{"id":216237,"date":"2019-05-27T21:29:14","date_gmt":"2019-05-28T01:29:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=216237"},"modified":"2019-05-27T21:29:14","modified_gmt":"2019-05-28T01:29:14","slug":"montreal-mna-calls-out-privileged-politicians-who-collect-big-money-for-leaving-office","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/05\/27\/montreal-mna-calls-out-privileged-politicians-who-collect-big-money-for-leaving-office\/","title":{"rendered":"Montreal MNA calls out privileged politicians who collect big money for leaving office"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_216238\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-216238\" style=\"width: 960px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/17862792_10155172854434061_4066487711384338993_n.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-216238\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/17862792_10155172854434061_4066487711384338993_n.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"960\" height=\"720\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/17862792_10155172854434061_4066487711384338993_n.jpg 960w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/17862792_10155172854434061_4066487711384338993_n-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/17862792_10155172854434061_4066487711384338993_n-768x576.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-216238\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Amir Khadir announced over the weekend he would donate the $90,000 payment he received after leaving office in 2018 as a member of the Quebec solidaire party. (File <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/AmirKhadir\/photos\/a.10151870655824061\/10155172854434061\/?type=3&amp;theater\">Photo<\/a>: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/AmirKhadir\/\">Amir Khadir\/Facebook<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>MONTREAL \u2014 Privileged Quebec politicians shouldn&#8217;t accept generous cheques from taxpayers when they quit politics or lose elections, says a recently departed member of the legislature.<\/p>\n<p>Amir Khadir announced over the weekend he would donate the $90,000 payment he received after leaving office in 2018 as a member of the Quebec solidaire party. He said all the cash will go to community groups in his former Montreal riding.<\/p>\n<p>Quebec politicians are entitled to up to a year&#8217;s salary when they leave office. They can only collect the money if they served a full mandate, lost an election or retired due to a serious family or health-related matter.<\/p>\n<p>The so-called \u201ctransition allowance\u201d is supposed to help pay the bills while they find new work after having sacrificed their time serving the public.<\/p>\n<p>Khadir \u2014 a physician \u2014 says he doesn&#8217;t need the money and wants to send a message to all the other privileged politicians in the province.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf people like me quit and immediately return to their work as lawyers, engineers or doctors, and they have a source of revenue, I don&#8217;t see why they should collect that money,\u201d he said in an interview with The Canadian Press Sunday.<\/p>\n<p>He says he&#8217;s still bothered by the decision of former education minister Yves Bolduc, who quit politics in 2015 \u2014 in the middle of the Liberals&#8217; mandate \u2014 and went back to work as a doctor after pocketing a $150,000 transition allowance.<\/p>\n<p>That episode embarrassed the Liberals and helped push them to change the law. In late 2015, the legislature unanimously adopted a bill removing the automatic right to a cash payment for retiring politicians.<\/p>\n<p>The new rules stipulate departing members can only collect transition allowances if they complete their term in office, with strict exceptions.<\/p>\n<p>But Khadir says the 2015 law isn&#8217;t strict enough.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe need to plant the idea in the heads of our colleagues that the money should be seen as a transition allowance,\u201d he said, \u201cand not as a bonus that we have a right to, and that we can pocket no matter the circumstance.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Ewan Sauves, spokesman for Premier Francois Legault, said Monday that the Coalition Avenir Quebec government has no intention of modifying the law. He said in an email that Khadir&#8217;s decision \u201cbelongs to him\u201d and declined further comment.<\/p>\n<p>Renaud Brossard, Quebec director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, an advocacy group that lobbies for lower taxes and less government spending, said politicians shouldn&#8217;t receive any money for leaving office. He said a number of other provinces offer similar allowances, but Alberta scrapped its program in 2012.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYes, politics is a hard job, but it&#8217;s also a privilege,\u201d he said in an interview Monday. \u201cThis privilege shouldn&#8217;t be a reason for politicians to enrich themselves.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Elected members of the Quebec legislature receive a base salary of $95,704, which increases for cabinet members and other parliamentary office holders.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe salaries of politicians are already high compared with the average Quebecer,\u201d Brossard said. \u201cWhy should the taxpayer finance a transition for people who are among the richest in society?\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MONTREAL \u2014 Privileged Quebec politicians shouldn&#8217;t accept generous cheques from taxpayers when they quit politics or lose elections, says a &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":216238,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-216237","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","mauthors-caroline-plante","mauthors-giuseppe-valiante","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216237","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=216237"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216237\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":216239,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216237\/revisions\/216239"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/216238"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=216237"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=216237"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=216237"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}