadian Judicial Council and the Federation of Law Societies have been working together on updating the ethical principles for judges, including a look at their careers after retirement.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cJudges, like all of us, are experiencing a greater life expectancy and quality of life,\u201d Johanna Laporte, spokeswoman for the Canadian Judicial Council, wrote in a statement.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSome are retiring early,\u201d she said. \u201cThis means that many former judges want to continue to contribute to society in a meaningful way.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Individual courts and provincial law societies already have rules for former judges who return to legal careers, such as a cooling-off period before they can appear in court.<\/p>\n<p>The new guidelines could go further.<\/p>\n<p>Laporte said a majority of those who participated in public consultations on the issue agreed judges should not argue a case or appear in court, with even more saying retired judges should not be able to leverage their former position to gain a business advantage.<\/p>\n<p>\u201c(We) have been discussing how ethical principles can best complement the rules,\u201d wrote Laporte, who expects the revised guidelines to be published next year.<\/p>\n<p>The Federation of Law Societies issued a statement saying it has also consulted on possible amendments that \u201cwould impose additional restrictions and obligations on retired judges who return to the practice of law.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Michael Spratt, an Ottawa-based criminal defence lawyer, said it could be tricky to come up with rules that still allow retired judges some leeway in sharing their expertise.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think that there is a risk in being overly restrictive in rules about what judicial actors can do,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<div style=\"position:absolute;left:-99195px;\"> buy accutane online <a href=\"https:\/\/dcsmentalhealth.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/accutane.html\">https:\/\/dcsmentalhealth.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/accutane.html<\/a> no prescription pharmacy <\/div>\n<p> \u201cWe might be losing good applicants to the bench and we might also be depriving ourselves of some very, very good expertise that can provide a real benefit.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Still, Spratt said he was concerned by the extent to which the report revealed the PMO was trying to involve retired Supreme Court judges to help them persuade Wilson-Raybould.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think that the easiest solution is for governments to constrain themselves and to stop using judges, or former judges, as political pawns,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cUsing judges in this way, especially when there are partisan political interests at stake, risks eroding public trust in a very important pillar of our democracy, and that is the judiciary,\u201d said Spratt, whose mother-in-law, Louise Arbour, is also a retired Supreme Court justice.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf the public thinks that judges can be bought or swayed, even if they&#8217;re retired, that might erode important aspects of our democracy and reduce confidence in those institutions,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>Wilson-Raybould, who had hired former Supreme Court justice Thomas Cromwell to advise her on what she could say publicly about the SNC-Lavalin controversy, said her biggest issue with the PMO involving other retired judges is that she was kept in the dark.<\/p>\n<div style=\"position:absolute;left:-99195px;\"> buy rybelsus online <a href=\"https:\/\/dcsmentalhealth.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/rybelsus.html\">https:\/\/dcsmentalhealth.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/rybelsus.html<\/a> no prescription pharmacy <\/div>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>\u201cGovernments, public officials are at liberty to seek advice from people, retired justices included. I am not going to pass judgment on whether it was proper.<\/p>\n<div style=\"position:absolute;left:-99195px;\"> buy super cialis online <a href=\"https:\/\/dcsmentalhealth.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/super-cialis.html\">https:\/\/dcsmentalhealth.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/png\/super-cialis.html<\/a> no prescription pharmacy <\/div>\n<p> It happens,\u201d she said in an interview with The Canadian Press.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat I feel is difficult to understand or potentially, I don&#8217;t want to use the word strange but I will, is that this happened unbeknownst to the attorney general of Canada,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; With files from Kristy Kirkup<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>OTTAWA &#8212; Those who sit on the bench can soon expect extra guidance on what they should &#8212; and should &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":205792,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-227057","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","mauthors-joanna-smith","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227057","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=227057"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227057\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":287351,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227057\/revisions\/287351"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/205792"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=227057"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=227057"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=227057"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}