{"id":226754,"date":"2019-08-13T22:18:32","date_gmt":"2019-08-14T02:18:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=226754"},"modified":"2019-08-13T22:18:32","modified_gmt":"2019-08-14T02:18:32","slug":"judge-greenlights-class-action-lawsuit-against-air-canada-over-fuel-surcharges","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/08\/13\/judge-greenlights-class-action-lawsuit-against-air-canada-over-fuel-surcharges\/","title":{"rendered":"Judge greenlights class action lawsuit against Air Canada over fuel surcharges"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
FILE: The Air Canada headquarters (Building 2 or Centre Air Canada at 7373 Boulevard C\u00f4te-Vertu Ouest) at Montr\u00e9al\u2013Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport (Photo By P199 – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

MONTREAL \u2014 A Quebec Superior Court judge has authorized a class action lawsuit against Air Canada after the company allegedly used a surcharge to bill passengers for the cost of fuel and then some.<\/p>\n

The lawsuit, approved to proceed as a class action Monday, argues the country’s largest airline \u201cillegally overcharged its customers\u201d by more than 200 per cent \u2014 and more than the fuel cost itself \u2014 on some flights.<\/p>\n

Michael Vathilakis, the petitioners’ lawyer, said Air Canada misrepresented the stated purpose of the surcharge, which was to partially offset the fluctuating price of jet fuel.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhat Air Canada did was represented to passengers that they were collecting this amount in order to offset volatility, when in fact the allegations are that they were in many cases actually reaping a real profit on it,\u201d Vathilakis said in a phone interview.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn multiple cases, they charged an amount that was equal to or higher than the entire cost of fuel for the flight.\u201d<\/p>\n

The lawsuit cites one example in which Air Canada allegedly charged business and economy passengers 105 per cent of the total fuel cost on a flight to Paris in January 2014.<\/p>\n

Each economy passenger on that flight allegedly paid $238 in fuel surcharges alone \u2014 $163 more than they should have, according to Air Canada’s definition of the charge. The airline took in $73,878 in fuel supplements on the flight, rather than the $23,164 it should have charged, according to the lawsuit.<\/p>\n

The suit states Air Canada’s contract with consumers allows it to charge them up to one-third of the cost of fuel.<\/p>\n

The class action concerns customers in Quebec who bought international tickets to destinations outside the U.S., Mexico and the Caribbean between April 2012 and November 2014.<\/p>\n

The plaintiffs, brothers George and David Itzkovitz, are requesting damages of $273 million for affected passengers.<\/p>\n

Air Canada said Tuesday it disagrees with the allegations.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe intend to vigorously defend our position through the courts,\u201d spokeswoman Angela Mah said in an email.<\/p>\n

The lawsuit is not the first time frustration over fuel charges has bubbled to the surface.<\/p>\n

Last year, the Quebec Court of Appeal upheld a lower court authorization of a class action lawsuit for provincial residents who paid fuel surcharges when redeeming Aeroplan points to buy Air Canada flights within Canada or the U.S.<\/p>\n

In 2017, the Quebec Superior Court authorized a class action against Air Canada over fuel surcharges that allegedly topped actual fuel costs on international flights.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

MONTREAL \u2014 A Quebec Superior Court judge has authorized a class action lawsuit against Air Canada after the company allegedly …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":213149,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-226754","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","mauthors-christopher-reynolds","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226754","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=226754"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226754\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":226756,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226754\/revisions\/226756"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/213149"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=226754"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=226754"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=226754"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}