{"id":216440,"date":"2019-05-29T03:13:40","date_gmt":"2019-05-29T07:13:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=216440"},"modified":"2019-05-29T03:14:26","modified_gmt":"2019-05-29T07:14:26","slug":"who-clarifies-burnout-not-a-medical-condition-but-occupational-phenomenon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/05\/29\/who-clarifies-burnout-not-a-medical-condition-but-occupational-phenomenon\/","title":{"rendered":"WHO clarifies burnout not a medical condition but &#8216;occupational phenomenon&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_216456\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-216456\" style=\"width: 748px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/stress-work.jpeg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-216456\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/stress-work.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"748\" height=\"500\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/stress-work.jpeg 748w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/stress-work-300x201.jpeg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 748px) 100vw, 748px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-216456\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">In the ICD-11, the WHO defines burnout as &#8220;a syndrome conceptualized as resulting from chronic workplace stress that has not been successfully managed.\u201d (Tim Gouw\/Unsplash)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"p2\">The World Health Organization (WHO) on Tuesday, May 28, clarified that burnout is not a disease.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\">Based on reports earlier, burnout has been listed in WHO&#8217;s latest version of International Classification of Diseases (ICD), a handbook used globally as a benchmark for health diagnosis, dubbed as ICD-11. Burnout can be found under the category of problems associated with employment or unemployment.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\">Contrary to earlier reports, although it is included in the updated ICD list, the WHO clarified on its website under its evidence and research section that burnout is an &#8220;occupational phenomenon&#8221; and not classified as a medical condition.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\">&#8220;It is described in the chapter: &#8216;Factors influencing health status or contact with health services&#8217; &#8212; which includes reasons for which people contact health services but that are not classed as illnesses or health conditions,&#8221; the international body stressed.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\">The WHO said burnout was already included in the past version of the ICD, the ICD-10, in the same category but the definition of it is now &#8220;more detailed.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\">In the ICD-11, the WHO defines burnout as &#8220;a syndrome conceptualized as resulting from chronic workplace stress that has not been successfully managed.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\">Burnout, it noted, can be characterized by three dimensions: feelings of energy depletion or exhaustion, increased mental distance from one\u2019s job, or feelings of negativism or cynicism related to one\u2019s job, and reduced professional efficacy.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\">&#8220;Burn-out refers specifically to phenomena in the occupational context and should not be applied to describe experiences in other areas of life,&#8221; the WHO said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\">The health agency added that it is about to &#8220;embark on the development of evidence-based guidelines on mental well-being in the workplace.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\">The ICD-11 was drafted last year, following recommendations from health experts in different countries. It was only approved last Saturday and will take effect in January 2022.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The World Health Organization (WHO) on Tuesday, May 28, clarified that burnout is not a disease. Based on reports earlier, &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":216456,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-216440","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-health","mauthors-joanna-belle-deala","mauthors-philippine-canadian-inquirer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216440","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=216440"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216440\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":216475,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216440\/revisions\/216475"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/216456"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=216440"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=216440"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=216440"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}