{"id":214843,"date":"2019-05-18T05:10:34","date_gmt":"2019-05-18T09:10:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=214843"},"modified":"2019-05-18T05:10:34","modified_gmt":"2019-05-18T09:10:34","slug":"texas-passing-laws-but-not-leading-abortion-fight-this-time","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/05\/18\/texas-passing-laws-but-not-leading-abortion-fight-this-time\/","title":{"rendered":"Texas passing laws, but not leading abortion fight this time"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_169210\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-169210\" style=\"width: 1000px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/shutterstock_684626233-1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-169210\" src=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/shutterstock_684626233-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1000\" height=\"750\" srcset=\"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/shutterstock_684626233-1.jpg 1000w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/shutterstock_684626233-1-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/shutterstock_684626233-1-768x576.jpg 768w, https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/shutterstock_684626233-1-20x15.jpg 20w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-169210\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">In 2013, Texas passed a sweeping anti-abortion law that shuttered more than half the state&#8217;s abortion clinics before being struck down three years later by the U.S. Supreme Court, which at the time handed down its strongest defence of abortion rights in a generation . (Shutterstock Photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>AUSTIN, Texas \u2014 Sidestepping bigger abortion battles playing out elsewhere in the U.S., Texas Republicans on Friday pushed a bill toward Gov. Greg Abbott&#8217;s desk that would ban the state&#8217;s liberal capital city from leasing a downtown building to Planned Parenthood for just $1.<\/p>\n<p>For Texas, which has passed some of the nation&#8217;s strictest anti-abortion laws over the past decade, the measure that was largely provoked by a single Planned Parenthood office in Austin is one of the few bills aimed at abortion providers that appears likely to pass the GOP-controlled Legislature before lawmakers adjourn this month.<\/p>\n<p>In 2013, Texas passed a sweeping anti-abortion law that shuttered more than half the state&#8217;s abortion clinics before being struck down three years later by the U.S. Supreme Court, which at the time handed down its strongest defence of abortion rights in a generation .<\/p>\n<p>But Texas Republicans this year have conspicuously stayed on the sidelines. They&#8217;ve instead let other conservative states lead efforts squarely aimed at the Supreme Court&#8217;s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion.<\/p>\n<p>That includes Alabama&#8217;s new abortion ban passed this week, along with measures in Kentucky, Mississippi, Georgia and Ohio that prohibit abortion after a fetal heartbeat is detected.<\/p>\n<p>Democrats said the latest bill passed by the Texas House, although smaller in scale, would still have significant ramifications and disrupt women&#8217;s health services. The Austin Planned Parenthood location that leases a city-owned space for $1 a year does not offer abortion.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt would not impact abortion services,\u201d said Republican state Rep. Sarah Davis, who stood with Democrats during the floor debate. She said the bill instead was a \u201cstatement that the Texas Legislature is so anti-abortion we&#8217;re going to prove it by hurting women.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Democrats tried derailing the bill through procedural measures during a debate that dragged on for hours in the waning days of Texas&#8217; 140-day legislative session, which is set to adjourn May 27. The measure prohibits a government entity from entering into a \u201ctaxpayer resource transaction\u201d with an abortion provider or affiliate.<\/p>\n<p>It still must win a final vote in the House before moving to Abbott&#8217;s desk.<\/p>\n<p>An unusually rough election for Texas Republicans in 2018 has led to a relatively milder legislative session. And this year, some anti-abortion groups in Texas signalled they wanted to focus on bills that stood a better a chance in court.<\/p>\n<p>Another that is also close to Abbott&#8217;s desk threatens doctors with jail time if they don&#8217;t try saving the lives of infants born alive after failed abortion attempts. But such cases are extremely rare.<\/p>\n<p>On the \u201cheartbeat\u201d bill, Republican Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick told a conservative talk radio station this month that it wasn&#8217;t a high priority to some groups \u201cbecause it eventually will be decided in the Supreme Court, and they felt some other state cases were moving.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>AUSTIN, Texas \u2014 Sidestepping bigger abortion battles playing out elsewhere in the U.S., Texas Republicans on Friday pushed a bill &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":169210,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-214843","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","mauthors-paul-j-weber","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214843","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214843"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214843\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":214844,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214843\/revisions\/214844"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/169210"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214843"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214843"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214843"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}