{"id":218154,"date":"2019-06-09T22:41:25","date_gmt":"2019-06-10T02:41:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=218154"},"modified":"2019-06-09T22:41:25","modified_gmt":"2019-06-10T02:41:25","slug":"massive-extradition-bill-protest-fills-hong-kong-streets","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/06\/09\/massive-extradition-bill-protest-fills-hong-kong-streets\/","title":{"rendered":"Massive extradition bill protest fills Hong Kong streets"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_218155\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-218155\" style=\"width: 1000px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/shutterstock_1416523730.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-218155\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/shutterstock_1416523730.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1000\" height=\"667\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/shutterstock_1416523730.jpg 1000w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/shutterstock_1416523730-768x512.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-218155\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">FILE: Hong Kong\/HKSAR &#8211; April 28 2019: Protest extradition law (Photo: omonphotography \/ Shutterstock.com)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>HONG\u00a0KONG\u00a0&#8212; Hundreds of thousands of protesters marched through\u00a0Hong\u00a0Kong\u00a0on Sunday to voice their opposition to legislation that would allow people to be extradited to mainland China where they could face politically charged trials.<\/p>\n<p>The massive demonstration took place three days before the semi-autonomous Chinese territory&#8217;s government plans to bring the highly contentious bill to the full legislature in a bid to win approval by the end of the month.<\/p>\n<p>Police estimated the crowd at 240,000, but organizers said more than 1 million took part.<\/p>\n<p>The protest was one of the largest in recent\u00a0Hong\u00a0Kong\u00a0history, underscoring fears over China&#8217;s broadening footprint in the former British colony. It appeared to be even bigger than a massive pro-democracy demonstration in 2003 against a proposed national security law, according to Associated Press journalists who covered both events.<\/p>\n<p>Late Sunday night, a group of demonstrators broke through barriers at government headquarters, where the march had ended. The crowd briefly pushed its way into the lobby, but police in riot gear used batons and pepper spray to push the protesters outside. Most had dispersed by 1 a.m., but police continued pushing protesters away for kilometres over a period of two to three hours.<\/p>\n<p>There was still a strong police presence on streets throughout downtown\u00a0Hong\u00a0Kong\u00a0as of 3 a.m. Monday.<\/p>\n<p>A small group of protesters sat with hands tied on the side of Gloucester Road, surrounded by police.<\/p>\n<p>People of all ages took part in the march, some pushing strollers and others carrying canes, chanting slogans in the native Cantonese dialect in favour of greater transparency in government.<\/p>\n<p>Kiwi Wong, 27, was among the throng, a member of the younger generation who&#8217;ve grown up enjoying relative prosperity but also growing insecurity about what many see as an erosion of the rights\u00a0HongKong\u00a0residents have enjoyed.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf I didn&#8217;t come out now, I don&#8217;t know when I would have the chance to express my opinion again,\u201d Wong said. \u201cBecause now we&#8217;ve got to this stage, if you don&#8217;t come out to try to do what you can, then it will end up too late, you won&#8217;t be able to say or do anything about it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Alex Ng, a 67-year-old retiree, said he joined the protest because \u201cI think that there was never any public consultation about this law, and there are a lot of uncertainties.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Hong\u00a0Kong&#8217;s leader, Carrie Lam, has pushed forward with the legislation despite widespread criticism from human rights and business groups. The amendments have been criticized as eroding\u00a0Hong\u00a0Kong&#8217;s judicial independence by making it easier to send criminal suspects to mainland China, where they could face vague national security charges and unfair trials.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat can we do to get Carrie Lam to listen to us, how many people have to come out to make her reconsider listening to the public?\u201d said Miu Wong, a 24-year-old office worker who was among the protesters.<\/p>\n<p>Tommy Lam, a 29-year-old who is working on his master&#8217;s degree, said: \u201cAll these people coming out and marching sends a definite message. If the government doesn&#8217;t listen, there will be tension.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The\u00a0Hong\u00a0Kong\u00a0government said in a statement late Sunday that it respected the right of its opponents to protest.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe acknowledge and respect that people have different views on a wide range of issues,\u201d the statement said. \u201cThe procession today is an example of\u00a0Hong\u00a0Kong\u00a0people exercising their freedom of expression within their rights as enshrined in the Basic Law and the\u00a0Hong\u00a0Kong\u00a0Bill of Rights Ordinance.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Hong\u00a0Kong\u00a0was guaranteed the right to retain its own social, legal and political systems for 50 years following its handover from British to Chinese rule in 1997, the so-called \u201cone country, two systems\u201d framework. However, China&#8217;s ruling Communist Party has been seen as increasingly reneging on that agreement by forcing through unpopular legal changes.<\/p>\n<p>Hong\u00a0Kong\u00a0currently limits extraditions to jurisdictions with which it has existing extradition agreements or to others on an individual basis under a law passed before 1997.<\/p>\n<p>China was excluded because of concerns over its poor record on legal independence and human rights. In recent years, mainland authorities have gone after opponents by accusing them of dubious crimes such as tax evasion, crystalizing worries among critics and others.<\/p>\n<p>Lam&#8217;s government argued that the revisions were needed to close legal loopholes, while opponents say that is merely an excuse to pursue China&#8217;s agenda of reducing\u00a0Hong\u00a0Kong&#8217;s legal independence.<\/p>\n<p>Hong\u00a0Kong&#8217;s Legislative Council will table the amendments on the bill on Wednesday.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe people of\u00a0Hong\u00a0Kong\u00a0want to protect our freedom, our freedom of speech, our rule of law, our judicial system, and also our economic foundation, which is welcome to international investors,\u201d activist Lee Cheuk-yan, a former\u00a0Hong\u00a0Kong\u00a0legislator, said Sunday. \u201cIf international investors lose confidence in\u00a0Hong\u00a0Kong\u00a0because of this evil bill, then\u00a0Hong\u00a0Kong, economically, would also be destroyed.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Associated Press videojournalist Raf Wober contributed to this report.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>HONG\u00a0KONG\u00a0&#8212; Hundreds of thousands of protesters marched through\u00a0Hong\u00a0Kong\u00a0on Sunday to voice their opposition to legislation that would allow people to &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":218155,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-218154","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","mauthors-christopher-bodeen","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/218154","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=218154"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/218154\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":218156,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/218154\/revisions\/218156"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/218155"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=218154"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=218154"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=218154"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}