{"id":225591,"date":"2019-08-03T19:26:31","date_gmt":"2019-08-03T23:26:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=225591"},"modified":"2019-08-03T19:26:31","modified_gmt":"2019-08-03T23:26:31","slug":"poll-shows-freedom-of-speech-very-strong-in-ph","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/08\/03\/poll-shows-freedom-of-speech-very-strong-in-ph\/","title":{"rendered":"Poll shows freedom of speech very strong in PH"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_41481\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-41481\" style=\"width: 1000px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/shutterstock_108745607.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-41481\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/shutterstock_108745607.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1000\" height=\"750\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/shutterstock_108745607.jpg 1000w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/shutterstock_108745607-300x225.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-41481\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">In its survey results released on Saturday, the SWS said 59 percent of Filipinos agree while 18 percent disagree that \u201cthey are free to say anything openly without fear even if it is against the administration\u201d. (Shutterstock Photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong>MANILA<\/strong>\u00a0&#8212; While some sectors say that freedom of speech is not exercised in the Philippines, a survey from poll firm Social Weather Stations (SWS) reveal that Filipinos think otherwise.<\/p>\n<p>In its survey results released on Saturday, the SWS said 59 percent of Filipinos agree while 18 percent disagree that \u201cthey are free to say anything openly without fear even if it is against the administration\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>The survey, conducted from June 22-26 this year, showed that 23 percent are undecided about the matter.<\/p>\n<p>It also revealed that 67 percent agree, 23 percent are undecided, and 10 percent disagree.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMass media in the Philippines have freedom of speech, of expression and of the press,&#8221; for a very strong net agreement of +57,\u201d SWS statement said.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Surveys of freedom of speech<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The poll firm first tested this type of survey in July 1985, during the Marcos regime, and found only 33 percent agreed, while 29 percent disagreed, for a record-low net agreement of a neutral +3.<\/p>\n<p>Freedom of speech has been probed 40 times from 1985 to the present. Its net score averaged +33 during the administration of Corazon Aquino, +38 in the time of Fidel Ramos, +41 in the time of Joseph Estrada, +34 in the time of Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, and +32 in the time of Benigno Aquino III.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn the five times it was surveyed under the Duterte administration, it ranged from a moderate +23 to a strong +41,\u201d the SWS release read.<\/p>\n<p>The recent survey debunks assumptions of online media agency Rappler who has earlier argued their freedom of speech is being challenged as the news outlet projects itself as a fierce critic of the administration.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MANILA\u00a0&#8212; While some sectors say that freedom of speech is not exercised in the Philippines, a survey from poll firm &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":41481,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,95],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-225591","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-ph","mauthors-christine-cudis","mauthors-philippine-news-agency"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225591","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=225591"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225591\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":225592,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225591\/revisions\/225592"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/41481"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=225591"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=225591"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=225591"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}