{"id":222491,"date":"2019-07-11T02:48:08","date_gmt":"2019-07-11T06:48:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=222491"},"modified":"2019-07-11T02:48:08","modified_gmt":"2019-07-11T06:48:08","slug":"facing-calls-for-resignation-acosta-defends-epstein-deal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/07\/11\/facing-calls-for-resignation-acosta-defends-epstein-deal\/","title":{"rendered":"Facing calls for resignation, Acosta defends Epstein deal"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_222492\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-222492\" style=\"width: 556px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/556px-Alexander_Acosta_official_portrait.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-222492\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/556px-Alexander_Acosta_official_portrait.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"556\" height=\"719\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/556px-Alexander_Acosta_official_portrait.jpg 556w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/556px-Alexander_Acosta_official_portrait-768x993.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 556px) 100vw, 556px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-222492\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">FILE: U.S. Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta Official Photograph (<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?curid=59907232\">Photo By US Department of Labor &#8211; U.S. Secretary of Labor R. Alexander Acosta Official Photograph, Public Domain<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>WASHINGTON &#8212; Trying to tamp down calls for his resignation, Labor Secretary Alex Acosta on Wednesday defended his handling of a sex-trafficking case involving now-jailed financier Jeffrey Epstein, insisting he got the toughest deal he could at the time.<\/p>\n<p>In a nearly hour-long news conference, Acosta retraced the steps that federal prosecutors took in the case when he was U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Florida a decade ago, insisting that \u201cin our heart we were trying to do the right thing for these victims.\u201d He said prosecutors were working to avoid a more lenient arrangement that would have allowed Epstein to \u201cwalk free.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe believe that we proceeded appropriately,\u201d he said, a contention challenged by critics who say Epstein&#8217;s penalty was egregiously light.<\/p>\n<p>The episode reignited this week when federal prosecutors in New York brought a new round of child sex-trafficking charges against the wealthy hedge fund manager. And on Wednesday, a new accuser stepped forward to say Epstein raped her in his New York mansion when she was 15.<\/p>\n<p>Jennifer Araoz, now 32, told \u201cToday\u201d she never went to police because she feared retribution from the well-connected Epstein. She now has filed court papers seeking information from Epstein in preparation for suing him.<\/p>\n<p>While the handling of the case arose during Acosta&#8217;s confirmation hearings, it has come under fresh and intense scrutiny after the prosecutors in New York brought their charges on Monday, alleging Epstein abused dozens of underage girls in the early 2000s, paying them hundreds of dollars in cash for massages, then molesting them at his homes in Florida and New York. Epstein has pleaded not guilty to the charges; if convicted he could be imprisoned for the rest of his life.<\/p>\n<p>Acosta&#8217;s lawyerly presentation was an effort to push back against growing criticism of his work in a secret 2008 plea deal that let Epstein avoid federal prosecution on charges that he molested teenage girls. A West Palm Beach judge found this year that the deal had violated the Crime Victims&#8217; Rights Act because the victims were not informed or consulted.<\/p>\n<p>He was also out to persuade President Donald\u00a0Trump\u00a0to keep him on the job as Democratic presidential candidates and party leaders called for his ouster.<\/p>\n<p>Acosta insisted his office did the best it could under the circumstances a decade ago. He said state authorities had planned to go after Epstein with charges that would have resulted in no jail time until his office intervened and pressed for tougher consequences, a contention that is supported by the record. The alternative, he said, would have been for federal prosecutors to \u201croll the dice\u201d and hope to win a conviction.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe did what we did because we wanted to see Epstein go to jail,\u201d Acosta said. \u201cHe needed to go to jail.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But Epstein only was given 13 months in a work-release program, which let him work out of the jail six days a week. Acosta said it was \u201centirely appropriate\u201d to be outraged about that leniency, but he blamed that on Florida authorities. \u201cEverything the victims have gone through in these cases is horrific,\u201d he said, while repeatedly refusing to apologize to them.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think it&#8217;s important to stand up for the prosecutors\u201d in his old office, he said.