{"id":222063,"date":"2019-07-08T20:55:22","date_gmt":"2019-07-09T00:55:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=222063"},"modified":"2019-07-08T20:55:22","modified_gmt":"2019-07-09T00:55:22","slug":"canntrust-warns-of-shortages-after-regulator-flags-greenhouse-for-non-compliance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/07\/08\/canntrust-warns-of-shortages-after-regulator-flags-greenhouse-for-non-compliance\/","title":{"rendered":"CannTrust warns of shortages after regulator flags greenhouse for non-compliance"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_222064\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-222064\" style=\"width: 1200px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/D2w01j9XQAAjfba.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-222064\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/D2w01j9XQAAjfba.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1200\" height=\"800\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/D2w01j9XQAAjfba.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/D2w01j9XQAAjfba-768x512.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-222064\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The licensed producer said Monday that Health Canada notified the company that it found CannTrust grew cannabis in five unlicensed rooms at its Pelham, Ont., facility and that employees provided inaccurate information to federal regulators. (File <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/CannTrust\/status\/1111321310066556928\">Photo<\/a>: <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/CannTrust\/\">@CannTrust\/Twitter<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>CannTrust Holdings Inc. shares plunged more than 20 per cent Monday after it was revealed that Health Canada discovered illegal growing operations at a greenhouse and ordered 5,200 kilograms of the pot producer&#8217;s inventory put on hold.<\/p>\n<p>The licensed producer said Monday that Health Canada notified the company that it found CannTrust grew cannabis in five unlicensed rooms at its Pelham, Ont., facility and that employees provided inaccurate information to federal regulators.<\/p>\n<p>The company said the growing in the unlicensed rooms took place from October 2018 to March 2019 when it had pending applications for the rooms with Health Canada. Licences were issued for each of the five rooms in April 2019. There are 12 rooms in total at the facility.<\/p>\n<p>\u201c(The rooms) were constructed in a very compliant way with Health Canada&#8230; Where the mistake was made was plants were put in those rooms before the actual approvals were received,\u201d chief executive Peter Aceto said.<\/p>\n<p>Aceto said Health Canada came to its facility for an inspection in June, during which the inaccurate information was provided to the regulator. CannTrust received Health Canada&#8217;s inspection report on July 3.<\/p>\n<p>He said it is unclear at this stage what transpired, but CannTrust has hired an external firm to conduct a \u201croot-cause analysis,\u201d and determine how this occurred.<\/p>\n<p>The company also said some of the product from these previously unlicensed rooms was distributed for sale. These products passed quality control testing at Health Canada certified labs and the company&#8217;s own quality control processes, CannTrust said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cCannTrust is clearly acknowledging that mistakes were made here&#8230; This is a high priority for us to correct these mistakes, particularly with Health Canada,\u201d Aceto said. \u201cWe&#8217;ve got a very clear process in place in order to get ourselves back into compliance as quickly as we possibly can.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Aceto added that roughly 5,200 kilograms of product put on hold by Health Canada, combined with 7,500 kilograms of products from its Vaughan, Ont.-facility which CannTrust voluntarily put on hold, represents the \u201cmajority\u201d of its inventory.<\/p>\n<p>CannTrust&#8217;s total harvested production during its latest quarter ended March 31 amounted to 9,424 kilograms.<\/p>\n<p>He said CannTrust&#8217;s other inventory on hand amounts to \u201cseveral days worth of supply,\u201d noting that the company continues to grow, cultivate, harvest and sell cannabis.<\/p>\n<p>The firm has a team working to source cannabis to fill supply gaps, Aceto said.<\/p>\n<p>He added that by July 17 CannTrust will provide a written response to Health Canada, including an explanation, mitigating factors and changes the company has made.<\/p>\n<p>One employee who worked at the Niagara-area facility has been terminated, but Aceto would not say what role that person held.<\/p>\n<p>Graeme Kreindler, an analyst with Eight Capital Research, said the amount of inventory on hold represents roughly 71 per cent of its inventory, and 4.2 times its last quarterly sales volume.<\/p>\n<p>He estimated that between $28 million and $69 million in future sales could be at risk.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere remains a high degree of uncertainty with respect to the potential for future legal and regulatory repercussions,\u201d Kreindler said in a note to clients. \u201cThis includes a possible license suspension or revocation by the regulator.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Under the Cannabis Act, the regulator may suspend a licence or permit to protect public health or safety.<\/p>\n<p>CannTrust also said Monday it has voluntarily advised Health Canada of \u201cissues that may impact compliance at its Vaughan facility regarding product storage.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The company said the impact of these matters on CannTrust&#8217;s financial results are unknown until Health Canada completes its quality testing of the held-back product from its Pelham greenhouse. Results are expected in 10 to 12 business days.<\/p>\n<p>Canaccord Genuity analyst Derek Dley said the breach of regulations will likely impact its upcoming quarterly results in a material way.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe believe it is highly likely the company will be forced to destroy the product that was produced within the non-compliant grow rooms,\u201d he said in a note to clients.<\/p>\n<p>However, Dley added that it believes this is a \u201cone-time issue\u201d and the company is \u201cworking diligently to ensure it can rectify the situation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Ryan Tomkins, an analyst with Jefferies, said in the near-term there will \u201cundoubtedly be a financial impact.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThey will have to go to the open market to fill the shortage gap with little bargaining power which means they could pay inflated prices or take inferior product which could lead to lost market share,\u201d he said in a note to clients.<\/p>\n<p>In the long-term, there will be an impact on CannTrust&#8217;s credibility, Tomkins added.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe fact the company never spotted this, or indeed still doesn&#8217;t know how it happened, is a concern,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFor us, this will make institutional investors think twice, and could also likely make it harder for CannTrust to attract high quality\u201d partnerships with consumer-packaged goods companies.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>CannTrust shares closed down $1.46 or roughly 22.6 per cent at $5 in Monday trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CannTrust Holdings Inc. shares plunged more than 20 per cent Monday after it was revealed that Health Canada discovered illegal &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":222064,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-222063","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-business","mauthors-armina-ligaya","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222063","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222063"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222063\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":222065,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222063\/revisions\/222065"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/222064"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222063"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222063"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222063"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}