{"id":224196,"date":"2019-07-24T03:21:52","date_gmt":"2019-07-24T07:21:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=224196"},"modified":"2019-07-24T03:21:52","modified_gmt":"2019-07-24T07:21:52","slug":"pakistan-pm-says-hell-work-with-us-on-afghanistan-accord","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/07\/24\/pakistan-pm-says-hell-work-with-us-on-afghanistan-accord\/","title":{"rendered":"Pakistan PM says he’ll work with US on Afghanistan accord"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
But Khan said he’s spoken with Afghan President Ashraf Ghani and he will reach out to the militant group when he returns to Pakistan. He met Monday with President Donald Trump. (File Photo<\/a>: Imran Khan (official)\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

WASHINGTON \u2014 After years of tension between Washington and Islamabad, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan insisted Tuesday the two are now on the same page and said he will do his best to persuade the Taliban to open negotiations with the Afghan government to resolve the war.<\/p>\n

The U.S. has been engaging with the Taliban, but so far they have refused to talk directly to the Afghan government, which it sees as a puppet. Afghans are wary of Pakistan’s involvement in crafting a future for their country, but Khan said the Taliban need to participate in the next Afghan presidential election in September.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt’s not easy. It’s not going to be easy,\u201d Khan said about getting the Taliban and the Afghan government to the negotiating table.<\/p>\n

Khan said the Taliban delegation to the U.S. negotiations asked to meet with him a few months ago probably because the prime minister has maintained there is no military solution to the war in Afghanistan. He said at the time that he didn’t do it because the Afghan government didn’t want him meeting with the Taliban.<\/p>\n

But Khan said he’s spoken with Afghan President Ashraf Ghani and he will reach out to the militant group when he returns to Pakistan. He met Monday with President Donald Trump.<\/p>\n

\u201cNow, I will meet the Taliban and I will try my best to get them to talk to the Afghan government,\u201d Khan said at the U.S. Institute of Peace in Washington. \u201cThe election in Afghanistan must be an inclusive election where the Taliban are also participating.\u201d<\/p>\n

With all the talk about peace negotiations, Afghans were stunned Monday when Trump said he could unleash the U.S. military and wipe Afghanistan off \u201cthe face of the earth\u201d in a week or 10 days.<\/p>\n

Trump’s casual comments were viewed with alarm because the war has not been between the U.S. and Afghanistan. For years, Afghan security forces have fought alongside their U.S. and NATO partners against the Taliban.<\/p>\n

Ghani’s office in Kabul on Tuesday asked Trump to clarify his statement and said Afghanistan will never \u201callow any foreign power to determine its fate.\u201d<\/p>\n

Afghans also are wary of statements coming from Pakistan. For years, they have accused Pakistan of creating instability in their country by giving militants a safe place from which to stage attacks across the two countries’ long, porous border.<\/p>\n

Washington also has blamed Pakistan for harbouring the insurgency, making it impossible to defeat the militants, who now control roughly half of Afghanistan, but not the cities.<\/p>\n

Khan insisted that Pakistan is changing.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is the intent of Pakistan that we do not allow any armed militias in our country,\u201d he said, acknowledging that they still reside in the country, but that the army was working to disarm them.<\/p>\n

A senior administration official said the U.S. welcomes his pledge that Pakistan will not allow its soil to be used by militant groups, but said the administration was \u201cclear-eyed\u201d about the support that Pakistan’s military and intelligence services have given to militant groups and will look for \u201cconcrete action.\u201d The official spoke only on condition of anonymity to brief reporters before Khan’s visit.<\/p>\n

Khan said his meeting with Trump went well and that he believes the U.S. and Pakistan are now \u201con the same page.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWe loved our meeting with President Trump yesterday,\u201d Khan said in a morning meeting with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. \u201cI told the president, I said ‘I’ve been a public guy for 40 years, and so when you go meet someone who is high-profile you get a lot of advice,’ Never have I gotten so much advice.\u201d<\/p>\n

Warming relations would mark a turnaround for Khan and Trump, who has been sharply critical of Pakistan. The Obama administration increased military and economic aid to around $3 billion a year, but Trump cut it to about $70 million in the current fiscal year, saying the U.S. was sending money to Pakistan, but was getting only \u201clies’ in return.<\/p>\n

Khan said he didn’t ask Trump to restore the aid, which he said had created a \u201cdependency syndrome\u201d in Pakistan. Khan said he wants Pakistan to have a \u201cdignified\u201d relationship with the U.S. based on \u201cmutual trust.\u201d Khan said he never felt more humiliated than when the U.S. carried out the raid on al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden’s compound inside Pakistan without giving Islamabad a heads-up.<\/p>\n

\u201cOur ally didn’t trust us,\u201d he said. \u201cFor every Pakistani, it was humiliating.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

WASHINGTON \u2014 After years of tension between Washington and Islamabad, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan insisted Tuesday the two are …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":224198,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-224196","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","mauthors-deb-riechmann","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224196","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=224196"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224196\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":224199,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224196\/revisions\/224199"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/224198"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=224196"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=224196"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=224196"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}