<\/p>\n<p>His account did not sit well with Barry Krischer, who was the Palm Beach County attorney during the case. Krischer, a Democrat, said Acosta \u201cshould not be allowed to rewrite history.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Acosta&#8217;s South Florida office had gotten to the point of drafting an indictment that could have sent Epstein to federal prison for life. But it was never filed, leading to Epstein&#8217;s guilty plea to two state prostitution-related charges. In addition to the work-release jail sentence, Epstein was required to make payments to victims and register as a sex offender.<\/p>\n<p>Krischer said the federal indictment was \u201cabandoned after secret negotiations between Mr. Epstein&#8217;s lawyers and Mr. Acosta.\u201d He added: \u201cIf Mr. Acosta was truly concerned with the State&#8217;s case and felt he had to rescue the matter, he would have moved forward with the 53-page indictment that his own office drafted.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Acosta has said he welcomes the new case, and earlier defended himself on Twitter, crediting \u201cnew evidence and additional testimony\u201d uncovered by prosecutors in New York for providing \u201can important opportunity to more fully bring him to justice.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Pressed on whether he had any regrets, Acosta repeatedly suggested that circumstances had changed since the case arose. \u201cWe now have 12 years of knowledge and hindsight and we live in a very different world,\u201d he said. \u201cToday&#8217;s world treats victims very, very differently.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Trump\u00a0has, so far, also defended Acosta, praising his work as labour secretary and saying he felt \u201cvery badly\u201d for him \u201cbecause I&#8217;ve known him as being somebody that works so hard and has done such a good job.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Though\u00a0Trump\u00a0may have made the tagline \u201cYou&#8217;re fired!\u201d famous on his reality show \u201cThe Apprentice,\u201d he has shown a pattern of reluctance to fire even his most embattled aides.\u00a0Trump, for instance, took months to dismiss Scott Pruitt as Environmental Protection Agency administrator despite a dizzying array of scandals, and allowed Jeff Sessions to remain as attorney general for more than a year even as he railed at and belittled him.<\/p>\n<p>Trump\u00a0typically gives his Cabinet secretaries the opportunity to defend themselves publicly in interviews and press conferences before deciding whether to pull the plug. Indeed, he encouraged Acosta to hold Wednesday&#8217;s press conference laying out his thinking and involvement in the plea deal, according to a senior administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.<\/p>\n<p>Early reaction in the White House appeared to be positive, with one official saying the performance was likely enough to buy Acosta more time unless questions about his part in the 2008 case linger in the news. Vice-President Mike Pence said he was \u201cpleased to see Secretary Acosta step forward.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Trump\u00a0has his own long personal history with Epstein, but has dissociated himself from the wealthy hedge fund manager, saying this week the two had a falling out 15 or so years ago and haven&#8217;t spoken since.<\/p>\n<p>Acosta told reporters that his relationship with\u00a0Trump\u00a0remains \u201coutstanding,\u201d but also noted that every member of\u00a0Trump&#8217;s Cabinet serves at the president&#8217;s pleasure.<\/p>\n<p>Democratic presidential contenders and party leaders have been calling for Acosta to resign or be fired, and he has been called to testify in front of the House Oversight Committee on July 23. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Florida, welcomed that move, saying Acosta \u201chas a disturbing record on sexual and human trafficking that stretches from the horribly permissive plea agreement he gave to Jeffrey Epstein, up to his time now as Labor Secretary.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Many Senate Republicans, meanwhile, have taken a wait-and-see approach.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Associated Press writers Alan Fram, Zeke Miller and Darlene Superville in Washington and Curt Anderson in Miami contributed to this report.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>WASHINGTON &#8212; Trying to tamp down calls for his resignation, Labor Secretary Alex Acosta on Wednesday defended his handling of &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":222492,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-222491","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","mauthors-jill-colvin","mauthors-richard-lardner","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222491","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222491"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222491\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":222493,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222491\/revisions\/222493"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/222492"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222491"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222491"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222491"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}