{"id":216552,"date":"2019-05-29T19:40:56","date_gmt":"2019-05-29T23:40:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=216552"},"modified":"2019-05-29T19:40:56","modified_gmt":"2019-05-29T23:40:56","slug":"norman-vance-being-given-privacy-space-on-reinstatement-talks-minister","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/05\/29\/norman-vance-being-given-privacy-space-on-reinstatement-talks-minister\/","title":{"rendered":"Norman, Vance being given &#8216;privacy, space&#8217; on reinstatement talks: Minister"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_216555\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-216555\" style=\"width: 640px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/46770552_1001602600042186_6532775403315003392_n.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-216555\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/46770552_1001602600042186_6532775403315003392_n.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"428\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/46770552_1001602600042186_6532775403315003392_n.jpg 640w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/46770552_1001602600042186_6532775403315003392_n-768x513.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-216555\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Sajjan sidestepped questions over whether the Trudeau government has an opinion on Norman&#8217;s desire to return to duty after the breach- of-trust case against him was dropped earlier this month. (File <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/harjit.sajjan.7\/photos\/a.334281443440975\/1001602596708853\/?type=3&amp;amp;theater\">Photo<\/a>: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/harjit.sajjan.7\/\">Harjit Sajjan\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>OTTAWA \u2014 Vice-Admiral Mark Norman and defence chief Gen. Jonathan Vance are being given \u201ctheir privacy and their space,\u201d Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan insisted Wednesday as he was grilled over why Norman has not yet been reinstated into the military.<\/p>\n<p>Sajjan sidestepped questions over whether the Trudeau government has an opinion on Norman&#8217;s desire to return to duty after the breach- of-trust case against him was dropped earlier this month.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe respect the chief\u00a0of\u00a0defence staff&#8217;s space to be able to manage the people,\u201d the minister told reporters following a morning speech at the annual Cansec arms-trade show. \u201cWhen it comes to the management\u00a0of\u00a0the people, it&#8217;s the chief\u00a0of\u00a0defence staff&#8217;s space.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Norman was the military&#8217;s second-in-command when he was suspended and then charged with breach\u00a0of\u00a0trust last year for allegedly leaking government secrets about a naval contract.<\/p>\n<p>Crown prosecutors stayed the case May 8 after Norman&#8217;s lawyers unearthed new information, at which point Norman said he wanted to return to work. Vance issued a statement that same day saying the military was ready to welcome him back.<\/p>\n<p>Yet while Vance and Norman had what the Defence Department described as a \u201ccordial\u201d meeting last week, there has been no word on when Norman will return to duty, or in what role. His former post has been permanently filled and the Canadian Forces has no other job\u00a0of\u00a0equivalent stature.<\/p>\n<p>Sajjan suggested the matter is out\u00a0of\u00a0the government&#8217;s hands and instead rests completely with Vance and Norman.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe need to respect and to give them that space to have that conversation,\u201d he said. \u201cAnd yes, they have had a meeting and now it&#8217;s up to them to go through their discussion, give them their privacy and a decision will be made on this regard.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Adding to the drama, the Senate&#8217;s defence committee voted on Tuesday night to launch an inquiry into why the charge against Norman was laid and subsequently stayed, with invitations planned for Norman, Vance, Sajjan and others.<\/p>\n<p>Conservatives, who allege Prime Minister Justin Trudeau politically interfered with the case, tried to get the House\u00a0of\u00a0Commons defence committee to initiate an investigation into the matter but the Liberals used their majority to block that effort.<\/p>\n<p>Conservatives had better luck Tuesday with the Senate committee, passing a motion with the support\u00a0of\u00a0Independent Sen. Diane Griffin and non-affiliated Sen. David Adams Richards (the Senate&#8217;s \u201cIndependents\u201d collaborate for certain purposes under the Senate&#8217;s procedural rules; a smaller number\u00a0of\u00a0\u201dnon-affiliated\u201d senators don&#8217;t).<\/p>\n<p>Sajjan said he is prepared to appear before the committee, noting he recently responded to four hours\u00a0of\u00a0questions in the House\u00a0of\u00a0Commons during an unusual evening session, with many\u00a0of\u00a0them focused on the Norman case.<\/p>\n<p>Norman&#8217;s lawyers repeatedly accused the Liberals\u00a0of\u00a0political interference in the RCMP investigation and court case before it was dropped, allegations that Sajjan and the government denied.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI have been clear from the beginning on this that the entire process has been independent and it&#8217;s very important in our democracy to making sure that the process takes its course all the way from investigation to the legal process,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAnd that&#8217;s exactly what has been done.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>OTTAWA \u2014 Vice-Admiral Mark Norman and defence chief Gen. Jonathan Vance are being given \u201ctheir privacy and their space,\u201d Defence &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":216555,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-216552","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","mauthors-lee-berthiaume","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216552","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=216552"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216552\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":216557,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216552\/revisions\/216557"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/216555"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=216552"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=216552"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=216552"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}