{"id":214255,"date":"2019-05-14T02:39:48","date_gmt":"2019-05-14T06:39:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/?p=214255"},"modified":"2019-05-14T02:40:46","modified_gmt":"2019-05-14T06:40:46","slug":"rosenstein-russia-probe-justified-closing-it-wasnt-option","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/2019\/05\/14\/rosenstein-russia-probe-justified-closing-it-wasnt-option\/","title":{"rendered":"Rosenstein: Russia probe justified, closing it wasn’t option"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
\u201cI was responsible for overseeing that investigation,\u201d Rosenstein said, according to his prepared remarks. (File Photo By Matthew T. Nichols\/US Department of Justice, Public Domain<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

WASHINGTON \u2014 Fresh out of his job as deputy attorney general, Rod Rosenstein said Monday that the Justice Department’s investigation into Russian election interference was \u201cjustified,\u201d that he would have never allowed anyone to interfere with it and that closing it had not been an option.<\/p>\n

He also took aim at former FBI Director James Comey, characterizing him as a \u201cpartisan pundit\u201d busy selling books and earning speaking fees. The barbs continued an extraordinary public spat between the two law enforcement officials, coming days after Comey said in a television interview that he didn’t view Rosenstein as a person of high character.<\/p>\n

The speech before a Baltimore advocacy group for business and civic leaders marked Rosenstein’s most expansive remarks on the recently concluded probe into Russian election interference and potential co-ordination between the Trump campaign and Russia. In it, Rosenstein repeatedly distanced himself from President Donald Trump \u2014 who has decried the investigation as a hoax and witch hunt \u2014 and sought to burnish a legacy for himself as a protector of the Justice Department’s independence who tried to do what he thought was right regardless of public criticism.<\/p>\n

\u201cI was responsible for overseeing that investigation,\u201d Rosenstein said, according to his prepared remarks. \u201cI knew from preliminary briefings with the agents and prosecutors that it was an important investigation. If it was not done correctly, there would always be lingering doubts about the scope of Russian efforts and the extent of American involvement.<\/p>\n

\u201cI would never have allowed anyone to interfere with the investigation,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n

Rosenstein’s resignation took effect last week, but the speech Monday night made clear he is likely to remain a public figure in the months ahead and underscored a desire to explain and even justify a decision-making process that has come under heavy scrutiny by Democrats and Republicans alike.<\/p>\n

He used his speech, his second of the\u00a0day, to defend some of the most contentious actions of his tenure, including his role in Comey’s firing \u2014 he wrote a memo the White House held up as justification for it \u2014 and his subsequent appointment of special counsel Robert Mueller to lead the Russia investigation.<\/p>\n

He said Mueller’s appointment was necessary to preserve public confidence in the Justice Department and to resolve the investigation in a way that would protect America from foreign adversaries. He said he knew not everyone was happy with the move \u2014 a likely reference to Trump and congressional Republicans \u2014 and it would be unpleasant for him and his family.<\/p>\n

\u201cBut at my confirmation hearing, I promised that I would conduct the investigation properly and see it through to the appropriate conclusion,\u201d Rosenstein said. \u201cIn my business, you keep promises. And in my business, the appropriate conclusion is the one that results when you follow the normal process and complete an independent investigation.\u201d<\/p>\n

Perhaps his most pointed comments were reserved for Comey, whom he had criticized in a May 2017 memo for his handling of the Hillary Clinton email investigation, including his decision to publicly announce that the FBI was not recommending charges.<\/p>\n

He said in his speech that though he did not blame Comey for being upset with him, \u201cnow the former Director is a partisan pundit, selling books and earning speaking fees while speculating about the strength of my character and the fate of my immortal soul.<\/p>\n

\u201cThat is disappointing,\u201d Rosenstein added. \u201cSpeculating about souls is not a job for police and prosecutors. Generally we base our opinions on eyewitness testimony.\u201d<\/p>\n

He also said the memo was \u201ccorrect\u201d and \u201creasonable under the circumstances,\u201d even if Trump’s reasons for firing Comey were different from his own.<\/p>\n

Two days after firing Comey, Trump acknowledged in a television interview that he was thinking of \u201cthis Russia thing\u201d when he made the move. Rosenstein said no one had told him what reasons for firing Comey should be put in the memo \u2014 though Mueller’s report says Rosenstein had been asked to reference Russia, a request it says he rejected \u2014 and said he was never told that dismissing Comey was meant to shut down the investigation. He said he did not believe that firing Comey would affect the investigation.<\/p>\n

In a clear break from Trump, though, he said that if he had been in charge of Comey’s firing, \u201cthe removal would have been handled very differently, with far more respect and far less drama.\u201d<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

WASHINGTON \u2014 Fresh out of his job as deputy attorney general, Rod Rosenstein said Monday that the Justice Department’s investigation …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":214256,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-214255","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","category-news-w","mauthors-michael-balsamo","mauthors-eric-tucker","mauthors-the-associated-press"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214255","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=214255"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214255\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":214257,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/214255\/revisions\/214257"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/214256"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=214255"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=214255"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canadianinquirer.net\/v1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=214255"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}