{"id":215551,"date":"2019-05-23T02:00:25","date_gmt":"2019-05-23T06:00:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=215551"},"modified":"2019-05-23T02:00:25","modified_gmt":"2019-05-23T06:00:25","slug":"sitting-and-sleeping-on-downtown-sidewalks-could-net-100-fine-in-b-c-city","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/05\/23\/sitting-and-sleeping-on-downtown-sidewalks-could-net-100-fine-in-b-c-city\/","title":{"rendered":"Sitting and sleeping on downtown sidewalks could net $100 fine in B.C. city"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
Coun. Jake Kimberly told a council meeting it’s \u201cunfortunate\u201d the city has to resort to such a plan but loitering \u201cinterferes with the residents who pay for those sidewalks, it interferes with businesses that pay taxes to operate those stores.\u201d (Photo: Ev\/Unsplash)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

PENTICTON, B.C. — Sitting and sleeping on some downtown sidewalks could be banned in Penticton, B.C., this summer as part of the city’s plan to crack down on loitering.<\/p>\n

Councillors have voted 5-2 in favour of amending the Good Neighbourhood Bylaw, giving police and bylaw officers the power to hand out tickets for $100 fines.<\/p>\n

The measure, which still requires final approval, would be enforced between May and Sept. 30 and cover about a dozen blocks on Ellis, Martin and Main streets.<\/p>\n

Coun. Jake Kimberly told a council meeting it’s \u201cunfortunate\u201d the city has to resort to such a plan but loitering \u201cinterferes with the residents who pay for those sidewalks, it interferes with businesses that pay taxes to operate those stores.\u201d<\/p>\n

Coun. Campbell Watt, who voted against the bylaw, expressed concern about how it may affect people watching a parade, for example, and said he’s not comfortable \u201cpushing people out.\u201d<\/p>\n

Coun. Julius Bloomfield agreed, saying the change would only target the \u201csymptom\u201d of a lack of affordable housing and should include public input.<\/p>\n

\u201cI know there’s a lot of support, but I know there’s a lot of concern as well,\u201d Bloomfield said.<\/p>\n

The bylaw already places limits on panhandling and the changes are aimed at those who are sleeping, loitering or deemed to be causing a nuisance in the designated areas, which make up about 17 per cent of the downtown sidewalk length.<\/p>\n

Bylaw services supervisor Tina Siebert told council the approach is meant to be minimally restrictive and her staff tries to \u201cbalance the heart with the hammer\u201d in its dealings with people.<\/p>\n

Development services manager Anthony Haddad said the three streets selected for the loitering ban were chosen because they’ve either been revitalized or are up-and-coming areas.<\/p>\n

Other tentatively approved amendments to the Good Neighbour Bylaw would change the definition of street to include vacant storefronts, ban the connection of recreational vehicles to the city sewer system and prohibit the installation of lights that shine onto adjacent properties.<\/p>\n

The amendment will be back before council for final approval at a meeting on June 4.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

PENTICTON, B.C. — Sitting and sleeping on some downtown sidewalks could be banned in Penticton, B.C., this summer as part …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":215552,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-215551","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news-ca","category-news","mauthors-joe-fries-the-penticton-herald","mauthors-the-canadian-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215551","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=215551"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215551\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":215553,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215551\/revisions\/215553"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/215552"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=215551"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=215551"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=215551"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}