{"id":226602,"date":"2019-08-12T21:07:58","date_gmt":"2019-08-13T01:07:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=226602"},"modified":"2019-08-12T21:07:58","modified_gmt":"2019-08-13T01:07:58","slug":"five-parties-invited-to-televised-leaders-debates-bernier-left-out-for-now","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/08\/12\/five-parties-invited-to-televised-leaders-debates-bernier-left-out-for-now\/","title":{"rendered":"Five parties invited to televised leaders&#8217; debates, Bernier left out for now"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_226604\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-226604\" style=\"width: 960px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/62608973_2153539438078259_5387979444256243712_n.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-226604\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/62608973_2153539438078259_5387979444256243712_n.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"960\" height=\"720\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/62608973_2153539438078259_5387979444256243712_n.jpg 960w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/62608973_2153539438078259_5387979444256243712_n-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/62608973_2153539438078259_5387979444256243712_n-768x576.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-226604\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The People&#8217;s Party couldn&#8217;t meet the first criteria, since it wasn&#8217;t established until after the 2015 election and its only member, Quebec MP Maxime Bernier, won his seat as a Conservative. It has met the second requirement, the Leaders&#8217; Debates Commission acknowledged. (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/peoplespca\/photos\/a.1790413527724187\/2153539431411593\/?type=3&amp;theater\">File Photo<\/a>: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/peoplespca\/\">People&#8217;s Party of Canada\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>OTTAWA \u2014 The leaders of Canada&#8217;s five main political parties were invited Monday to take part in this October&#8217;s televised federal election debates, but the newly formed People&#8217;s Party of Canada has been left out in the cold.<\/p>\n<p>The Liberals, Conservatives, NDP, Bloc Quebecois and Greens have all qualified for the debates, to be held Oct. 7 and Oct. 10, under criteria established by the federal government.<\/p>\n<p>To participate, the parties had to meet two of three criteria, including having one sitting member elected under the party banner and candidates running in 90 per cent of Canada&#8217;s electoral ridings in the Oct. 21 election. The third stipulation requires that a party either have earned 4 per cent of the votes cast in the 2015 election, or candidates with a \u201clegitimate chance\u201d to win seats this fall.<\/p>\n<p>Each party was asked to write a letter to the commission to make their case for why they qualified.<\/p>\n<p>The People&#8217;s Party couldn&#8217;t meet the first criteria, since it wasn&#8217;t established until after the 2015 election and its only member, Quebec MP Maxime Bernier, won his seat as a Conservative. It has met the second requirement, the Leaders&#8217; Debates Commission acknowledged.<\/p>\n<p>However, it does not currently have a \u201clegitimate chance of electing more than one candidate in the next federal election,\u201d debates commissioner and former governor general David Johnston said in a statement.<\/p>\n<p>The party promptly disagreed, noting in a response that in the current political climate, a populist party has \u201can excellent chance of rapid growth and electing candidates.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cCanadians have the right to hear views that differ from those of established parties,\u201d Bernier said.<\/p>\n<p>Calling Monday&#8217;s decision a \u201cpreliminary assessment,\u201d the commission said it would give the party until Sept. 9 to further make its case. The commission will make a final decision by Sept. 16.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAs we moved forward, we didn&#8217;t believe we had enough evidence to make a decision, that it would have been unfair to Mr. Bernier to call the shot in early August,\u201d Michel Cormier, executive director of the commission, said Monday in an interview.<\/p>\n<p>Giving the party more time will allow a snapshot of the party&#8217;s prospects as close to the election as possible, while still allowing time to organize the debate properly, Cormier said.<\/p>\n<p>In determining whether the candidates had a \u201clegitimate chance,\u201d the commission considered a variety of sources of information, including evidence from the parties, national and riding-level polls, past candidate performance, membership, fundraising and media visibility, he added.<\/p>\n<p>There is no specific threshold for poll numbers, for example, that would have constituted a legitimate chance of election, Cormier acknowledged, calling the determination a \u201cdifficult question.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>OTTAWA \u2014 The leaders of Canada&#8217;s five main political parties were invited Monday to take part in this October&#8217;s televised &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":226604,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-226602","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","mauthors-christian-paas-lang","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226602","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=226602"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226602\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":226606,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226602\/revisions\/226606"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/226604"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=226602"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=226602"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=226602"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}